Question on the usage of “taking into consideration”
I am inquiring the correct usage of "taking/taken into consideration" in the following context:
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taking randomness into consideration.
Or
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taken randomness into consideration.
Which one is correct? Thanks for a lot!
grammar grammaticality
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
add a comment |
I am inquiring the correct usage of "taking/taken into consideration" in the following context:
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taking randomness into consideration.
Or
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taken randomness into consideration.
Which one is correct? Thanks for a lot!
grammar grammaticality
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
2
It should be taking randomness into consideration.
– mama
1 hour ago
1
I note "and also" has fifty-percent redundancy. It would be alright to just use one, it may be preferable to not use either. I find it difficult to imagine what XXX could be that would make the rest of the first clause acceptable. The second clauses are, apart from the location of the carriage return, identical. Come to that so are the first, what's the question again?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
54 mins ago
add a comment |
I am inquiring the correct usage of "taking/taken into consideration" in the following context:
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taking randomness into consideration.
Or
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taken randomness into consideration.
Which one is correct? Thanks for a lot!
grammar grammaticality
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
I am inquiring the correct usage of "taking/taken into consideration" in the following context:
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taking randomness into consideration.
Or
We leave it as one future work to XXX, given the identified issues and also taken randomness into consideration.
Which one is correct? Thanks for a lot!
grammar grammaticality
grammar grammaticality
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
asked 1 hour ago
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
1471210
1471210
2
It should be taking randomness into consideration.
– mama
1 hour ago
1
I note "and also" has fifty-percent redundancy. It would be alright to just use one, it may be preferable to not use either. I find it difficult to imagine what XXX could be that would make the rest of the first clause acceptable. The second clauses are, apart from the location of the carriage return, identical. Come to that so are the first, what's the question again?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
54 mins ago
add a comment |
2
It should be taking randomness into consideration.
– mama
1 hour ago
1
I note "and also" has fifty-percent redundancy. It would be alright to just use one, it may be preferable to not use either. I find it difficult to imagine what XXX could be that would make the rest of the first clause acceptable. The second clauses are, apart from the location of the carriage return, identical. Come to that so are the first, what's the question again?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
54 mins ago
2
2
It should be taking randomness into consideration.
– mama
1 hour ago
It should be taking randomness into consideration.
– mama
1 hour ago
1
1
I note "and also" has fifty-percent redundancy. It would be alright to just use one, it may be preferable to not use either. I find it difficult to imagine what XXX could be that would make the rest of the first clause acceptable. The second clauses are, apart from the location of the carriage return, identical. Come to that so are the first, what's the question again?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
54 mins ago
I note "and also" has fifty-percent redundancy. It would be alright to just use one, it may be preferable to not use either. I find it difficult to imagine what XXX could be that would make the rest of the first clause acceptable. The second clauses are, apart from the location of the carriage return, identical. Come to that so are the first, what's the question again?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
54 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Phr. to take into consideration, under consideration. OED
As in your example (commenting on the tense, not the entire grammatically of the sentence):
... and also taking randomness into consideration.
and
It may be fairly cheap to buy, but have you taken into consideration the money you'll spend on repairs?
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484868%2fquestion-on-the-usage-of-taking-into-consideration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Phr. to take into consideration, under consideration. OED
As in your example (commenting on the tense, not the entire grammatically of the sentence):
... and also taking randomness into consideration.
and
It may be fairly cheap to buy, but have you taken into consideration the money you'll spend on repairs?
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
add a comment |
Phr. to take into consideration, under consideration. OED
As in your example (commenting on the tense, not the entire grammatically of the sentence):
... and also taking randomness into consideration.
and
It may be fairly cheap to buy, but have you taken into consideration the money you'll spend on repairs?
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
add a comment |
Phr. to take into consideration, under consideration. OED
As in your example (commenting on the tense, not the entire grammatically of the sentence):
... and also taking randomness into consideration.
and
It may be fairly cheap to buy, but have you taken into consideration the money you'll spend on repairs?
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
Phr. to take into consideration, under consideration. OED
As in your example (commenting on the tense, not the entire grammatically of the sentence):
... and also taking randomness into consideration.
and
It may be fairly cheap to buy, but have you taken into consideration the money you'll spend on repairs?
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
answered 46 mins ago
lbflbf
20.6k22573
20.6k22573
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484868%2fquestion-on-the-usage-of-taking-into-consideration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It should be taking randomness into consideration.
– mama
1 hour ago
1
I note "and also" has fifty-percent redundancy. It would be alright to just use one, it may be preferable to not use either. I find it difficult to imagine what XXX could be that would make the rest of the first clause acceptable. The second clauses are, apart from the location of the carriage return, identical. Come to that so are the first, what's the question again?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
54 mins ago