Word for working with two parallel work instruction system in a company

Multi tool use
If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.
What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.
Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.
It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.
single-word-requests phrases expressions idioms
add a comment |
If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.
What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.
Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.
It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.
single-word-requests phrases expressions idioms
Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.
– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02
There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?
– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19
@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.
– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03
add a comment |
If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.
What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.
Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.
It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.
single-word-requests phrases expressions idioms
If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.
What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.
Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.
It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.
single-word-requests phrases expressions idioms
single-word-requests phrases expressions idioms
asked Sep 27 '18 at 8:15
AMNAMN
1,2942925
1,2942925
Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.
– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02
There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?
– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19
@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.
– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03
add a comment |
Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.
– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02
There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?
– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19
@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.
– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03
Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.
– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02
Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.
– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02
There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?
– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19
There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?
– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19
@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.
– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03
@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.
– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:
"In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465861%2fword-for-working-with-two-parallel-work-instruction-system-in-a-company%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:
"In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."
add a comment |
These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:
"In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."
add a comment |
These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:
"In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."
These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:
"In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."
answered 5 mins ago
Trevor ReidTrevor Reid
1266
1266
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465861%2fword-for-working-with-two-parallel-work-instruction-system-in-a-company%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Waf,ar3g,MdWDVYidcc,2ihNh,9VEqHIa
Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.
– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02
There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?
– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19
@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.
– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03