Potential by Assembling Charges












1












$begingroup$


For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



Approach 1:



$$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



$$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



Approach 2:
$$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
$$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
$$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



Potential at the surface would be $$V = int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} =frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



Why is the answer different in both the cases?






electrostatics potential







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
    In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



    Approach 1:



    $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



    $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
    Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



    Approach 2:
    $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
    $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
    $$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



    Potential at the surface would be $$V = int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} =frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



    Why is the answer different in both the cases?






    electrostatics potential







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
      In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



      Approach 1:



      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Approach 2:
      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      $$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



      Potential at the surface would be $$V = int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} =frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Why is the answer different in both the cases?






      electrostatics potential







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
      In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



      Approach 1:



      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Approach 2:
      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      $$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



      Potential at the surface would be $$V = int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} =frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Why is the answer different in both the cases?






      electrostatics potential




      electrostatics potential






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      K. TK. T

      364




      364






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
            $endgroup$
            – K. T
            13 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471655%2fpotential-by-assembling-charges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              13 mins ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              13 mins ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 44 mins ago









            TojrahTojrah

            2077




            2077












            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              13 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              13 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
            $endgroup$
            – K. T
            13 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
            $endgroup$
            – K. T
            13 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 19 mins ago

























                answered 41 mins ago









                Nobody recognizeableNobody recognizeable

                647617




                647617






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471655%2fpotential-by-assembling-charges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Усть-Каменогорск

                    Image
                    У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. Усть-Каменогорск. Город Усть-Каменогорск каз. Өскемен Флаг Герб 49°57′ с. ш. 82°37′ в. д. H G Я O L Страна Казахстан   Казахстан Статус областной центр Область Восточно-Казахстанская Аким Жаксылык Омар [1] История и география Основан 1720 Город с 1868 Площадь 303,15 [2] км² Высота центра 283 ± 1 м Тип климата резко-континентальный Часовой пояс UTC+6 Население Население 329 090 [3]  человек ( 2018 ) Национальности русские 53,56 % казахи 42,99 % немцы 0,82 % украинцы 0,57 % татары 0,79 % белорусы 0,14 % азербайджанцы 0,23 % корейцы 0,20 % прочие 1,08 % -1 шт [4] Этнохороним усть-каменогорцы, усть-каменогорец Цифровые идентификаторы Телефонный код +7 (7232) Почтовый индекс F0***** [5] Автомобильный код 16 (ранее F) oskemen.kz Усть-Каменогорск Усть-Каменогорск ...
                    Read more

                    Халкинская богословская школа

                    Image
                    Халкинская богословская школа тур. Rum Ortodoks Ruhban Okulu греч. Ιερά Θεολογική Σχολή της Χάλκης Главное здание Халкинской школы Международное название Theological School of Halki Год основания 1844 Конфессия православие Церковь Константинопольская Ректор Елпидифор (Ламбриниадис) Расположение о. Хейбелиада, Турция Юридический адрес Ümit tepesi No 5, 34973 Heybeliada, Istanbul, Turkey Сайт www.greece.org  [[commons:Category:Halki seminary|Халкинская богословская школа тур. Rum Ortodoks Ruhban Okulu греч. Ιερά Θεολογική Σχολή της Χάλκης на Викискладе]] Ха́лкинская богосло́вская шко́ла (или Духовная семинария на Халки , тур. Rum Ortodoks Ruhban Okulu , греч. Ιερά Θεολογική Σχολή της Χάλκης ) — недействующее среднее специальное учебное заведение Константинопольской православной церкви, расположенное на территории Свято-Троицкого мужского монастыря на вершине холма Надежды (тур. Ümit Tepesi ) острова Хейбелиада, в Турции....
                    Read more

                    Высокополье (Харьковская область)

                    Image
                    У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. Высокополье. Село Высокополье укр. Високопілля Герб 49°55′07″ с. ш. 35°25′13″ в. д. H G Я O L Страна Украина   Украина Область Харьковская Район Валковский Сельский совет Высокопольский История и география Основан 1670 Прежние названия Хмелевое Площадь 55,56 км² Часовой пояс UTC+2, летом UTC+3 Население Население 1957 человек ( 2001 ) Плотность 35,220 чел./км² Цифровые идентификаторы Телефонный код +380 5753 Почтовый индекс 63020 Автомобильный код AX, КХ / 21 КОАТУУ 6321281501 Высокополье Высокополье Высокополье  Аудио, фото и видео на Викискладе Высокопо́лье (укр. Високопілля ) — село, Высокопольский сельский совет, Валковский район, Харьковская область, Украина. Код КОАТУУ — 6321281501. Население по переписи 2001 г. составляет 1957 (866/1091 м/ж) человек. Является административным центр...
                    Read more