Is it “That's the family that is moving in…” or “That's (they're?) the family who is (are?) moving...

Multi tool use
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I know that 'who' refers to people and 'that' refers to things. But what about when the thing IS people, such as a family? Would I say, "That's the family that is moving in next door soon.", or "That's (they're?) the family who is (are?) moving in next door soon."?
relative-clauses relative-pronouns collective-nouns who who-that
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I know that 'who' refers to people and 'that' refers to things. But what about when the thing IS people, such as a family? Would I say, "That's the family that is moving in next door soon.", or "That's (they're?) the family who is (are?) moving in next door soon."?
relative-clauses relative-pronouns collective-nouns who who-that
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
Anaphoric "that" can refer to anything.
– BillJ
Mar 15 '18 at 19:13
Related: Which is correct: “staff that may have this information” or “staff who may have this information”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 19:59
Also related: Should you use “who” or “that” when talking about multiple people doing something? (ignore the accepted answer), What is the correct relative pronoun for “government”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 20:06
The fact (noted in the answer to the duplicate) that many people think 'that' refers to things, means that many people actually think it is wrong/rude to use 'that' in relation to people. Which will affect its common usage among English speakers. Which needs to be noted. Yes, the 'educated', the 'literate', section of the populace will know what is 'right', but that does not change the concept among the general populace. And concept is everything where language is concerned.
– Nigel J
Mar 15 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
I know that 'who' refers to people and 'that' refers to things. But what about when the thing IS people, such as a family? Would I say, "That's the family that is moving in next door soon.", or "That's (they're?) the family who is (are?) moving in next door soon."?
relative-clauses relative-pronouns collective-nouns who who-that
I know that 'who' refers to people and 'that' refers to things. But what about when the thing IS people, such as a family? Would I say, "That's the family that is moving in next door soon.", or "That's (they're?) the family who is (are?) moving in next door soon."?
relative-clauses relative-pronouns collective-nouns who who-that
relative-clauses relative-pronouns collective-nouns who who-that
edited Mar 15 '18 at 20:09


sumelic
50.5k8121227
50.5k8121227
asked Mar 15 '18 at 19:10
KathyPKathyP
111
111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
Anaphoric "that" can refer to anything.
– BillJ
Mar 15 '18 at 19:13
Related: Which is correct: “staff that may have this information” or “staff who may have this information”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 19:59
Also related: Should you use “who” or “that” when talking about multiple people doing something? (ignore the accepted answer), What is the correct relative pronoun for “government”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 20:06
The fact (noted in the answer to the duplicate) that many people think 'that' refers to things, means that many people actually think it is wrong/rude to use 'that' in relation to people. Which will affect its common usage among English speakers. Which needs to be noted. Yes, the 'educated', the 'literate', section of the populace will know what is 'right', but that does not change the concept among the general populace. And concept is everything where language is concerned.
– Nigel J
Mar 15 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
2
Anaphoric "that" can refer to anything.
– BillJ
Mar 15 '18 at 19:13
Related: Which is correct: “staff that may have this information” or “staff who may have this information”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 19:59
Also related: Should you use “who” or “that” when talking about multiple people doing something? (ignore the accepted answer), What is the correct relative pronoun for “government”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 20:06
The fact (noted in the answer to the duplicate) that many people think 'that' refers to things, means that many people actually think it is wrong/rude to use 'that' in relation to people. Which will affect its common usage among English speakers. Which needs to be noted. Yes, the 'educated', the 'literate', section of the populace will know what is 'right', but that does not change the concept among the general populace. And concept is everything where language is concerned.
– Nigel J
Mar 15 '18 at 22:10
2
2
Anaphoric "that" can refer to anything.
– BillJ
Mar 15 '18 at 19:13
Anaphoric "that" can refer to anything.
– BillJ
Mar 15 '18 at 19:13
Related: Which is correct: “staff that may have this information” or “staff who may have this information”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 19:59
Related: Which is correct: “staff that may have this information” or “staff who may have this information”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 19:59
Also related: Should you use “who” or “that” when talking about multiple people doing something? (ignore the accepted answer), What is the correct relative pronoun for “government”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 20:06
Also related: Should you use “who” or “that” when talking about multiple people doing something? (ignore the accepted answer), What is the correct relative pronoun for “government”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 20:06
The fact (noted in the answer to the duplicate) that many people think 'that' refers to things, means that many people actually think it is wrong/rude to use 'that' in relation to people. Which will affect its common usage among English speakers. Which needs to be noted. Yes, the 'educated', the 'literate', section of the populace will know what is 'right', but that does not change the concept among the general populace. And concept is everything where language is concerned.
– Nigel J
Mar 15 '18 at 22:10
The fact (noted in the answer to the duplicate) that many people think 'that' refers to things, means that many people actually think it is wrong/rude to use 'that' in relation to people. Which will affect its common usage among English speakers. Which needs to be noted. Yes, the 'educated', the 'literate', section of the populace will know what is 'right', but that does not change the concept among the general populace. And concept is everything where language is concerned.
– Nigel J
Mar 15 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can substitute "that" for "who" in relative clauses when the clause is identifying. If the clause is non-identifying, then "that" is not permissible.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435638%2fis-it-thats-the-family-that-is-moving-in-or-thats-theyre-the-family%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can substitute "that" for "who" in relative clauses when the clause is identifying. If the clause is non-identifying, then "that" is not permissible.
add a comment |
You can substitute "that" for "who" in relative clauses when the clause is identifying. If the clause is non-identifying, then "that" is not permissible.
add a comment |
You can substitute "that" for "who" in relative clauses when the clause is identifying. If the clause is non-identifying, then "that" is not permissible.
You can substitute "that" for "who" in relative clauses when the clause is identifying. If the clause is non-identifying, then "that" is not permissible.
answered Mar 15 '18 at 19:22
jpyvrjpyvr
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435638%2fis-it-thats-the-family-that-is-moving-in-or-thats-theyre-the-family%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1uPbfm4unm37o36aFX633CU7L1GLnOY,1ulkBmDwu edoD
2
Anaphoric "that" can refer to anything.
– BillJ
Mar 15 '18 at 19:13
Related: Which is correct: “staff that may have this information” or “staff who may have this information”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 19:59
Also related: Should you use “who” or “that” when talking about multiple people doing something? (ignore the accepted answer), What is the correct relative pronoun for “government”?
– sumelic
Mar 15 '18 at 20:06
The fact (noted in the answer to the duplicate) that many people think 'that' refers to things, means that many people actually think it is wrong/rude to use 'that' in relation to people. Which will affect its common usage among English speakers. Which needs to be noted. Yes, the 'educated', the 'literate', section of the populace will know what is 'right', but that does not change the concept among the general populace. And concept is everything where language is concerned.
– Nigel J
Mar 15 '18 at 22:10