How much of a difference would shifting from a (24/34/44, 14x28) to a (28/38/48, 11x34) configuration make...
I currently have a Proton MTB with a 24/34/44 crankset and a 14-28 cassette. I have found the configuration to be lacking when going downhill: The front chain ring doesn't feel stiff enough on the highest gear resulting in me pedaling too hard.
How much of a difference would it make if I shift to a 28/38/48 crankset and a 11-34 cassette? This configuration is found on the Giant Roam 3 (2018) which I am considering buying. I've done some math:
On the MTB, running the highest gear, I am at an effective gear ratio of 44/14 = 3.14 while the Roam 3's config would give me 48/11 = 4.36. On paper, this is a 38% increase, but I am not experienced enough to know if this translates to a significant difference when pedaling.
The other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
gears crankset cassette
New contributor
add a comment |
I currently have a Proton MTB with a 24/34/44 crankset and a 14-28 cassette. I have found the configuration to be lacking when going downhill: The front chain ring doesn't feel stiff enough on the highest gear resulting in me pedaling too hard.
How much of a difference would it make if I shift to a 28/38/48 crankset and a 11-34 cassette? This configuration is found on the Giant Roam 3 (2018) which I am considering buying. I've done some math:
On the MTB, running the highest gear, I am at an effective gear ratio of 44/14 = 3.14 while the Roam 3's config would give me 48/11 = 4.36. On paper, this is a 38% increase, but I am not experienced enough to know if this translates to a significant difference when pedaling.
The other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
gears crankset cassette
New contributor
Can you do a test ride? And what kind of downhills? How long? How steep?
– Andrew Henle
10 hours ago
Unfortunately, no. The area where the shop is located is pretty flat so I can't test it out on the slopes I would usually encounter on my daily route.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Not a direct answer but 48/11 on 700c wheels is a good fast downhill gear for a hybrid - that's what mine has. It will reach 50km/h at a comfortable cadence (handy for keeping up with cars to make a turn at the bottom of a hill on my old commute). On another note that's a very narrow range on your MTB cassette.
– Chris H
5 hours ago
14-28 sounds like it might be a freewheel not a cassette - can you confirm which it is? A freewheel might not go smaller than 14T
– Criggie♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
I currently have a Proton MTB with a 24/34/44 crankset and a 14-28 cassette. I have found the configuration to be lacking when going downhill: The front chain ring doesn't feel stiff enough on the highest gear resulting in me pedaling too hard.
How much of a difference would it make if I shift to a 28/38/48 crankset and a 11-34 cassette? This configuration is found on the Giant Roam 3 (2018) which I am considering buying. I've done some math:
On the MTB, running the highest gear, I am at an effective gear ratio of 44/14 = 3.14 while the Roam 3's config would give me 48/11 = 4.36. On paper, this is a 38% increase, but I am not experienced enough to know if this translates to a significant difference when pedaling.
The other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
gears crankset cassette
New contributor
I currently have a Proton MTB with a 24/34/44 crankset and a 14-28 cassette. I have found the configuration to be lacking when going downhill: The front chain ring doesn't feel stiff enough on the highest gear resulting in me pedaling too hard.
How much of a difference would it make if I shift to a 28/38/48 crankset and a 11-34 cassette? This configuration is found on the Giant Roam 3 (2018) which I am considering buying. I've done some math:
On the MTB, running the highest gear, I am at an effective gear ratio of 44/14 = 3.14 while the Roam 3's config would give me 48/11 = 4.36. On paper, this is a 38% increase, but I am not experienced enough to know if this translates to a significant difference when pedaling.
The other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
gears crankset cassette
gears crankset cassette
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
Criggie♦
43.6k573149
43.6k573149
New contributor
asked 10 hours ago
Aamir KhanAamir Khan
1134
1134
New contributor
New contributor
Can you do a test ride? And what kind of downhills? How long? How steep?
– Andrew Henle
10 hours ago
Unfortunately, no. The area where the shop is located is pretty flat so I can't test it out on the slopes I would usually encounter on my daily route.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Not a direct answer but 48/11 on 700c wheels is a good fast downhill gear for a hybrid - that's what mine has. It will reach 50km/h at a comfortable cadence (handy for keeping up with cars to make a turn at the bottom of a hill on my old commute). On another note that's a very narrow range on your MTB cassette.
– Chris H
5 hours ago
14-28 sounds like it might be a freewheel not a cassette - can you confirm which it is? A freewheel might not go smaller than 14T
– Criggie♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Can you do a test ride? And what kind of downhills? How long? How steep?
– Andrew Henle
10 hours ago
Unfortunately, no. The area where the shop is located is pretty flat so I can't test it out on the slopes I would usually encounter on my daily route.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Not a direct answer but 48/11 on 700c wheels is a good fast downhill gear for a hybrid - that's what mine has. It will reach 50km/h at a comfortable cadence (handy for keeping up with cars to make a turn at the bottom of a hill on my old commute). On another note that's a very narrow range on your MTB cassette.
– Chris H
5 hours ago
14-28 sounds like it might be a freewheel not a cassette - can you confirm which it is? A freewheel might not go smaller than 14T
– Criggie♦
3 hours ago
Can you do a test ride? And what kind of downhills? How long? How steep?
– Andrew Henle
10 hours ago
Can you do a test ride? And what kind of downhills? How long? How steep?
– Andrew Henle
10 hours ago
Unfortunately, no. The area where the shop is located is pretty flat so I can't test it out on the slopes I would usually encounter on my daily route.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Unfortunately, no. The area where the shop is located is pretty flat so I can't test it out on the slopes I would usually encounter on my daily route.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Not a direct answer but 48/11 on 700c wheels is a good fast downhill gear for a hybrid - that's what mine has. It will reach 50km/h at a comfortable cadence (handy for keeping up with cars to make a turn at the bottom of a hill on my old commute). On another note that's a very narrow range on your MTB cassette.
– Chris H
5 hours ago
Not a direct answer but 48/11 on 700c wheels is a good fast downhill gear for a hybrid - that's what mine has. It will reach 50km/h at a comfortable cadence (handy for keeping up with cars to make a turn at the bottom of a hill on my old commute). On another note that's a very narrow range on your MTB cassette.
– Chris H
5 hours ago
14-28 sounds like it might be a freewheel not a cassette - can you confirm which it is? A freewheel might not go smaller than 14T
– Criggie♦
3 hours ago
14-28 sounds like it might be a freewheel not a cassette - can you confirm which it is? A freewheel might not go smaller than 14T
– Criggie♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
38% is a huge difference, and very noticeable on road. Since the bike you are considering has 622mm rims, it adds even more to the effective gear ratio.
With 38mm tyres too- how close would this be to 50x11 on a thinner tyre a la road bike, for comparison? Also how about the lower gear combo? OP hasn’t asked but might not have thought/interesting context for a rounded answer :)
– Swifty
9 hours ago
1
sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
– ojs
9 hours ago
2
The difference between 50 and 48 is only 4%, so I wouldn't worry about it. You are getting most of the improvement from the change 14 to 11 at the rear. If you are upgrading the current bike, you could change the cassette first, keep your current chain rings, and see if it suits your needs. That would defer some of the investmentj.
– Ross Millikan
8 hours ago
@DavidRicherby If you carefully read the question, you'll find out that the OP replacing his BSO MTB (very likely 559mm rims) with a hybrid with 622mm rims.
– ojs
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Going from 44/14 = 3.14 48/11 = 4.36 is a big difference. On a given downhill your pedaling speed would 70% of that required with the lower gearing. You would not lose out on low ratios either: 24/28 = 0.86, 28/34 = 0.82.
The trouble is, your rear derailleur probably cannot accommodate a 11-34 cassette. (Derailleurs have total capacity and max sprocket size specifications. Capacity is the difference between chainring sizes plus the difference between sprocket sizes - the wider range cassette requires 7 more teeth of capacity). Your chainstay may not have a may not have the clearance for the larger chainrings either. You don't say how many rear speeds you have but I'm guessing it's 6 or less if you have a 14-28 sprockets, and you probably actually have a freewheel rather than a freehub and cassette which limits your options. You may be able to squeeze a 12-28 freewheel in which would bring your highest ratio up a bit.
Honestly, if you want better gear ratio options, you may just need to buy the better bike with a more modern drivetrain.
Thanks for the answer. Yes, the other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
It will make a significant difference and increase the top end speed for a given cadence noticeably. Gravity is your friend though going downhill, it’s not like the higher gearing of 48x11 will make you way faster downhill, but you would be able to sustain a comfortable cadence on longer, gentle descents before freewheeling
Meanwhile, at the bottom end, you wouldn’t be sacrificing your lowest gear by much and if you’re riding on the road you would have a gear for most hills (28x34 is lower than or comparable to most roadbikes).
The main comparison I would suggest is that 48x11 on 38mm tyres is exactly the same gear ratio as you would have on a road bike with 50x11 top gear and 23mm tyres. You’d just have a slight aerodynamic penalty on the flat bars, which actually benefits in the context of this question when you’re maxing out your cadence on the MTB. Weirdly.
See this table from bikecalc.com when pedalling at 100 rpm in 48x11 you would be travelling at 35 mph which is a good pace on any bike, especially if you can keep it up!
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "126"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Aamir Khan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59279%2fhow-much-of-a-difference-would-shifting-from-a-24-34-44-14x28-to-a-28-38-48%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
38% is a huge difference, and very noticeable on road. Since the bike you are considering has 622mm rims, it adds even more to the effective gear ratio.
With 38mm tyres too- how close would this be to 50x11 on a thinner tyre a la road bike, for comparison? Also how about the lower gear combo? OP hasn’t asked but might not have thought/interesting context for a rounded answer :)
– Swifty
9 hours ago
1
sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
– ojs
9 hours ago
2
The difference between 50 and 48 is only 4%, so I wouldn't worry about it. You are getting most of the improvement from the change 14 to 11 at the rear. If you are upgrading the current bike, you could change the cassette first, keep your current chain rings, and see if it suits your needs. That would defer some of the investmentj.
– Ross Millikan
8 hours ago
@DavidRicherby If you carefully read the question, you'll find out that the OP replacing his BSO MTB (very likely 559mm rims) with a hybrid with 622mm rims.
– ojs
1 hour ago
add a comment |
38% is a huge difference, and very noticeable on road. Since the bike you are considering has 622mm rims, it adds even more to the effective gear ratio.
With 38mm tyres too- how close would this be to 50x11 on a thinner tyre a la road bike, for comparison? Also how about the lower gear combo? OP hasn’t asked but might not have thought/interesting context for a rounded answer :)
– Swifty
9 hours ago
1
sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
– ojs
9 hours ago
2
The difference between 50 and 48 is only 4%, so I wouldn't worry about it. You are getting most of the improvement from the change 14 to 11 at the rear. If you are upgrading the current bike, you could change the cassette first, keep your current chain rings, and see if it suits your needs. That would defer some of the investmentj.
– Ross Millikan
8 hours ago
@DavidRicherby If you carefully read the question, you'll find out that the OP replacing his BSO MTB (very likely 559mm rims) with a hybrid with 622mm rims.
– ojs
1 hour ago
add a comment |
38% is a huge difference, and very noticeable on road. Since the bike you are considering has 622mm rims, it adds even more to the effective gear ratio.
38% is a huge difference, and very noticeable on road. Since the bike you are considering has 622mm rims, it adds even more to the effective gear ratio.
answered 10 hours ago
ojsojs
11.6k22142
11.6k22142
With 38mm tyres too- how close would this be to 50x11 on a thinner tyre a la road bike, for comparison? Also how about the lower gear combo? OP hasn’t asked but might not have thought/interesting context for a rounded answer :)
– Swifty
9 hours ago
1
sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
– ojs
9 hours ago
2
The difference between 50 and 48 is only 4%, so I wouldn't worry about it. You are getting most of the improvement from the change 14 to 11 at the rear. If you are upgrading the current bike, you could change the cassette first, keep your current chain rings, and see if it suits your needs. That would defer some of the investmentj.
– Ross Millikan
8 hours ago
@DavidRicherby If you carefully read the question, you'll find out that the OP replacing his BSO MTB (very likely 559mm rims) with a hybrid with 622mm rims.
– ojs
1 hour ago
add a comment |
With 38mm tyres too- how close would this be to 50x11 on a thinner tyre a la road bike, for comparison? Also how about the lower gear combo? OP hasn’t asked but might not have thought/interesting context for a rounded answer :)
– Swifty
9 hours ago
1
sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
– ojs
9 hours ago
2
The difference between 50 and 48 is only 4%, so I wouldn't worry about it. You are getting most of the improvement from the change 14 to 11 at the rear. If you are upgrading the current bike, you could change the cassette first, keep your current chain rings, and see if it suits your needs. That would defer some of the investmentj.
– Ross Millikan
8 hours ago
@DavidRicherby If you carefully read the question, you'll find out that the OP replacing his BSO MTB (very likely 559mm rims) with a hybrid with 622mm rims.
– ojs
1 hour ago
With 38mm tyres too- how close would this be to 50x11 on a thinner tyre a la road bike, for comparison? Also how about the lower gear combo? OP hasn’t asked but might not have thought/interesting context for a rounded answer :)
– Swifty
9 hours ago
With 38mm tyres too- how close would this be to 50x11 on a thinner tyre a la road bike, for comparison? Also how about the lower gear combo? OP hasn’t asked but might not have thought/interesting context for a rounded answer :)
– Swifty
9 hours ago
1
1
sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
– ojs
9 hours ago
sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
– ojs
9 hours ago
2
2
The difference between 50 and 48 is only 4%, so I wouldn't worry about it. You are getting most of the improvement from the change 14 to 11 at the rear. If you are upgrading the current bike, you could change the cassette first, keep your current chain rings, and see if it suits your needs. That would defer some of the investmentj.
– Ross Millikan
8 hours ago
The difference between 50 and 48 is only 4%, so I wouldn't worry about it. You are getting most of the improvement from the change 14 to 11 at the rear. If you are upgrading the current bike, you could change the cassette first, keep your current chain rings, and see if it suits your needs. That would defer some of the investmentj.
– Ross Millikan
8 hours ago
@DavidRicherby If you carefully read the question, you'll find out that the OP replacing his BSO MTB (very likely 559mm rims) with a hybrid with 622mm rims.
– ojs
1 hour ago
@DavidRicherby If you carefully read the question, you'll find out that the OP replacing his BSO MTB (very likely 559mm rims) with a hybrid with 622mm rims.
– ojs
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Going from 44/14 = 3.14 48/11 = 4.36 is a big difference. On a given downhill your pedaling speed would 70% of that required with the lower gearing. You would not lose out on low ratios either: 24/28 = 0.86, 28/34 = 0.82.
The trouble is, your rear derailleur probably cannot accommodate a 11-34 cassette. (Derailleurs have total capacity and max sprocket size specifications. Capacity is the difference between chainring sizes plus the difference between sprocket sizes - the wider range cassette requires 7 more teeth of capacity). Your chainstay may not have a may not have the clearance for the larger chainrings either. You don't say how many rear speeds you have but I'm guessing it's 6 or less if you have a 14-28 sprockets, and you probably actually have a freewheel rather than a freehub and cassette which limits your options. You may be able to squeeze a 12-28 freewheel in which would bring your highest ratio up a bit.
Honestly, if you want better gear ratio options, you may just need to buy the better bike with a more modern drivetrain.
Thanks for the answer. Yes, the other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Going from 44/14 = 3.14 48/11 = 4.36 is a big difference. On a given downhill your pedaling speed would 70% of that required with the lower gearing. You would not lose out on low ratios either: 24/28 = 0.86, 28/34 = 0.82.
The trouble is, your rear derailleur probably cannot accommodate a 11-34 cassette. (Derailleurs have total capacity and max sprocket size specifications. Capacity is the difference between chainring sizes plus the difference between sprocket sizes - the wider range cassette requires 7 more teeth of capacity). Your chainstay may not have a may not have the clearance for the larger chainrings either. You don't say how many rear speeds you have but I'm guessing it's 6 or less if you have a 14-28 sprockets, and you probably actually have a freewheel rather than a freehub and cassette which limits your options. You may be able to squeeze a 12-28 freewheel in which would bring your highest ratio up a bit.
Honestly, if you want better gear ratio options, you may just need to buy the better bike with a more modern drivetrain.
Thanks for the answer. Yes, the other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Going from 44/14 = 3.14 48/11 = 4.36 is a big difference. On a given downhill your pedaling speed would 70% of that required with the lower gearing. You would not lose out on low ratios either: 24/28 = 0.86, 28/34 = 0.82.
The trouble is, your rear derailleur probably cannot accommodate a 11-34 cassette. (Derailleurs have total capacity and max sprocket size specifications. Capacity is the difference between chainring sizes plus the difference between sprocket sizes - the wider range cassette requires 7 more teeth of capacity). Your chainstay may not have a may not have the clearance for the larger chainrings either. You don't say how many rear speeds you have but I'm guessing it's 6 or less if you have a 14-28 sprockets, and you probably actually have a freewheel rather than a freehub and cassette which limits your options. You may be able to squeeze a 12-28 freewheel in which would bring your highest ratio up a bit.
Honestly, if you want better gear ratio options, you may just need to buy the better bike with a more modern drivetrain.
Going from 44/14 = 3.14 48/11 = 4.36 is a big difference. On a given downhill your pedaling speed would 70% of that required with the lower gearing. You would not lose out on low ratios either: 24/28 = 0.86, 28/34 = 0.82.
The trouble is, your rear derailleur probably cannot accommodate a 11-34 cassette. (Derailleurs have total capacity and max sprocket size specifications. Capacity is the difference between chainring sizes plus the difference between sprocket sizes - the wider range cassette requires 7 more teeth of capacity). Your chainstay may not have a may not have the clearance for the larger chainrings either. You don't say how many rear speeds you have but I'm guessing it's 6 or less if you have a 14-28 sprockets, and you probably actually have a freewheel rather than a freehub and cassette which limits your options. You may be able to squeeze a 12-28 freewheel in which would bring your highest ratio up a bit.
Honestly, if you want better gear ratio options, you may just need to buy the better bike with a more modern drivetrain.
answered 7 hours ago
Argenti ApparatusArgenti Apparatus
34.9k23687
34.9k23687
Thanks for the answer. Yes, the other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for the answer. Yes, the other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Thanks for the answer. Yes, the other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Thanks for the answer. Yes, the other configuration I've mentioned is actually on another bike that I am considering buying (Giant Roam 3 2018). I am not looking to modify the current bike.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
It will make a significant difference and increase the top end speed for a given cadence noticeably. Gravity is your friend though going downhill, it’s not like the higher gearing of 48x11 will make you way faster downhill, but you would be able to sustain a comfortable cadence on longer, gentle descents before freewheeling
Meanwhile, at the bottom end, you wouldn’t be sacrificing your lowest gear by much and if you’re riding on the road you would have a gear for most hills (28x34 is lower than or comparable to most roadbikes).
The main comparison I would suggest is that 48x11 on 38mm tyres is exactly the same gear ratio as you would have on a road bike with 50x11 top gear and 23mm tyres. You’d just have a slight aerodynamic penalty on the flat bars, which actually benefits in the context of this question when you’re maxing out your cadence on the MTB. Weirdly.
See this table from bikecalc.com when pedalling at 100 rpm in 48x11 you would be travelling at 35 mph which is a good pace on any bike, especially if you can keep it up!
add a comment |
It will make a significant difference and increase the top end speed for a given cadence noticeably. Gravity is your friend though going downhill, it’s not like the higher gearing of 48x11 will make you way faster downhill, but you would be able to sustain a comfortable cadence on longer, gentle descents before freewheeling
Meanwhile, at the bottom end, you wouldn’t be sacrificing your lowest gear by much and if you’re riding on the road you would have a gear for most hills (28x34 is lower than or comparable to most roadbikes).
The main comparison I would suggest is that 48x11 on 38mm tyres is exactly the same gear ratio as you would have on a road bike with 50x11 top gear and 23mm tyres. You’d just have a slight aerodynamic penalty on the flat bars, which actually benefits in the context of this question when you’re maxing out your cadence on the MTB. Weirdly.
See this table from bikecalc.com when pedalling at 100 rpm in 48x11 you would be travelling at 35 mph which is a good pace on any bike, especially if you can keep it up!
add a comment |
It will make a significant difference and increase the top end speed for a given cadence noticeably. Gravity is your friend though going downhill, it’s not like the higher gearing of 48x11 will make you way faster downhill, but you would be able to sustain a comfortable cadence on longer, gentle descents before freewheeling
Meanwhile, at the bottom end, you wouldn’t be sacrificing your lowest gear by much and if you’re riding on the road you would have a gear for most hills (28x34 is lower than or comparable to most roadbikes).
The main comparison I would suggest is that 48x11 on 38mm tyres is exactly the same gear ratio as you would have on a road bike with 50x11 top gear and 23mm tyres. You’d just have a slight aerodynamic penalty on the flat bars, which actually benefits in the context of this question when you’re maxing out your cadence on the MTB. Weirdly.
See this table from bikecalc.com when pedalling at 100 rpm in 48x11 you would be travelling at 35 mph which is a good pace on any bike, especially if you can keep it up!
It will make a significant difference and increase the top end speed for a given cadence noticeably. Gravity is your friend though going downhill, it’s not like the higher gearing of 48x11 will make you way faster downhill, but you would be able to sustain a comfortable cadence on longer, gentle descents before freewheeling
Meanwhile, at the bottom end, you wouldn’t be sacrificing your lowest gear by much and if you’re riding on the road you would have a gear for most hills (28x34 is lower than or comparable to most roadbikes).
The main comparison I would suggest is that 48x11 on 38mm tyres is exactly the same gear ratio as you would have on a road bike with 50x11 top gear and 23mm tyres. You’d just have a slight aerodynamic penalty on the flat bars, which actually benefits in the context of this question when you’re maxing out your cadence on the MTB. Weirdly.
See this table from bikecalc.com when pedalling at 100 rpm in 48x11 you would be travelling at 35 mph which is a good pace on any bike, especially if you can keep it up!
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
SwiftySwifty
2,4451424
2,4451424
add a comment |
add a comment |
Aamir Khan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aamir Khan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aamir Khan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aamir Khan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59279%2fhow-much-of-a-difference-would-shifting-from-a-24-34-44-14x28-to-a-28-38-48%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you do a test ride? And what kind of downhills? How long? How steep?
– Andrew Henle
10 hours ago
Unfortunately, no. The area where the shop is located is pretty flat so I can't test it out on the slopes I would usually encounter on my daily route.
– Aamir Khan
7 hours ago
Not a direct answer but 48/11 on 700c wheels is a good fast downhill gear for a hybrid - that's what mine has. It will reach 50km/h at a comfortable cadence (handy for keeping up with cars to make a turn at the bottom of a hill on my old commute). On another note that's a very narrow range on your MTB cassette.
– Chris H
5 hours ago
14-28 sounds like it might be a freewheel not a cassette - can you confirm which it is? A freewheel might not go smaller than 14T
– Criggie♦
3 hours ago