Why is it “in the university” rather than “at the university” in these examples?












5















The title of an 1848 book is The Organization of Industry, Explained in a Course of Lectures Delivered in the University of Cambridge in Easter Term 1844.



The cover page of this 1864 book states that William Edward Hearn is "Professor of History and Political Economy in the University of Melbourne".



But according to the answer here, it should be at the university. Was this just some archaic 19th century thing and we now always use "at the university" rather than "in the university" in these contexts? Or was there something special about the above contexts?










share|improve this question


















  • 8





    These were written in 1848 and 1864. Look at this Google Ngram. Usage has changed in the last 150 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:21








  • 2





    Oh my goodness @Peter Shor thanks for bringing to my attention the Google Ngram! What an amazing tool

    – MotherBrain
    Sep 17 '18 at 2:14
















5















The title of an 1848 book is The Organization of Industry, Explained in a Course of Lectures Delivered in the University of Cambridge in Easter Term 1844.



The cover page of this 1864 book states that William Edward Hearn is "Professor of History and Political Economy in the University of Melbourne".



But according to the answer here, it should be at the university. Was this just some archaic 19th century thing and we now always use "at the university" rather than "in the university" in these contexts? Or was there something special about the above contexts?










share|improve this question


















  • 8





    These were written in 1848 and 1864. Look at this Google Ngram. Usage has changed in the last 150 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:21








  • 2





    Oh my goodness @Peter Shor thanks for bringing to my attention the Google Ngram! What an amazing tool

    – MotherBrain
    Sep 17 '18 at 2:14














5












5








5


2






The title of an 1848 book is The Organization of Industry, Explained in a Course of Lectures Delivered in the University of Cambridge in Easter Term 1844.



The cover page of this 1864 book states that William Edward Hearn is "Professor of History and Political Economy in the University of Melbourne".



But according to the answer here, it should be at the university. Was this just some archaic 19th century thing and we now always use "at the university" rather than "in the university" in these contexts? Or was there something special about the above contexts?










share|improve this question














The title of an 1848 book is The Organization of Industry, Explained in a Course of Lectures Delivered in the University of Cambridge in Easter Term 1844.



The cover page of this 1864 book states that William Edward Hearn is "Professor of History and Political Economy in the University of Melbourne".



But according to the answer here, it should be at the university. Was this just some archaic 19th century thing and we now always use "at the university" rather than "in the university" in these contexts? Or was there something special about the above contexts?







prepositions






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 20 '17 at 0:33









Kenny LJKenny LJ

1,398133549




1,398133549








  • 8





    These were written in 1848 and 1864. Look at this Google Ngram. Usage has changed in the last 150 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:21








  • 2





    Oh my goodness @Peter Shor thanks for bringing to my attention the Google Ngram! What an amazing tool

    – MotherBrain
    Sep 17 '18 at 2:14














  • 8





    These were written in 1848 and 1864. Look at this Google Ngram. Usage has changed in the last 150 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:21








  • 2





    Oh my goodness @Peter Shor thanks for bringing to my attention the Google Ngram! What an amazing tool

    – MotherBrain
    Sep 17 '18 at 2:14








8




8





These were written in 1848 and 1864. Look at this Google Ngram. Usage has changed in the last 150 years.

– Peter Shor
Dec 20 '17 at 3:21







These were written in 1848 and 1864. Look at this Google Ngram. Usage has changed in the last 150 years.

– Peter Shor
Dec 20 '17 at 3:21






2




2





Oh my goodness @Peter Shor thanks for bringing to my attention the Google Ngram! What an amazing tool

– MotherBrain
Sep 17 '18 at 2:14





Oh my goodness @Peter Shor thanks for bringing to my attention the Google Ngram! What an amazing tool

– MotherBrain
Sep 17 '18 at 2:14










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














The universities of Cambridge and Oxford are rather peculiar in the British education system, in that they are associations of independent colleges, rather than unified bodies. This may be why the preposition in was used, rather than at. However, writing styles change over the years. Also, it may just have been the author's preference, rather than a matter of convention. You are right, though: today, at would be used for any university, including Oxford and Cambridge.



Note, however, that we still (sometimes) use the term "going up to Cambridge/Oxford, and being "sent down" if you are expelled for bad behaviour. The only explanation for this that I am familiar with is that you travelled to Oxford/Cambridge from London on an "up train", and returned to London on a "down train" (both common terms in the past, but out of use today).






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    But it's not just Oxbridge. I gave the example of Melbourne. I can easily find many more examples if you want.

    – Kenny LJ
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:38











  • @KennyLJ Oh, well! That blows my theory out of the water. I hadn't noticed your reference to Melbourne. Let's see if anyone can dispatch my explanation of up/down.

    – Mick
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:41













  • The comment by @PeterShor coincides with my experience of the language. Preposition usage changes over time. People in the USA used to be born at a city (at New York, for example). Nowadays it's in a city. If you read something 150+ years old don't expect to find the same usage as today.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:02











  • In addition it's possible (although I have no solid evidence) that in the mid-19th centuries, universities were still considered to be people (scholars), not places or buildings.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:04








  • 1





    @Clare Oddly enough, I was listening to a lecture last night, and the speaker referred to another academic as "Dr (name) out of (university)". Now all I have to do is remember what lecture it was.

    – Mick
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:12



















0














"lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge": Here we are talking about the location. Where were the lectures delivered? Answer: In the University of Cambridge. Here we know that the venue for these lectures was the University of Cambridge.



"lectures delivered at the University of Cambridge": Here the focus is on the institution. These lectures might or might not have been delivered in the university campus. But they were facilitated by the institution (University of Cambridge) as maybe a part of their curriculum or special lecture series or some other similar program.





share























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f423019%2fwhy-is-it-in-the-university-rather-than-at-the-university-in-these-examples%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    The universities of Cambridge and Oxford are rather peculiar in the British education system, in that they are associations of independent colleges, rather than unified bodies. This may be why the preposition in was used, rather than at. However, writing styles change over the years. Also, it may just have been the author's preference, rather than a matter of convention. You are right, though: today, at would be used for any university, including Oxford and Cambridge.



    Note, however, that we still (sometimes) use the term "going up to Cambridge/Oxford, and being "sent down" if you are expelled for bad behaviour. The only explanation for this that I am familiar with is that you travelled to Oxford/Cambridge from London on an "up train", and returned to London on a "down train" (both common terms in the past, but out of use today).






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      But it's not just Oxbridge. I gave the example of Melbourne. I can easily find many more examples if you want.

      – Kenny LJ
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:38











    • @KennyLJ Oh, well! That blows my theory out of the water. I hadn't noticed your reference to Melbourne. Let's see if anyone can dispatch my explanation of up/down.

      – Mick
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:41













    • The comment by @PeterShor coincides with my experience of the language. Preposition usage changes over time. People in the USA used to be born at a city (at New York, for example). Nowadays it's in a city. If you read something 150+ years old don't expect to find the same usage as today.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:02











    • In addition it's possible (although I have no solid evidence) that in the mid-19th centuries, universities were still considered to be people (scholars), not places or buildings.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:04








    • 1





      @Clare Oddly enough, I was listening to a lecture last night, and the speaker referred to another academic as "Dr (name) out of (university)". Now all I have to do is remember what lecture it was.

      – Mick
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:12
















    0














    The universities of Cambridge and Oxford are rather peculiar in the British education system, in that they are associations of independent colleges, rather than unified bodies. This may be why the preposition in was used, rather than at. However, writing styles change over the years. Also, it may just have been the author's preference, rather than a matter of convention. You are right, though: today, at would be used for any university, including Oxford and Cambridge.



    Note, however, that we still (sometimes) use the term "going up to Cambridge/Oxford, and being "sent down" if you are expelled for bad behaviour. The only explanation for this that I am familiar with is that you travelled to Oxford/Cambridge from London on an "up train", and returned to London on a "down train" (both common terms in the past, but out of use today).






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      But it's not just Oxbridge. I gave the example of Melbourne. I can easily find many more examples if you want.

      – Kenny LJ
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:38











    • @KennyLJ Oh, well! That blows my theory out of the water. I hadn't noticed your reference to Melbourne. Let's see if anyone can dispatch my explanation of up/down.

      – Mick
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:41













    • The comment by @PeterShor coincides with my experience of the language. Preposition usage changes over time. People in the USA used to be born at a city (at New York, for example). Nowadays it's in a city. If you read something 150+ years old don't expect to find the same usage as today.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:02











    • In addition it's possible (although I have no solid evidence) that in the mid-19th centuries, universities were still considered to be people (scholars), not places or buildings.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:04








    • 1





      @Clare Oddly enough, I was listening to a lecture last night, and the speaker referred to another academic as "Dr (name) out of (university)". Now all I have to do is remember what lecture it was.

      – Mick
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:12














    0












    0








    0







    The universities of Cambridge and Oxford are rather peculiar in the British education system, in that they are associations of independent colleges, rather than unified bodies. This may be why the preposition in was used, rather than at. However, writing styles change over the years. Also, it may just have been the author's preference, rather than a matter of convention. You are right, though: today, at would be used for any university, including Oxford and Cambridge.



    Note, however, that we still (sometimes) use the term "going up to Cambridge/Oxford, and being "sent down" if you are expelled for bad behaviour. The only explanation for this that I am familiar with is that you travelled to Oxford/Cambridge from London on an "up train", and returned to London on a "down train" (both common terms in the past, but out of use today).






    share|improve this answer













    The universities of Cambridge and Oxford are rather peculiar in the British education system, in that they are associations of independent colleges, rather than unified bodies. This may be why the preposition in was used, rather than at. However, writing styles change over the years. Also, it may just have been the author's preference, rather than a matter of convention. You are right, though: today, at would be used for any university, including Oxford and Cambridge.



    Note, however, that we still (sometimes) use the term "going up to Cambridge/Oxford, and being "sent down" if you are expelled for bad behaviour. The only explanation for this that I am familiar with is that you travelled to Oxford/Cambridge from London on an "up train", and returned to London on a "down train" (both common terms in the past, but out of use today).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Dec 20 '17 at 3:19









    MickMick

    7,91811239




    7,91811239








    • 1





      But it's not just Oxbridge. I gave the example of Melbourne. I can easily find many more examples if you want.

      – Kenny LJ
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:38











    • @KennyLJ Oh, well! That blows my theory out of the water. I hadn't noticed your reference to Melbourne. Let's see if anyone can dispatch my explanation of up/down.

      – Mick
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:41













    • The comment by @PeterShor coincides with my experience of the language. Preposition usage changes over time. People in the USA used to be born at a city (at New York, for example). Nowadays it's in a city. If you read something 150+ years old don't expect to find the same usage as today.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:02











    • In addition it's possible (although I have no solid evidence) that in the mid-19th centuries, universities were still considered to be people (scholars), not places or buildings.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:04








    • 1





      @Clare Oddly enough, I was listening to a lecture last night, and the speaker referred to another academic as "Dr (name) out of (university)". Now all I have to do is remember what lecture it was.

      – Mick
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:12














    • 1





      But it's not just Oxbridge. I gave the example of Melbourne. I can easily find many more examples if you want.

      – Kenny LJ
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:38











    • @KennyLJ Oh, well! That blows my theory out of the water. I hadn't noticed your reference to Melbourne. Let's see if anyone can dispatch my explanation of up/down.

      – Mick
      Dec 20 '17 at 3:41













    • The comment by @PeterShor coincides with my experience of the language. Preposition usage changes over time. People in the USA used to be born at a city (at New York, for example). Nowadays it's in a city. If you read something 150+ years old don't expect to find the same usage as today.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:02











    • In addition it's possible (although I have no solid evidence) that in the mid-19th centuries, universities were still considered to be people (scholars), not places or buildings.

      – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:04








    • 1





      @Clare Oddly enough, I was listening to a lecture last night, and the speaker referred to another academic as "Dr (name) out of (university)". Now all I have to do is remember what lecture it was.

      – Mick
      Dec 21 '17 at 0:12








    1




    1





    But it's not just Oxbridge. I gave the example of Melbourne. I can easily find many more examples if you want.

    – Kenny LJ
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:38





    But it's not just Oxbridge. I gave the example of Melbourne. I can easily find many more examples if you want.

    – Kenny LJ
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:38













    @KennyLJ Oh, well! That blows my theory out of the water. I hadn't noticed your reference to Melbourne. Let's see if anyone can dispatch my explanation of up/down.

    – Mick
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:41







    @KennyLJ Oh, well! That blows my theory out of the water. I hadn't noticed your reference to Melbourne. Let's see if anyone can dispatch my explanation of up/down.

    – Mick
    Dec 20 '17 at 3:41















    The comment by @PeterShor coincides with my experience of the language. Preposition usage changes over time. People in the USA used to be born at a city (at New York, for example). Nowadays it's in a city. If you read something 150+ years old don't expect to find the same usage as today.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:02





    The comment by @PeterShor coincides with my experience of the language. Preposition usage changes over time. People in the USA used to be born at a city (at New York, for example). Nowadays it's in a city. If you read something 150+ years old don't expect to find the same usage as today.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:02













    In addition it's possible (although I have no solid evidence) that in the mid-19th centuries, universities were still considered to be people (scholars), not places or buildings.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:04







    In addition it's possible (although I have no solid evidence) that in the mid-19th centuries, universities were still considered to be people (scholars), not places or buildings.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:04






    1




    1





    @Clare Oddly enough, I was listening to a lecture last night, and the speaker referred to another academic as "Dr (name) out of (university)". Now all I have to do is remember what lecture it was.

    – Mick
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:12





    @Clare Oddly enough, I was listening to a lecture last night, and the speaker referred to another academic as "Dr (name) out of (university)". Now all I have to do is remember what lecture it was.

    – Mick
    Dec 21 '17 at 0:12













    0














    "lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge": Here we are talking about the location. Where were the lectures delivered? Answer: In the University of Cambridge. Here we know that the venue for these lectures was the University of Cambridge.



    "lectures delivered at the University of Cambridge": Here the focus is on the institution. These lectures might or might not have been delivered in the university campus. But they were facilitated by the institution (University of Cambridge) as maybe a part of their curriculum or special lecture series or some other similar program.





    share




























      0














      "lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge": Here we are talking about the location. Where were the lectures delivered? Answer: In the University of Cambridge. Here we know that the venue for these lectures was the University of Cambridge.



      "lectures delivered at the University of Cambridge": Here the focus is on the institution. These lectures might or might not have been delivered in the university campus. But they were facilitated by the institution (University of Cambridge) as maybe a part of their curriculum or special lecture series or some other similar program.





      share


























        0












        0








        0







        "lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge": Here we are talking about the location. Where were the lectures delivered? Answer: In the University of Cambridge. Here we know that the venue for these lectures was the University of Cambridge.



        "lectures delivered at the University of Cambridge": Here the focus is on the institution. These lectures might or might not have been delivered in the university campus. But they were facilitated by the institution (University of Cambridge) as maybe a part of their curriculum or special lecture series or some other similar program.





        share













        "lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge": Here we are talking about the location. Where were the lectures delivered? Answer: In the University of Cambridge. Here we know that the venue for these lectures was the University of Cambridge.



        "lectures delivered at the University of Cambridge": Here the focus is on the institution. These lectures might or might not have been delivered in the university campus. But they were facilitated by the institution (University of Cambridge) as maybe a part of their curriculum or special lecture series or some other similar program.






        share











        share


        share










        answered 6 mins ago









        amruta hamruta h

        853




        853






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f423019%2fwhy-is-it-in-the-university-rather-than-at-the-university-in-these-examples%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Усть-Каменогорск

            Халкинская богословская школа

            Where does the word Sparryheid come from and mean?