Transformation: Negative to affirmative












1
















One day the man could not but go to a market.




The sentence is to be transformed into affirmative. But I am just not getting how to transform it using 'must'. If I write- 'The man must go to a market', then it makes a sense of present tense...but it has to be in past form as the negative sentence was in past form. So I thought about this- "One day it was must for the man to go to a market". I'm not finding any other way except it.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 14 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Are you trying to maintain a poetic flavor, or simply state it clearly?

    – Hot Licks
    Jan 15 at 1:56
















1
















One day the man could not but go to a market.




The sentence is to be transformed into affirmative. But I am just not getting how to transform it using 'must'. If I write- 'The man must go to a market', then it makes a sense of present tense...but it has to be in past form as the negative sentence was in past form. So I thought about this- "One day it was must for the man to go to a market". I'm not finding any other way except it.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 14 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Are you trying to maintain a poetic flavor, or simply state it clearly?

    – Hot Licks
    Jan 15 at 1:56














1












1








1









One day the man could not but go to a market.




The sentence is to be transformed into affirmative. But I am just not getting how to transform it using 'must'. If I write- 'The man must go to a market', then it makes a sense of present tense...but it has to be in past form as the negative sentence was in past form. So I thought about this- "One day it was must for the man to go to a market". I'm not finding any other way except it.










share|improve this question

















One day the man could not but go to a market.




The sentence is to be transformed into affirmative. But I am just not getting how to transform it using 'must'. If I write- 'The man must go to a market', then it makes a sense of present tense...but it has to be in past form as the negative sentence was in past form. So I thought about this- "One day it was must for the man to go to a market". I'm not finding any other way except it.







grammar






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 15 at 1:08









Barmar

9,7751429




9,7751429










asked Jan 10 at 13:27









MoontahaMoontaha

61




61





bumped to the homepage by Community 14 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 14 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Are you trying to maintain a poetic flavor, or simply state it clearly?

    – Hot Licks
    Jan 15 at 1:56



















  • Are you trying to maintain a poetic flavor, or simply state it clearly?

    – Hot Licks
    Jan 15 at 1:56

















Are you trying to maintain a poetic flavor, or simply state it clearly?

– Hot Licks
Jan 15 at 1:56





Are you trying to maintain a poetic flavor, or simply state it clearly?

– Hot Licks
Jan 15 at 1:56










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














must doesn't have a regular past tense, so you can't use the word directly in the sentence. The past tense is had to, so the affirmative form of the sentence would be:




One day the man had to go to the market.







share|improve this answer































    0














    Begin by paraphrasing: "The man could not not go to a market." The first "not" negates the sentence "The man could go to a market", where "could" means "was possible", so we have the paraphrase "It is not the case that it was possible for the man not to go to a market." In modal logic, "not possible not" is equivalent to "necessarily", or "must". Thus, we derive the paraphrase, "It was the case that the man must go to a market." If "must" had the past tense "musted", which of course it does not, then we could get to a more natural sounding *"The man musted go to a market," but this is not possible unless the past tense of "must" can be taken as understood, and if so, we get "The man must go to a market."






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480651%2ftransformation-negative-to-affirmative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      must doesn't have a regular past tense, so you can't use the word directly in the sentence. The past tense is had to, so the affirmative form of the sentence would be:




      One day the man had to go to the market.







      share|improve this answer




























        1














        must doesn't have a regular past tense, so you can't use the word directly in the sentence. The past tense is had to, so the affirmative form of the sentence would be:




        One day the man had to go to the market.







        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          must doesn't have a regular past tense, so you can't use the word directly in the sentence. The past tense is had to, so the affirmative form of the sentence would be:




          One day the man had to go to the market.







          share|improve this answer













          must doesn't have a regular past tense, so you can't use the word directly in the sentence. The past tense is had to, so the affirmative form of the sentence would be:




          One day the man had to go to the market.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 15 at 1:11









          BarmarBarmar

          9,7751429




          9,7751429

























              0














              Begin by paraphrasing: "The man could not not go to a market." The first "not" negates the sentence "The man could go to a market", where "could" means "was possible", so we have the paraphrase "It is not the case that it was possible for the man not to go to a market." In modal logic, "not possible not" is equivalent to "necessarily", or "must". Thus, we derive the paraphrase, "It was the case that the man must go to a market." If "must" had the past tense "musted", which of course it does not, then we could get to a more natural sounding *"The man musted go to a market," but this is not possible unless the past tense of "must" can be taken as understood, and if so, we get "The man must go to a market."






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                Begin by paraphrasing: "The man could not not go to a market." The first "not" negates the sentence "The man could go to a market", where "could" means "was possible", so we have the paraphrase "It is not the case that it was possible for the man not to go to a market." In modal logic, "not possible not" is equivalent to "necessarily", or "must". Thus, we derive the paraphrase, "It was the case that the man must go to a market." If "must" had the past tense "musted", which of course it does not, then we could get to a more natural sounding *"The man musted go to a market," but this is not possible unless the past tense of "must" can be taken as understood, and if so, we get "The man must go to a market."






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Begin by paraphrasing: "The man could not not go to a market." The first "not" negates the sentence "The man could go to a market", where "could" means "was possible", so we have the paraphrase "It is not the case that it was possible for the man not to go to a market." In modal logic, "not possible not" is equivalent to "necessarily", or "must". Thus, we derive the paraphrase, "It was the case that the man must go to a market." If "must" had the past tense "musted", which of course it does not, then we could get to a more natural sounding *"The man musted go to a market," but this is not possible unless the past tense of "must" can be taken as understood, and if so, we get "The man must go to a market."






                  share|improve this answer













                  Begin by paraphrasing: "The man could not not go to a market." The first "not" negates the sentence "The man could go to a market", where "could" means "was possible", so we have the paraphrase "It is not the case that it was possible for the man not to go to a market." In modal logic, "not possible not" is equivalent to "necessarily", or "must". Thus, we derive the paraphrase, "It was the case that the man must go to a market." If "must" had the past tense "musted", which of course it does not, then we could get to a more natural sounding *"The man musted go to a market," but this is not possible unless the past tense of "must" can be taken as understood, and if so, we get "The man must go to a market."







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 10 at 14:02









                  Greg LeeGreg Lee

                  14.4k2931




                  14.4k2931






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480651%2ftransformation-negative-to-affirmative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Рижское политехническое училище

                      Красноярск

                      Is there a gender-neutral alternative to workmanlike suitable for use in legal context?