What loss function to use when labels are probabilities?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


What loss function is most appropriate when training a model with target values that are probabilities? For example, I have a 3-output model with x=[some features] and y=[0.2, 0.3, 0.5].



It seems like something like cross-entropy doesn't make sense here since it assumes that a single target is the correct label.



Would something like MSE (after applying softmax) make sense, or is there a better loss function?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



















    1












    $begingroup$


    What loss function is most appropriate when training a model with target values that are probabilities? For example, I have a 3-output model with x=[some features] and y=[0.2, 0.3, 0.5].



    It seems like something like cross-entropy doesn't make sense here since it assumes that a single target is the correct label.



    Would something like MSE (after applying softmax) make sense, or is there a better loss function?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      What loss function is most appropriate when training a model with target values that are probabilities? For example, I have a 3-output model with x=[some features] and y=[0.2, 0.3, 0.5].



      It seems like something like cross-entropy doesn't make sense here since it assumes that a single target is the correct label.



      Would something like MSE (after applying softmax) make sense, or is there a better loss function?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      What loss function is most appropriate when training a model with target values that are probabilities? For example, I have a 3-output model with x=[some features] and y=[0.2, 0.3, 0.5].



      It seems like something like cross-entropy doesn't make sense here since it assumes that a single target is the correct label.



      Would something like MSE (after applying softmax) make sense, or is there a better loss function?







      neural-networks loss-functions probability-distribution






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      Thomas JohnsonThomas Johnson

      1083




      1083




      New contributor




      Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Thomas Johnson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Actually, the cross-entropy loss function would be appropriate here, since it measures the "distance" between a distribution $q$ and the "true" distribution $p$.



          You are right, though, that using a loss function called "cross_entropy" in many APIs would be a mistake. This is because these functions, as you said, assume a one-hot label. You would need to use the general cross-entropy function,



          $$H(p,q)=-sum_{xin X} p(x) log q(x).$$
          $ $



          Note that one-hot labels would mean that
          $$
          p(x) =
          begin{cases}
          1 & text{if }x text{ is the true label}\
          0 & text{otherwise}
          end{cases}$$



          which causes the cross-entropy $H(p,q)$ to reduce to the form you're familiar with:



          $$H(p,q) = -log q(x_{label})$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "658"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Thomas Johnson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fai.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11816%2fwhat-loss-function-to-use-when-labels-are-probabilities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Actually, the cross-entropy loss function would be appropriate here, since it measures the "distance" between a distribution $q$ and the "true" distribution $p$.



            You are right, though, that using a loss function called "cross_entropy" in many APIs would be a mistake. This is because these functions, as you said, assume a one-hot label. You would need to use the general cross-entropy function,



            $$H(p,q)=-sum_{xin X} p(x) log q(x).$$
            $ $



            Note that one-hot labels would mean that
            $$
            p(x) =
            begin{cases}
            1 & text{if }x text{ is the true label}\
            0 & text{otherwise}
            end{cases}$$



            which causes the cross-entropy $H(p,q)$ to reduce to the form you're familiar with:



            $$H(p,q) = -log q(x_{label})$$






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Actually, the cross-entropy loss function would be appropriate here, since it measures the "distance" between a distribution $q$ and the "true" distribution $p$.



              You are right, though, that using a loss function called "cross_entropy" in many APIs would be a mistake. This is because these functions, as you said, assume a one-hot label. You would need to use the general cross-entropy function,



              $$H(p,q)=-sum_{xin X} p(x) log q(x).$$
              $ $



              Note that one-hot labels would mean that
              $$
              p(x) =
              begin{cases}
              1 & text{if }x text{ is the true label}\
              0 & text{otherwise}
              end{cases}$$



              which causes the cross-entropy $H(p,q)$ to reduce to the form you're familiar with:



              $$H(p,q) = -log q(x_{label})$$






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Actually, the cross-entropy loss function would be appropriate here, since it measures the "distance" between a distribution $q$ and the "true" distribution $p$.



                You are right, though, that using a loss function called "cross_entropy" in many APIs would be a mistake. This is because these functions, as you said, assume a one-hot label. You would need to use the general cross-entropy function,



                $$H(p,q)=-sum_{xin X} p(x) log q(x).$$
                $ $



                Note that one-hot labels would mean that
                $$
                p(x) =
                begin{cases}
                1 & text{if }x text{ is the true label}\
                0 & text{otherwise}
                end{cases}$$



                which causes the cross-entropy $H(p,q)$ to reduce to the form you're familiar with:



                $$H(p,q) = -log q(x_{label})$$






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Actually, the cross-entropy loss function would be appropriate here, since it measures the "distance" between a distribution $q$ and the "true" distribution $p$.



                You are right, though, that using a loss function called "cross_entropy" in many APIs would be a mistake. This is because these functions, as you said, assume a one-hot label. You would need to use the general cross-entropy function,



                $$H(p,q)=-sum_{xin X} p(x) log q(x).$$
                $ $



                Note that one-hot labels would mean that
                $$
                p(x) =
                begin{cases}
                1 & text{if }x text{ is the true label}\
                0 & text{otherwise}
                end{cases}$$



                which causes the cross-entropy $H(p,q)$ to reduce to the form you're familiar with:



                $$H(p,q) = -log q(x_{label})$$







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                Philip RaeisghasemPhilip Raeisghasem

                963119




                963119






















                    Thomas Johnson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Thomas Johnson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Thomas Johnson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Thomas Johnson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Artificial Intelligence Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fai.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11816%2fwhat-loss-function-to-use-when-labels-are-probabilities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Усть-Каменогорск

                    Халкинская богословская школа

                    Where does the word Sparryheid come from and mean?