Why is a predicate of 0-arity considered as a sentence letter?












5















I often find that nullary functions are considered constants and 0-arity predicates are considered sentence letters. What is the intuition behind that notation?










share|improve this question





























    5















    I often find that nullary functions are considered constants and 0-arity predicates are considered sentence letters. What is the intuition behind that notation?










    share|improve this question



























      5












      5








      5


      2






      I often find that nullary functions are considered constants and 0-arity predicates are considered sentence letters. What is the intuition behind that notation?










      share|improve this question
















      I often find that nullary functions are considered constants and 0-arity predicates are considered sentence letters. What is the intuition behind that notation?







      logic






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 11 hours ago







      Gabriele Scarlatti

















      asked 12 hours ago









      Gabriele ScarlattiGabriele Scarlatti

      26216




      26216






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          A unary predicate symbol P(x) expresses a "property".



          When we "instantiate" the variable (which is a place-holder) with a "name" a (a term of the language) denoting an onject in the domain of interpretation, what we gate is a sentence P(a) that express a fact.



          It may be True or False, according to the fact that the property expressed by the predicate P holds or not of the object denoted by a .



          Trivial example : let the domain of the interpretation the set N of natural numbers; let P(x) interpreted with "x is Even" and let the individual constant a interpreted with the number 2.



          From an abstract point of view, an interpretation is a mapping from the set of sentences of the language into { T, F }.



          If so, a 0-predicate symbol is a "degenerate" predicate symbol with no place-holders to be filled with "names".



          Thus, in an interpretation it can have only one truth value, because there is no "parameter" on which the truth value of the formula can depend.



          If so, having a specified truth value in an interpretation, it must be a sentence.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "265"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60148%2fwhy-is-a-predicate-of-0-arity-considered-as-a-sentence-letter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6














            A unary predicate symbol P(x) expresses a "property".



            When we "instantiate" the variable (which is a place-holder) with a "name" a (a term of the language) denoting an onject in the domain of interpretation, what we gate is a sentence P(a) that express a fact.



            It may be True or False, according to the fact that the property expressed by the predicate P holds or not of the object denoted by a .



            Trivial example : let the domain of the interpretation the set N of natural numbers; let P(x) interpreted with "x is Even" and let the individual constant a interpreted with the number 2.



            From an abstract point of view, an interpretation is a mapping from the set of sentences of the language into { T, F }.



            If so, a 0-predicate symbol is a "degenerate" predicate symbol with no place-holders to be filled with "names".



            Thus, in an interpretation it can have only one truth value, because there is no "parameter" on which the truth value of the formula can depend.



            If so, having a specified truth value in an interpretation, it must be a sentence.






            share|improve this answer




























              6














              A unary predicate symbol P(x) expresses a "property".



              When we "instantiate" the variable (which is a place-holder) with a "name" a (a term of the language) denoting an onject in the domain of interpretation, what we gate is a sentence P(a) that express a fact.



              It may be True or False, according to the fact that the property expressed by the predicate P holds or not of the object denoted by a .



              Trivial example : let the domain of the interpretation the set N of natural numbers; let P(x) interpreted with "x is Even" and let the individual constant a interpreted with the number 2.



              From an abstract point of view, an interpretation is a mapping from the set of sentences of the language into { T, F }.



              If so, a 0-predicate symbol is a "degenerate" predicate symbol with no place-holders to be filled with "names".



              Thus, in an interpretation it can have only one truth value, because there is no "parameter" on which the truth value of the formula can depend.



              If so, having a specified truth value in an interpretation, it must be a sentence.






              share|improve this answer


























                6












                6








                6







                A unary predicate symbol P(x) expresses a "property".



                When we "instantiate" the variable (which is a place-holder) with a "name" a (a term of the language) denoting an onject in the domain of interpretation, what we gate is a sentence P(a) that express a fact.



                It may be True or False, according to the fact that the property expressed by the predicate P holds or not of the object denoted by a .



                Trivial example : let the domain of the interpretation the set N of natural numbers; let P(x) interpreted with "x is Even" and let the individual constant a interpreted with the number 2.



                From an abstract point of view, an interpretation is a mapping from the set of sentences of the language into { T, F }.



                If so, a 0-predicate symbol is a "degenerate" predicate symbol with no place-holders to be filled with "names".



                Thus, in an interpretation it can have only one truth value, because there is no "parameter" on which the truth value of the formula can depend.



                If so, having a specified truth value in an interpretation, it must be a sentence.






                share|improve this answer













                A unary predicate symbol P(x) expresses a "property".



                When we "instantiate" the variable (which is a place-holder) with a "name" a (a term of the language) denoting an onject in the domain of interpretation, what we gate is a sentence P(a) that express a fact.



                It may be True or False, according to the fact that the property expressed by the predicate P holds or not of the object denoted by a .



                Trivial example : let the domain of the interpretation the set N of natural numbers; let P(x) interpreted with "x is Even" and let the individual constant a interpreted with the number 2.



                From an abstract point of view, an interpretation is a mapping from the set of sentences of the language into { T, F }.



                If so, a 0-predicate symbol is a "degenerate" predicate symbol with no place-holders to be filled with "names".



                Thus, in an interpretation it can have only one truth value, because there is no "parameter" on which the truth value of the formula can depend.



                If so, having a specified truth value in an interpretation, it must be a sentence.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 11 hours ago









                Mauro ALLEGRANZAMauro ALLEGRANZA

                28.5k21963




                28.5k21963






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60148%2fwhy-is-a-predicate-of-0-arity-considered-as-a-sentence-letter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Усть-Каменогорск

                    Халкинская богословская школа

                    Where does the word Sparryheid come from and mean?