“I am going to bed” vs. “I will be going to bed”





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







4















What is the difference between saying the following?




I am going to bed in a few minutes.



I will be going to bed in a few minutes.




Or




I will be getting off here. Or, I guess, I will be getting off here. See you.



I am getting off here. Or, I guess, I am getting off here. See you.




Which one seems more fluent and natural?










share|improve this question

























  • See Differences between ways to express future actions

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:40











  • See About the use of future tense,

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:47











  • possible duplicate of How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:57











  • @jwpat7- None of the mentioned links answer my question. I have already had a look at the last link. If you look at the graph that they use for representation, will be going to and am going to have the same graph bar, which make it confusing.

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 16:18













  • usually you're lying. "I'm going to bed now" when you're still online. Current tense is the lie...

    – user58036
    Nov 23 '13 at 2:11


















4















What is the difference between saying the following?




I am going to bed in a few minutes.



I will be going to bed in a few minutes.




Or




I will be getting off here. Or, I guess, I will be getting off here. See you.



I am getting off here. Or, I guess, I am getting off here. See you.




Which one seems more fluent and natural?










share|improve this question

























  • See Differences between ways to express future actions

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:40











  • See About the use of future tense,

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:47











  • possible duplicate of How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:57











  • @jwpat7- None of the mentioned links answer my question. I have already had a look at the last link. If you look at the graph that they use for representation, will be going to and am going to have the same graph bar, which make it confusing.

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 16:18













  • usually you're lying. "I'm going to bed now" when you're still online. Current tense is the lie...

    – user58036
    Nov 23 '13 at 2:11














4












4








4


2






What is the difference between saying the following?




I am going to bed in a few minutes.



I will be going to bed in a few minutes.




Or




I will be getting off here. Or, I guess, I will be getting off here. See you.



I am getting off here. Or, I guess, I am getting off here. See you.




Which one seems more fluent and natural?










share|improve this question
















What is the difference between saying the following?




I am going to bed in a few minutes.



I will be going to bed in a few minutes.




Or




I will be getting off here. Or, I guess, I will be getting off here. See you.



I am getting off here. Or, I guess, I am getting off here. See you.




Which one seems more fluent and natural?







word-choice verbs present-tense progressive-aspect will-be-going






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '12 at 3:14









tchrist

110k30296477




110k30296477










asked Apr 14 '12 at 10:05









NoahNoah

9,81646102152




9,81646102152













  • See Differences between ways to express future actions

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:40











  • See About the use of future tense,

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:47











  • possible duplicate of How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:57











  • @jwpat7- None of the mentioned links answer my question. I have already had a look at the last link. If you look at the graph that they use for representation, will be going to and am going to have the same graph bar, which make it confusing.

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 16:18













  • usually you're lying. "I'm going to bed now" when you're still online. Current tense is the lie...

    – user58036
    Nov 23 '13 at 2:11



















  • See Differences between ways to express future actions

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:40











  • See About the use of future tense,

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:47











  • possible duplicate of How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Apr 14 '12 at 15:57











  • @jwpat7- None of the mentioned links answer my question. I have already had a look at the last link. If you look at the graph that they use for representation, will be going to and am going to have the same graph bar, which make it confusing.

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 16:18













  • usually you're lying. "I'm going to bed now" when you're still online. Current tense is the lie...

    – user58036
    Nov 23 '13 at 2:11

















See Differences between ways to express future actions

– James Waldby - jwpat7
Apr 14 '12 at 15:40





See Differences between ways to express future actions

– James Waldby - jwpat7
Apr 14 '12 at 15:40













See About the use of future tense,

– James Waldby - jwpat7
Apr 14 '12 at 15:47





See About the use of future tense,

– James Waldby - jwpat7
Apr 14 '12 at 15:47













possible duplicate of How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

– James Waldby - jwpat7
Apr 14 '12 at 15:57





possible duplicate of How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

– James Waldby - jwpat7
Apr 14 '12 at 15:57













@jwpat7- None of the mentioned links answer my question. I have already had a look at the last link. If you look at the graph that they use for representation, will be going to and am going to have the same graph bar, which make it confusing.

– Noah
Apr 14 '12 at 16:18







@jwpat7- None of the mentioned links answer my question. I have already had a look at the last link. If you look at the graph that they use for representation, will be going to and am going to have the same graph bar, which make it confusing.

– Noah
Apr 14 '12 at 16:18















usually you're lying. "I'm going to bed now" when you're still online. Current tense is the lie...

– user58036
Nov 23 '13 at 2:11





usually you're lying. "I'm going to bed now" when you're still online. Current tense is the lie...

– user58036
Nov 23 '13 at 2:11










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














Both are fluent and natural, but they have different meanings.



I am... means that not only have you made the decision to go to bed imminently or get off the bus, but you are actively doing that — finishing off a drink or TV programme, or moving towards the bus doors.



I will be... means that you have made the decision to go to bed or get off the bus soon but you haven't actually done anything about it yet.



The import of each sentence is implicit in the tense used. I am is present tense and you are actually in the process of doing the action; I will be is future tense and although you know you will be doing something, you haven't started yet.






share|improve this answer
























  • I am setting next to my friend on a bus and I tell my friend: I guess, I will getting off here, so see you next time. I haven't started standing yet, but I am preparing myself to get off as soon as the bus stops. Or I am just wrapping up my talking. So which one do you think makes more sense?

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:18













  • I would use am in that case, but it's a borderline example because you have made the decision to get off imminently (by using here rather than at the next stop) even though you haven't actually stood up yet.

    – Andrew Leach
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:22











  • But I had this specific bus stop in mind before I got on the bus.I knew that I would be getting off at this particular stop.

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:26











  • So? It's a question of imminence. Here indicates that you are very close to the stop, so am is appropriate because if you don't do something now you will miss your stop. If you are far enough away to say "at the next stop" then it's not imminent and will be is appropriate.

    – Andrew Leach
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:33






  • 1





    @Paola, you are right that this is a common use of the future continuous. (Another example: At this time tomorrow I'll be sitting in the plane on the way home.) However, this is not the only use of this tense. It is also used to denote a planned future action and, as such is equivalent to the present continuous: I'm seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. = I'll be seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. It is also often used to soften questions. Instead of the direct: Are coming to the meeting?, you can ask more obliquely: Will you be coming to the meeting?

    – Shoe
    Apr 14 '12 at 19:40



















2














Your question asks which is more fluent and natural. As a native speaker (British), I would suggest that will sounds rather pedantic despite being technically correct. In most states of imminence I would normally expect am to be used.






share|improve this answer
























  • Yes, and in normal conversation I'd expect that to be the contracted form: I'm. I'm getting off here- See ya later.

    – Jim
    Apr 14 '12 at 19:33



















0














On a similar note, my colleague and I had an argument about a sentence "I am not here" vs "I will not be here" on a future time ( Ex : three or four days later than today). She argues that I am not here on a specific future time is correct while I say that is gramatically incorrect, instead you should be using "I will not be here "on a specific future time. Expert opinion : Which sentence do you think is correct? And why do many people still use "I am not here"






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64222%2fi-am-going-to-bed-vs-i-will-be-going-to-bed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    Both are fluent and natural, but they have different meanings.



    I am... means that not only have you made the decision to go to bed imminently or get off the bus, but you are actively doing that — finishing off a drink or TV programme, or moving towards the bus doors.



    I will be... means that you have made the decision to go to bed or get off the bus soon but you haven't actually done anything about it yet.



    The import of each sentence is implicit in the tense used. I am is present tense and you are actually in the process of doing the action; I will be is future tense and although you know you will be doing something, you haven't started yet.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I am setting next to my friend on a bus and I tell my friend: I guess, I will getting off here, so see you next time. I haven't started standing yet, but I am preparing myself to get off as soon as the bus stops. Or I am just wrapping up my talking. So which one do you think makes more sense?

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:18













    • I would use am in that case, but it's a borderline example because you have made the decision to get off imminently (by using here rather than at the next stop) even though you haven't actually stood up yet.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:22











    • But I had this specific bus stop in mind before I got on the bus.I knew that I would be getting off at this particular stop.

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:26











    • So? It's a question of imminence. Here indicates that you are very close to the stop, so am is appropriate because if you don't do something now you will miss your stop. If you are far enough away to say "at the next stop" then it's not imminent and will be is appropriate.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:33






    • 1





      @Paola, you are right that this is a common use of the future continuous. (Another example: At this time tomorrow I'll be sitting in the plane on the way home.) However, this is not the only use of this tense. It is also used to denote a planned future action and, as such is equivalent to the present continuous: I'm seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. = I'll be seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. It is also often used to soften questions. Instead of the direct: Are coming to the meeting?, you can ask more obliquely: Will you be coming to the meeting?

      – Shoe
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:40
















    4














    Both are fluent and natural, but they have different meanings.



    I am... means that not only have you made the decision to go to bed imminently or get off the bus, but you are actively doing that — finishing off a drink or TV programme, or moving towards the bus doors.



    I will be... means that you have made the decision to go to bed or get off the bus soon but you haven't actually done anything about it yet.



    The import of each sentence is implicit in the tense used. I am is present tense and you are actually in the process of doing the action; I will be is future tense and although you know you will be doing something, you haven't started yet.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I am setting next to my friend on a bus and I tell my friend: I guess, I will getting off here, so see you next time. I haven't started standing yet, but I am preparing myself to get off as soon as the bus stops. Or I am just wrapping up my talking. So which one do you think makes more sense?

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:18













    • I would use am in that case, but it's a borderline example because you have made the decision to get off imminently (by using here rather than at the next stop) even though you haven't actually stood up yet.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:22











    • But I had this specific bus stop in mind before I got on the bus.I knew that I would be getting off at this particular stop.

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:26











    • So? It's a question of imminence. Here indicates that you are very close to the stop, so am is appropriate because if you don't do something now you will miss your stop. If you are far enough away to say "at the next stop" then it's not imminent and will be is appropriate.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:33






    • 1





      @Paola, you are right that this is a common use of the future continuous. (Another example: At this time tomorrow I'll be sitting in the plane on the way home.) However, this is not the only use of this tense. It is also used to denote a planned future action and, as such is equivalent to the present continuous: I'm seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. = I'll be seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. It is also often used to soften questions. Instead of the direct: Are coming to the meeting?, you can ask more obliquely: Will you be coming to the meeting?

      – Shoe
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:40














    4












    4








    4







    Both are fluent and natural, but they have different meanings.



    I am... means that not only have you made the decision to go to bed imminently or get off the bus, but you are actively doing that — finishing off a drink or TV programme, or moving towards the bus doors.



    I will be... means that you have made the decision to go to bed or get off the bus soon but you haven't actually done anything about it yet.



    The import of each sentence is implicit in the tense used. I am is present tense and you are actually in the process of doing the action; I will be is future tense and although you know you will be doing something, you haven't started yet.






    share|improve this answer













    Both are fluent and natural, but they have different meanings.



    I am... means that not only have you made the decision to go to bed imminently or get off the bus, but you are actively doing that — finishing off a drink or TV programme, or moving towards the bus doors.



    I will be... means that you have made the decision to go to bed or get off the bus soon but you haven't actually done anything about it yet.



    The import of each sentence is implicit in the tense used. I am is present tense and you are actually in the process of doing the action; I will be is future tense and although you know you will be doing something, you haven't started yet.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 14 '12 at 10:13









    Andrew LeachAndrew Leach

    80.1k8154258




    80.1k8154258













    • I am setting next to my friend on a bus and I tell my friend: I guess, I will getting off here, so see you next time. I haven't started standing yet, but I am preparing myself to get off as soon as the bus stops. Or I am just wrapping up my talking. So which one do you think makes more sense?

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:18













    • I would use am in that case, but it's a borderline example because you have made the decision to get off imminently (by using here rather than at the next stop) even though you haven't actually stood up yet.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:22











    • But I had this specific bus stop in mind before I got on the bus.I knew that I would be getting off at this particular stop.

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:26











    • So? It's a question of imminence. Here indicates that you are very close to the stop, so am is appropriate because if you don't do something now you will miss your stop. If you are far enough away to say "at the next stop" then it's not imminent and will be is appropriate.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:33






    • 1





      @Paola, you are right that this is a common use of the future continuous. (Another example: At this time tomorrow I'll be sitting in the plane on the way home.) However, this is not the only use of this tense. It is also used to denote a planned future action and, as such is equivalent to the present continuous: I'm seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. = I'll be seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. It is also often used to soften questions. Instead of the direct: Are coming to the meeting?, you can ask more obliquely: Will you be coming to the meeting?

      – Shoe
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:40



















    • I am setting next to my friend on a bus and I tell my friend: I guess, I will getting off here, so see you next time. I haven't started standing yet, but I am preparing myself to get off as soon as the bus stops. Or I am just wrapping up my talking. So which one do you think makes more sense?

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:18













    • I would use am in that case, but it's a borderline example because you have made the decision to get off imminently (by using here rather than at the next stop) even though you haven't actually stood up yet.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:22











    • But I had this specific bus stop in mind before I got on the bus.I knew that I would be getting off at this particular stop.

      – Noah
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:26











    • So? It's a question of imminence. Here indicates that you are very close to the stop, so am is appropriate because if you don't do something now you will miss your stop. If you are far enough away to say "at the next stop" then it's not imminent and will be is appropriate.

      – Andrew Leach
      Apr 14 '12 at 10:33






    • 1





      @Paola, you are right that this is a common use of the future continuous. (Another example: At this time tomorrow I'll be sitting in the plane on the way home.) However, this is not the only use of this tense. It is also used to denote a planned future action and, as such is equivalent to the present continuous: I'm seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. = I'll be seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. It is also often used to soften questions. Instead of the direct: Are coming to the meeting?, you can ask more obliquely: Will you be coming to the meeting?

      – Shoe
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:40

















    I am setting next to my friend on a bus and I tell my friend: I guess, I will getting off here, so see you next time. I haven't started standing yet, but I am preparing myself to get off as soon as the bus stops. Or I am just wrapping up my talking. So which one do you think makes more sense?

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:18







    I am setting next to my friend on a bus and I tell my friend: I guess, I will getting off here, so see you next time. I haven't started standing yet, but I am preparing myself to get off as soon as the bus stops. Or I am just wrapping up my talking. So which one do you think makes more sense?

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:18















    I would use am in that case, but it's a borderline example because you have made the decision to get off imminently (by using here rather than at the next stop) even though you haven't actually stood up yet.

    – Andrew Leach
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:22





    I would use am in that case, but it's a borderline example because you have made the decision to get off imminently (by using here rather than at the next stop) even though you haven't actually stood up yet.

    – Andrew Leach
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:22













    But I had this specific bus stop in mind before I got on the bus.I knew that I would be getting off at this particular stop.

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:26





    But I had this specific bus stop in mind before I got on the bus.I knew that I would be getting off at this particular stop.

    – Noah
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:26













    So? It's a question of imminence. Here indicates that you are very close to the stop, so am is appropriate because if you don't do something now you will miss your stop. If you are far enough away to say "at the next stop" then it's not imminent and will be is appropriate.

    – Andrew Leach
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:33





    So? It's a question of imminence. Here indicates that you are very close to the stop, so am is appropriate because if you don't do something now you will miss your stop. If you are far enough away to say "at the next stop" then it's not imminent and will be is appropriate.

    – Andrew Leach
    Apr 14 '12 at 10:33




    1




    1





    @Paola, you are right that this is a common use of the future continuous. (Another example: At this time tomorrow I'll be sitting in the plane on the way home.) However, this is not the only use of this tense. It is also used to denote a planned future action and, as such is equivalent to the present continuous: I'm seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. = I'll be seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. It is also often used to soften questions. Instead of the direct: Are coming to the meeting?, you can ask more obliquely: Will you be coming to the meeting?

    – Shoe
    Apr 14 '12 at 19:40





    @Paola, you are right that this is a common use of the future continuous. (Another example: At this time tomorrow I'll be sitting in the plane on the way home.) However, this is not the only use of this tense. It is also used to denote a planned future action and, as such is equivalent to the present continuous: I'm seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. = I'll be seeing the boss at 10.30 tomorrow. It is also often used to soften questions. Instead of the direct: Are coming to the meeting?, you can ask more obliquely: Will you be coming to the meeting?

    – Shoe
    Apr 14 '12 at 19:40













    2














    Your question asks which is more fluent and natural. As a native speaker (British), I would suggest that will sounds rather pedantic despite being technically correct. In most states of imminence I would normally expect am to be used.






    share|improve this answer
























    • Yes, and in normal conversation I'd expect that to be the contracted form: I'm. I'm getting off here- See ya later.

      – Jim
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:33
















    2














    Your question asks which is more fluent and natural. As a native speaker (British), I would suggest that will sounds rather pedantic despite being technically correct. In most states of imminence I would normally expect am to be used.






    share|improve this answer
























    • Yes, and in normal conversation I'd expect that to be the contracted form: I'm. I'm getting off here- See ya later.

      – Jim
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:33














    2












    2








    2







    Your question asks which is more fluent and natural. As a native speaker (British), I would suggest that will sounds rather pedantic despite being technically correct. In most states of imminence I would normally expect am to be used.






    share|improve this answer













    Your question asks which is more fluent and natural. As a native speaker (British), I would suggest that will sounds rather pedantic despite being technically correct. In most states of imminence I would normally expect am to be used.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 14 '12 at 11:56









    Tony BalmforthTony Balmforth

    3,337919




    3,337919













    • Yes, and in normal conversation I'd expect that to be the contracted form: I'm. I'm getting off here- See ya later.

      – Jim
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:33



















    • Yes, and in normal conversation I'd expect that to be the contracted form: I'm. I'm getting off here- See ya later.

      – Jim
      Apr 14 '12 at 19:33

















    Yes, and in normal conversation I'd expect that to be the contracted form: I'm. I'm getting off here- See ya later.

    – Jim
    Apr 14 '12 at 19:33





    Yes, and in normal conversation I'd expect that to be the contracted form: I'm. I'm getting off here- See ya later.

    – Jim
    Apr 14 '12 at 19:33











    0














    On a similar note, my colleague and I had an argument about a sentence "I am not here" vs "I will not be here" on a future time ( Ex : three or four days later than today). She argues that I am not here on a specific future time is correct while I say that is gramatically incorrect, instead you should be using "I will not be here "on a specific future time. Expert opinion : Which sentence do you think is correct? And why do many people still use "I am not here"






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      0














      On a similar note, my colleague and I had an argument about a sentence "I am not here" vs "I will not be here" on a future time ( Ex : three or four days later than today). She argues that I am not here on a specific future time is correct while I say that is gramatically incorrect, instead you should be using "I will not be here "on a specific future time. Expert opinion : Which sentence do you think is correct? And why do many people still use "I am not here"






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        0












        0








        0







        On a similar note, my colleague and I had an argument about a sentence "I am not here" vs "I will not be here" on a future time ( Ex : three or four days later than today). She argues that I am not here on a specific future time is correct while I say that is gramatically incorrect, instead you should be using "I will not be here "on a specific future time. Expert opinion : Which sentence do you think is correct? And why do many people still use "I am not here"






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        On a similar note, my colleague and I had an argument about a sentence "I am not here" vs "I will not be here" on a future time ( Ex : three or four days later than today). She argues that I am not here on a specific future time is correct while I say that is gramatically incorrect, instead you should be using "I will not be here "on a specific future time. Expert opinion : Which sentence do you think is correct? And why do many people still use "I am not here"







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 15 mins ago









        user344115user344115

        1




        1




        New contributor




        user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        user344115 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64222%2fi-am-going-to-bed-vs-i-will-be-going-to-bed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Рижское политехническое училище

            Красноярск

            Is there a gender-neutral alternative to workmanlike suitable for use in legal context?