Word for working with two parallel work instruction system in a company












1















If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.



What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.



Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.



It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.










share|improve this question























  • Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.

    – Kris
    Sep 27 '18 at 9:02











  • There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?

    – Jason Bassford
    Sep 27 '18 at 10:19











  • @Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.

    – AMN
    Sep 27 '18 at 11:03
















1















If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.



What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.



Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.



It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.










share|improve this question























  • Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.

    – Kris
    Sep 27 '18 at 9:02











  • There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?

    – Jason Bassford
    Sep 27 '18 at 10:19











  • @Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.

    – AMN
    Sep 27 '18 at 11:03














1












1








1








If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.



What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.



Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.



It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.










share|improve this question














If living two lives, one for outside world and other in the closet is double life.



What would you call preferably pejoratively for when employees are working with two procedures rule book & guidelines in parallel as in, one from the previous (departed) owners of the company (recent as between 1-6 months) and other from now a new procedure guidelines/instructions from the new owners after a takeover.



Example: In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employees themselves have to work with ___________ (parallel systems) to suffice the company commitments since the new management has simply dumped their existing system from their other company on these employees, which is tough to execute in order to do daily business while there has never been a familiarization or transition process.



It is as though a equivalent of "living double lives" but in the company's procedural work instruction business sphere.







single-word-requests phrases expressions idioms






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 27 '18 at 8:15









AMNAMN

1,2942925




1,2942925













  • Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.

    – Kris
    Sep 27 '18 at 9:02











  • There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?

    – Jason Bassford
    Sep 27 '18 at 10:19











  • @Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.

    – AMN
    Sep 27 '18 at 11:03



















  • Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.

    – Kris
    Sep 27 '18 at 9:02











  • There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?

    – Jason Bassford
    Sep 27 '18 at 10:19











  • @Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.

    – AMN
    Sep 27 '18 at 11:03

















Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.

– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02





Btw, there's nothing parallel, the new system supersedes and replaces the old. There may be no transition period; if so there will be issues, which is a different matter.

– Kris
Sep 27 '18 at 9:02













There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?

– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19





There's nothing wrong with parallel systems, especially if they are using both at the same time—even if incorrectly. (That's what parallel means.) Why do you think it doesn't work?

– Jason Bassford
Sep 27 '18 at 10:19













@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.

– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03





@Kris The current situation is that both the systems are used in parallel instead of one (the older but the better/easier one) being redundant and employees are discontent with the double jobs they have to do because of the inaction of the few old toothless middle management existing since the old owners. While the old easier system helps the old middle management in decision making, the new system is utilized to help satisfy the new seagull type management for the sake of audits compliance.

– AMN
Sep 27 '18 at 11:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:




"In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."






share























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465861%2fword-for-working-with-two-parallel-work-instruction-system-in-a-company%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:




    "In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."






    share




























      0














      These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:




      "In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."






      share


























        0












        0








        0







        These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:




        "In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."






        share













        These would be concurrent work instructions. Saying so is not neccessarily pejorative. But it's not hard to get there:




        "In order to meet the daily requirements of the company, the employess must adhere to six concurrent―and bizarrly incongruent―directives."







        share











        share


        share










        answered 5 mins ago









        Trevor ReidTrevor Reid

        1266




        1266






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465861%2fword-for-working-with-two-parallel-work-instruction-system-in-a-company%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Усть-Каменогорск

            Халкинская богословская школа

            Where does the word Sparryheid come from and mean?