“Must have done” meaning












4















Some days ago I got a sentence on my lesson, which I had to rephrase. The sentence was:




“I m sure, that the Smiths bought this house”




And I said




“ The Smiths must have bought this house”.




My teacher made me feel confused about it, because she said that it was wrong. Is she right?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Your sentence does not include anything about you being sure.

    – Michael Harvey
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    The punctuation in the example could be improved. There should be no comma after "that" and "I'm" should have an apostrophe.

    – James K
    3 hours ago











  • Did teacher give the "correct" answer that you should have written? @JamesK explained why "must have bought this house" is based on evidence or your own reasoning, and based on that I agree that your version isn't an exact re-wording of the original, but it's unclear what the teacher was actually expecting. Without any contextual information I don't know (as a native speaker) how I would rephrase that "I'm sure that the Smiths bought this house"! ETA: if she didn't, I would (in your position) ask for what she thinks the 'right' answer is!

    – seventyeightist
    3 hours ago


















4















Some days ago I got a sentence on my lesson, which I had to rephrase. The sentence was:




“I m sure, that the Smiths bought this house”




And I said




“ The Smiths must have bought this house”.




My teacher made me feel confused about it, because she said that it was wrong. Is she right?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Your sentence does not include anything about you being sure.

    – Michael Harvey
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    The punctuation in the example could be improved. There should be no comma after "that" and "I'm" should have an apostrophe.

    – James K
    3 hours ago











  • Did teacher give the "correct" answer that you should have written? @JamesK explained why "must have bought this house" is based on evidence or your own reasoning, and based on that I agree that your version isn't an exact re-wording of the original, but it's unclear what the teacher was actually expecting. Without any contextual information I don't know (as a native speaker) how I would rephrase that "I'm sure that the Smiths bought this house"! ETA: if she didn't, I would (in your position) ask for what she thinks the 'right' answer is!

    – seventyeightist
    3 hours ago
















4












4








4








Some days ago I got a sentence on my lesson, which I had to rephrase. The sentence was:




“I m sure, that the Smiths bought this house”




And I said




“ The Smiths must have bought this house”.




My teacher made me feel confused about it, because she said that it was wrong. Is she right?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Some days ago I got a sentence on my lesson, which I had to rephrase. The sentence was:




“I m sure, that the Smiths bought this house”




And I said




“ The Smiths must have bought this house”.




My teacher made me feel confused about it, because she said that it was wrong. Is she right?







grammar






share|improve this question









New contributor




Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









James K

35.6k13887




35.6k13887






New contributor




Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









Влад СтороженкоВлад Стороженко

211




211




New contributor




Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Влад Стороженко is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Your sentence does not include anything about you being sure.

    – Michael Harvey
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    The punctuation in the example could be improved. There should be no comma after "that" and "I'm" should have an apostrophe.

    – James K
    3 hours ago











  • Did teacher give the "correct" answer that you should have written? @JamesK explained why "must have bought this house" is based on evidence or your own reasoning, and based on that I agree that your version isn't an exact re-wording of the original, but it's unclear what the teacher was actually expecting. Without any contextual information I don't know (as a native speaker) how I would rephrase that "I'm sure that the Smiths bought this house"! ETA: if she didn't, I would (in your position) ask for what she thinks the 'right' answer is!

    – seventyeightist
    3 hours ago





















  • Your sentence does not include anything about you being sure.

    – Michael Harvey
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    The punctuation in the example could be improved. There should be no comma after "that" and "I'm" should have an apostrophe.

    – James K
    3 hours ago











  • Did teacher give the "correct" answer that you should have written? @JamesK explained why "must have bought this house" is based on evidence or your own reasoning, and based on that I agree that your version isn't an exact re-wording of the original, but it's unclear what the teacher was actually expecting. Without any contextual information I don't know (as a native speaker) how I would rephrase that "I'm sure that the Smiths bought this house"! ETA: if she didn't, I would (in your position) ask for what she thinks the 'right' answer is!

    – seventyeightist
    3 hours ago



















Your sentence does not include anything about you being sure.

– Michael Harvey
6 hours ago





Your sentence does not include anything about you being sure.

– Michael Harvey
6 hours ago




1




1





The punctuation in the example could be improved. There should be no comma after "that" and "I'm" should have an apostrophe.

– James K
3 hours ago





The punctuation in the example could be improved. There should be no comma after "that" and "I'm" should have an apostrophe.

– James K
3 hours ago













Did teacher give the "correct" answer that you should have written? @JamesK explained why "must have bought this house" is based on evidence or your own reasoning, and based on that I agree that your version isn't an exact re-wording of the original, but it's unclear what the teacher was actually expecting. Without any contextual information I don't know (as a native speaker) how I would rephrase that "I'm sure that the Smiths bought this house"! ETA: if she didn't, I would (in your position) ask for what she thinks the 'right' answer is!

– seventyeightist
3 hours ago







Did teacher give the "correct" answer that you should have written? @JamesK explained why "must have bought this house" is based on evidence or your own reasoning, and based on that I agree that your version isn't an exact re-wording of the original, but it's unclear what the teacher was actually expecting. Without any contextual information I don't know (as a native speaker) how I would rephrase that "I'm sure that the Smiths bought this house"! ETA: if she didn't, I would (in your position) ask for what she thinks the 'right' answer is!

– seventyeightist
3 hours ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














When you paraphrase you hope to give a sentence with similar meaning. There are very few pairs of sentences with exactly the same meaning, register, tone and nuance.



"Must have" is used to indicate deductions or conclusions from evidence.




The pavement is wet, it must have been raining




It implies that you did not directly observe the rain, and so suggests slight doubt:




It must have been raining.

No, I think the kids have been playing with water.




There is a similar effect from adding "I'm sure..." or "... definitely ...". The fact you feel the need to say "I'm sure" actually makes it sound less certain. Compare:




Peter is a good boy. (simple assertion)

I'm sure that Peter is a good boy. (Why do you need to say this, unless there was some doubt).




Saying "The Smiths must have bought this house" means that you have worked it out from evidence and reasoning. It is close in meaning to "I'm sure that the Smiths have bought this house." I'd accept it as a reasonable paraphrase, though not exactly the same.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Влад Стороженко is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196012%2fmust-have-done-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    When you paraphrase you hope to give a sentence with similar meaning. There are very few pairs of sentences with exactly the same meaning, register, tone and nuance.



    "Must have" is used to indicate deductions or conclusions from evidence.




    The pavement is wet, it must have been raining




    It implies that you did not directly observe the rain, and so suggests slight doubt:




    It must have been raining.

    No, I think the kids have been playing with water.




    There is a similar effect from adding "I'm sure..." or "... definitely ...". The fact you feel the need to say "I'm sure" actually makes it sound less certain. Compare:




    Peter is a good boy. (simple assertion)

    I'm sure that Peter is a good boy. (Why do you need to say this, unless there was some doubt).




    Saying "The Smiths must have bought this house" means that you have worked it out from evidence and reasoning. It is close in meaning to "I'm sure that the Smiths have bought this house." I'd accept it as a reasonable paraphrase, though not exactly the same.






    share|improve this answer




























      8














      When you paraphrase you hope to give a sentence with similar meaning. There are very few pairs of sentences with exactly the same meaning, register, tone and nuance.



      "Must have" is used to indicate deductions or conclusions from evidence.




      The pavement is wet, it must have been raining




      It implies that you did not directly observe the rain, and so suggests slight doubt:




      It must have been raining.

      No, I think the kids have been playing with water.




      There is a similar effect from adding "I'm sure..." or "... definitely ...". The fact you feel the need to say "I'm sure" actually makes it sound less certain. Compare:




      Peter is a good boy. (simple assertion)

      I'm sure that Peter is a good boy. (Why do you need to say this, unless there was some doubt).




      Saying "The Smiths must have bought this house" means that you have worked it out from evidence and reasoning. It is close in meaning to "I'm sure that the Smiths have bought this house." I'd accept it as a reasonable paraphrase, though not exactly the same.






      share|improve this answer


























        8












        8








        8







        When you paraphrase you hope to give a sentence with similar meaning. There are very few pairs of sentences with exactly the same meaning, register, tone and nuance.



        "Must have" is used to indicate deductions or conclusions from evidence.




        The pavement is wet, it must have been raining




        It implies that you did not directly observe the rain, and so suggests slight doubt:




        It must have been raining.

        No, I think the kids have been playing with water.




        There is a similar effect from adding "I'm sure..." or "... definitely ...". The fact you feel the need to say "I'm sure" actually makes it sound less certain. Compare:




        Peter is a good boy. (simple assertion)

        I'm sure that Peter is a good boy. (Why do you need to say this, unless there was some doubt).




        Saying "The Smiths must have bought this house" means that you have worked it out from evidence and reasoning. It is close in meaning to "I'm sure that the Smiths have bought this house." I'd accept it as a reasonable paraphrase, though not exactly the same.






        share|improve this answer













        When you paraphrase you hope to give a sentence with similar meaning. There are very few pairs of sentences with exactly the same meaning, register, tone and nuance.



        "Must have" is used to indicate deductions or conclusions from evidence.




        The pavement is wet, it must have been raining




        It implies that you did not directly observe the rain, and so suggests slight doubt:




        It must have been raining.

        No, I think the kids have been playing with water.




        There is a similar effect from adding "I'm sure..." or "... definitely ...". The fact you feel the need to say "I'm sure" actually makes it sound less certain. Compare:




        Peter is a good boy. (simple assertion)

        I'm sure that Peter is a good boy. (Why do you need to say this, unless there was some doubt).




        Saying "The Smiths must have bought this house" means that you have worked it out from evidence and reasoning. It is close in meaning to "I'm sure that the Smiths have bought this house." I'd accept it as a reasonable paraphrase, though not exactly the same.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        James KJames K

        35.6k13887




        35.6k13887






















            Влад Стороженко is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Влад Стороженко is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Влад Стороженко is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Влад Стороженко is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196012%2fmust-have-done-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Рижское политехническое училище

            Красноярск

            Is there a gender-neutral alternative to workmanlike suitable for use in legal context?