“With my/their/our V-ing…” as supplement to main clause












0















Here are some news article examples containing 'with my/their etc. being...' as supplement to a main clause:




(1) Since the opposing counsel would be the U.S. Department of Justice, and with my being new to that game, I enlisted as co-counsel an accomplished federal litigator with extensive experience in dealing with the DOJ. (Source)



(2) Since this raised many leftists' ire and with my being the reasonable man I am, I propose a compromise: no immigrants from the Third World or the Old World. In other words, no immigration, period. (Source)



(3) The Jordans were serving at Destiny Life Church in Oakland, and with their being hired by Divine Hope Church, both churches merged while keeping the Divine Hope name. (Source)




Is the use of genitive pronouns (my, their, etc.) well-formed and natural?



Or is it better to have accusative pronouns (me, them, etc.) instead?



EDIT



In a related question "with/without + pronoun (me vs. my) + gerund-participial phrase", I have shown this example from The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (Page 461):




We set off again, the Rover going precariously slowly in very low gear up hills, with me staying on its tail in case it petered out altogether.




CGEL says, and I agree, that my cannot replace me in this sentence.



If the above examples (1)-(3) are well-formed and natural, how do you distinguish (1)-(3) from the CGEL example?










share|improve this question





























    0















    Here are some news article examples containing 'with my/their etc. being...' as supplement to a main clause:




    (1) Since the opposing counsel would be the U.S. Department of Justice, and with my being new to that game, I enlisted as co-counsel an accomplished federal litigator with extensive experience in dealing with the DOJ. (Source)



    (2) Since this raised many leftists' ire and with my being the reasonable man I am, I propose a compromise: no immigrants from the Third World or the Old World. In other words, no immigration, period. (Source)



    (3) The Jordans were serving at Destiny Life Church in Oakland, and with their being hired by Divine Hope Church, both churches merged while keeping the Divine Hope name. (Source)




    Is the use of genitive pronouns (my, their, etc.) well-formed and natural?



    Or is it better to have accusative pronouns (me, them, etc.) instead?



    EDIT



    In a related question "with/without + pronoun (me vs. my) + gerund-participial phrase", I have shown this example from The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (Page 461):




    We set off again, the Rover going precariously slowly in very low gear up hills, with me staying on its tail in case it petered out altogether.




    CGEL says, and I agree, that my cannot replace me in this sentence.



    If the above examples (1)-(3) are well-formed and natural, how do you distinguish (1)-(3) from the CGEL example?










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0


      1






      Here are some news article examples containing 'with my/their etc. being...' as supplement to a main clause:




      (1) Since the opposing counsel would be the U.S. Department of Justice, and with my being new to that game, I enlisted as co-counsel an accomplished federal litigator with extensive experience in dealing with the DOJ. (Source)



      (2) Since this raised many leftists' ire and with my being the reasonable man I am, I propose a compromise: no immigrants from the Third World or the Old World. In other words, no immigration, period. (Source)



      (3) The Jordans were serving at Destiny Life Church in Oakland, and with their being hired by Divine Hope Church, both churches merged while keeping the Divine Hope name. (Source)




      Is the use of genitive pronouns (my, their, etc.) well-formed and natural?



      Or is it better to have accusative pronouns (me, them, etc.) instead?



      EDIT



      In a related question "with/without + pronoun (me vs. my) + gerund-participial phrase", I have shown this example from The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (Page 461):




      We set off again, the Rover going precariously slowly in very low gear up hills, with me staying on its tail in case it petered out altogether.




      CGEL says, and I agree, that my cannot replace me in this sentence.



      If the above examples (1)-(3) are well-formed and natural, how do you distinguish (1)-(3) from the CGEL example?










      share|improve this question
















      Here are some news article examples containing 'with my/their etc. being...' as supplement to a main clause:




      (1) Since the opposing counsel would be the U.S. Department of Justice, and with my being new to that game, I enlisted as co-counsel an accomplished federal litigator with extensive experience in dealing with the DOJ. (Source)



      (2) Since this raised many leftists' ire and with my being the reasonable man I am, I propose a compromise: no immigrants from the Third World or the Old World. In other words, no immigration, period. (Source)



      (3) The Jordans were serving at Destiny Life Church in Oakland, and with their being hired by Divine Hope Church, both churches merged while keeping the Divine Hope name. (Source)




      Is the use of genitive pronouns (my, their, etc.) well-formed and natural?



      Or is it better to have accusative pronouns (me, them, etc.) instead?



      EDIT



      In a related question "with/without + pronoun (me vs. my) + gerund-participial phrase", I have shown this example from The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (Page 461):




      We set off again, the Rover going precariously slowly in very low gear up hills, with me staying on its tail in case it petered out altogether.




      CGEL says, and I agree, that my cannot replace me in this sentence.



      If the above examples (1)-(3) are well-formed and natural, how do you distinguish (1)-(3) from the CGEL example?







      gerunds grammatical-case gerund-phrases possessive-vs-oblique






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 min ago







      JK2

















      asked yesterday









      JK2JK2

      39411752




      39411752






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491529%2fwith-my-their-our-v-ing-as-supplement-to-main-clause%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491529%2fwith-my-their-our-v-ing-as-supplement-to-main-clause%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Усть-Каменогорск

          Халкинская богословская школа

          Where does the word Sparryheid come from and mean?