Is the spelling fundraising, fund-raising or fund raising?

Multi tool use
I have seen different spellings for fundraising and would like to know the current best practice. The history of this word/phrase is also of interest to me.
punctuation orthography hyphenation variants
add a comment |
I have seen different spellings for fundraising and would like to know the current best practice. The history of this word/phrase is also of interest to me.
punctuation orthography hyphenation variants
I think the etymology of this word is rather obvious: started off as two words, fund raising, and then, over time, people used it enough that it became one word, fundraising. As with almost all hyphenation-versus-one-word questions, it is completely optional whether you hyphenate or not.
– BladorthinTheGrey
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
1
@BladorthinTheGrey I don't think it is correct to call English or any other language "obvious". Even the very strict formal languages used in computer programming have to be documented with detailed grammars to ensure they are correctly implemented. For example, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford dictionaries spell "ice cream" as two words despite its huge popularity. And as Sven Yargs has shown, these choices can change over time.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:30
add a comment |
I have seen different spellings for fundraising and would like to know the current best practice. The history of this word/phrase is also of interest to me.
punctuation orthography hyphenation variants
I have seen different spellings for fundraising and would like to know the current best practice. The history of this word/phrase is also of interest to me.
punctuation orthography hyphenation variants
punctuation orthography hyphenation variants
edited May 13 '17 at 22:23
Sven Yargs
114k20248506
114k20248506
asked Nov 18 '16 at 11:31
johnsgpjohnsgp
23116
23116
I think the etymology of this word is rather obvious: started off as two words, fund raising, and then, over time, people used it enough that it became one word, fundraising. As with almost all hyphenation-versus-one-word questions, it is completely optional whether you hyphenate or not.
– BladorthinTheGrey
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
1
@BladorthinTheGrey I don't think it is correct to call English or any other language "obvious". Even the very strict formal languages used in computer programming have to be documented with detailed grammars to ensure they are correctly implemented. For example, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford dictionaries spell "ice cream" as two words despite its huge popularity. And as Sven Yargs has shown, these choices can change over time.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:30
add a comment |
I think the etymology of this word is rather obvious: started off as two words, fund raising, and then, over time, people used it enough that it became one word, fundraising. As with almost all hyphenation-versus-one-word questions, it is completely optional whether you hyphenate or not.
– BladorthinTheGrey
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
1
@BladorthinTheGrey I don't think it is correct to call English or any other language "obvious". Even the very strict formal languages used in computer programming have to be documented with detailed grammars to ensure they are correctly implemented. For example, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford dictionaries spell "ice cream" as two words despite its huge popularity. And as Sven Yargs has shown, these choices can change over time.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:30
I think the etymology of this word is rather obvious: started off as two words, fund raising, and then, over time, people used it enough that it became one word, fundraising. As with almost all hyphenation-versus-one-word questions, it is completely optional whether you hyphenate or not.
– BladorthinTheGrey
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
I think the etymology of this word is rather obvious: started off as two words, fund raising, and then, over time, people used it enough that it became one word, fundraising. As with almost all hyphenation-versus-one-word questions, it is completely optional whether you hyphenate or not.
– BladorthinTheGrey
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
1
1
@BladorthinTheGrey I don't think it is correct to call English or any other language "obvious". Even the very strict formal languages used in computer programming have to be documented with detailed grammars to ensure they are correctly implemented. For example, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford dictionaries spell "ice cream" as two words despite its huge popularity. And as Sven Yargs has shown, these choices can change over time.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:30
@BladorthinTheGrey I don't think it is correct to call English or any other language "obvious". Even the very strict formal languages used in computer programming have to be documented with detailed grammars to ensure they are correctly implemented. For example, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford dictionaries spell "ice cream" as two words despite its huge popularity. And as Sven Yargs has shown, these choices can change over time.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:30
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Google Books' Ngram Viewer has some severe limitations in its ability to track hyphenated words—but in the case of fund raising vs. fund-raising vs. fundraising, Ngram's bad behavior actually helps underscore the dominance of the spelling fundraising in current usage.
Because the Ngram algorithm treats instances of fund-raising as though the word were spelled as two separate word with no hyphen (fund raising), an Ngram chart that tracks fund raising (blue line) versus fundraising (red line) is actually tracking the relative frequency of fund raising and fund-raising against that of fundraising. Here is the Ngram chart for the period 1930–2008:
The chart indicates that from the late 1930s (when the terms began to be used with some degree of frequency) until the mid-1980s, the popularity of fund raising and fund-raising (considered together) exceeded the popularity of fundraising (considered by itself); but from the early 1990s through the end of the chart (2008), fundraising has been considerably more popular than the other two combined.
The treatment of the term in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary series is far more conservative than I would have expected, given the Ngram data. Through the Eighth Collegiate (1973), there is no entry for the term—not because the term didn't exist, but because the dictionary viewed it as consisting of two separate words (fund and raising) that did not possess any special, otherwise uninferable meaning as a compound expression.
The Ninth Collegiate (1983) breaks with its predecessors by including an entry for fund-raising (with a hyphen) as a noun and dating the word to 1940. That is not surprising. But the Tenth Collegiate (1993), the Eleventh Collegiate (2003), and even the current online Merriam-Webster persist in spelling fund-raising as a hyphenated word. It seems quite clear to me that actual usage has left MW behind.
Far more in tune with the times is The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, which went from having no entry for the term in its 1980 edition to including a listing for fundraising or fund-raising in its third edition (1992) to dropping the hyphenated form altogether in its fifth edition (2011).
Publishers that base their spelling decisions on guidance from Merriam-Webster will either insist on the spelling fund-raising or will include fundraising in its in-house style guide as an explicit overruling of MW's spelling preference. Publishers that follow AHDEL (a number that is growing as American Heritage continues to publish new editions of its print dictionary every ten years or so, while Merriam-Webster hasn't published a new print dictionary since 2003) will use fundraising.
If you aren't required to follow an established house style, you're free to choose the spelling/ punctuation style you prefer, but it seems clear that fundraising is rapidly eclipsing its rivals in the publishing world at large.
Thanks for pointing me to Ngram Viewer - it's a brilliant resource! Your answer is exactly what I was looking for.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:31
add a comment |
I live in Canada and we follow the British style of spelling. My Oxford dictionary has this listed as 'fund-raising'.
add a comment |
fundraising
fun
draising
It's hyphenated: f
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
It is one single word. Fundraising.
Fundraise
/'fŭnd,rāz/
verb
1. raise money for a cause or project
syn: fund-raise, fund raise
1
Thanks for reply but it has not answered my question. The definition shows all three spellings and doesn't say anything about which is the current practice. Do you have any references that indicate why fundraising is the current practice? A dictionary definition won't always show what's actually used in practice.
– johnsgp
Nov 20 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f359005%2fis-the-spelling-fundraising-fund-raising-or-fund-raising%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Google Books' Ngram Viewer has some severe limitations in its ability to track hyphenated words—but in the case of fund raising vs. fund-raising vs. fundraising, Ngram's bad behavior actually helps underscore the dominance of the spelling fundraising in current usage.
Because the Ngram algorithm treats instances of fund-raising as though the word were spelled as two separate word with no hyphen (fund raising), an Ngram chart that tracks fund raising (blue line) versus fundraising (red line) is actually tracking the relative frequency of fund raising and fund-raising against that of fundraising. Here is the Ngram chart for the period 1930–2008:
The chart indicates that from the late 1930s (when the terms began to be used with some degree of frequency) until the mid-1980s, the popularity of fund raising and fund-raising (considered together) exceeded the popularity of fundraising (considered by itself); but from the early 1990s through the end of the chart (2008), fundraising has been considerably more popular than the other two combined.
The treatment of the term in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary series is far more conservative than I would have expected, given the Ngram data. Through the Eighth Collegiate (1973), there is no entry for the term—not because the term didn't exist, but because the dictionary viewed it as consisting of two separate words (fund and raising) that did not possess any special, otherwise uninferable meaning as a compound expression.
The Ninth Collegiate (1983) breaks with its predecessors by including an entry for fund-raising (with a hyphen) as a noun and dating the word to 1940. That is not surprising. But the Tenth Collegiate (1993), the Eleventh Collegiate (2003), and even the current online Merriam-Webster persist in spelling fund-raising as a hyphenated word. It seems quite clear to me that actual usage has left MW behind.
Far more in tune with the times is The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, which went from having no entry for the term in its 1980 edition to including a listing for fundraising or fund-raising in its third edition (1992) to dropping the hyphenated form altogether in its fifth edition (2011).
Publishers that base their spelling decisions on guidance from Merriam-Webster will either insist on the spelling fund-raising or will include fundraising in its in-house style guide as an explicit overruling of MW's spelling preference. Publishers that follow AHDEL (a number that is growing as American Heritage continues to publish new editions of its print dictionary every ten years or so, while Merriam-Webster hasn't published a new print dictionary since 2003) will use fundraising.
If you aren't required to follow an established house style, you're free to choose the spelling/ punctuation style you prefer, but it seems clear that fundraising is rapidly eclipsing its rivals in the publishing world at large.
Thanks for pointing me to Ngram Viewer - it's a brilliant resource! Your answer is exactly what I was looking for.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:31
add a comment |
Google Books' Ngram Viewer has some severe limitations in its ability to track hyphenated words—but in the case of fund raising vs. fund-raising vs. fundraising, Ngram's bad behavior actually helps underscore the dominance of the spelling fundraising in current usage.
Because the Ngram algorithm treats instances of fund-raising as though the word were spelled as two separate word with no hyphen (fund raising), an Ngram chart that tracks fund raising (blue line) versus fundraising (red line) is actually tracking the relative frequency of fund raising and fund-raising against that of fundraising. Here is the Ngram chart for the period 1930–2008:
The chart indicates that from the late 1930s (when the terms began to be used with some degree of frequency) until the mid-1980s, the popularity of fund raising and fund-raising (considered together) exceeded the popularity of fundraising (considered by itself); but from the early 1990s through the end of the chart (2008), fundraising has been considerably more popular than the other two combined.
The treatment of the term in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary series is far more conservative than I would have expected, given the Ngram data. Through the Eighth Collegiate (1973), there is no entry for the term—not because the term didn't exist, but because the dictionary viewed it as consisting of two separate words (fund and raising) that did not possess any special, otherwise uninferable meaning as a compound expression.
The Ninth Collegiate (1983) breaks with its predecessors by including an entry for fund-raising (with a hyphen) as a noun and dating the word to 1940. That is not surprising. But the Tenth Collegiate (1993), the Eleventh Collegiate (2003), and even the current online Merriam-Webster persist in spelling fund-raising as a hyphenated word. It seems quite clear to me that actual usage has left MW behind.
Far more in tune with the times is The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, which went from having no entry for the term in its 1980 edition to including a listing for fundraising or fund-raising in its third edition (1992) to dropping the hyphenated form altogether in its fifth edition (2011).
Publishers that base their spelling decisions on guidance from Merriam-Webster will either insist on the spelling fund-raising or will include fundraising in its in-house style guide as an explicit overruling of MW's spelling preference. Publishers that follow AHDEL (a number that is growing as American Heritage continues to publish new editions of its print dictionary every ten years or so, while Merriam-Webster hasn't published a new print dictionary since 2003) will use fundraising.
If you aren't required to follow an established house style, you're free to choose the spelling/ punctuation style you prefer, but it seems clear that fundraising is rapidly eclipsing its rivals in the publishing world at large.
Thanks for pointing me to Ngram Viewer - it's a brilliant resource! Your answer is exactly what I was looking for.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:31
add a comment |
Google Books' Ngram Viewer has some severe limitations in its ability to track hyphenated words—but in the case of fund raising vs. fund-raising vs. fundraising, Ngram's bad behavior actually helps underscore the dominance of the spelling fundraising in current usage.
Because the Ngram algorithm treats instances of fund-raising as though the word were spelled as two separate word with no hyphen (fund raising), an Ngram chart that tracks fund raising (blue line) versus fundraising (red line) is actually tracking the relative frequency of fund raising and fund-raising against that of fundraising. Here is the Ngram chart for the period 1930–2008:
The chart indicates that from the late 1930s (when the terms began to be used with some degree of frequency) until the mid-1980s, the popularity of fund raising and fund-raising (considered together) exceeded the popularity of fundraising (considered by itself); but from the early 1990s through the end of the chart (2008), fundraising has been considerably more popular than the other two combined.
The treatment of the term in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary series is far more conservative than I would have expected, given the Ngram data. Through the Eighth Collegiate (1973), there is no entry for the term—not because the term didn't exist, but because the dictionary viewed it as consisting of two separate words (fund and raising) that did not possess any special, otherwise uninferable meaning as a compound expression.
The Ninth Collegiate (1983) breaks with its predecessors by including an entry for fund-raising (with a hyphen) as a noun and dating the word to 1940. That is not surprising. But the Tenth Collegiate (1993), the Eleventh Collegiate (2003), and even the current online Merriam-Webster persist in spelling fund-raising as a hyphenated word. It seems quite clear to me that actual usage has left MW behind.
Far more in tune with the times is The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, which went from having no entry for the term in its 1980 edition to including a listing for fundraising or fund-raising in its third edition (1992) to dropping the hyphenated form altogether in its fifth edition (2011).
Publishers that base their spelling decisions on guidance from Merriam-Webster will either insist on the spelling fund-raising or will include fundraising in its in-house style guide as an explicit overruling of MW's spelling preference. Publishers that follow AHDEL (a number that is growing as American Heritage continues to publish new editions of its print dictionary every ten years or so, while Merriam-Webster hasn't published a new print dictionary since 2003) will use fundraising.
If you aren't required to follow an established house style, you're free to choose the spelling/ punctuation style you prefer, but it seems clear that fundraising is rapidly eclipsing its rivals in the publishing world at large.
Google Books' Ngram Viewer has some severe limitations in its ability to track hyphenated words—but in the case of fund raising vs. fund-raising vs. fundraising, Ngram's bad behavior actually helps underscore the dominance of the spelling fundraising in current usage.
Because the Ngram algorithm treats instances of fund-raising as though the word were spelled as two separate word with no hyphen (fund raising), an Ngram chart that tracks fund raising (blue line) versus fundraising (red line) is actually tracking the relative frequency of fund raising and fund-raising against that of fundraising. Here is the Ngram chart for the period 1930–2008:
The chart indicates that from the late 1930s (when the terms began to be used with some degree of frequency) until the mid-1980s, the popularity of fund raising and fund-raising (considered together) exceeded the popularity of fundraising (considered by itself); but from the early 1990s through the end of the chart (2008), fundraising has been considerably more popular than the other two combined.
The treatment of the term in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary series is far more conservative than I would have expected, given the Ngram data. Through the Eighth Collegiate (1973), there is no entry for the term—not because the term didn't exist, but because the dictionary viewed it as consisting of two separate words (fund and raising) that did not possess any special, otherwise uninferable meaning as a compound expression.
The Ninth Collegiate (1983) breaks with its predecessors by including an entry for fund-raising (with a hyphen) as a noun and dating the word to 1940. That is not surprising. But the Tenth Collegiate (1993), the Eleventh Collegiate (2003), and even the current online Merriam-Webster persist in spelling fund-raising as a hyphenated word. It seems quite clear to me that actual usage has left MW behind.
Far more in tune with the times is The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, which went from having no entry for the term in its 1980 edition to including a listing for fundraising or fund-raising in its third edition (1992) to dropping the hyphenated form altogether in its fifth edition (2011).
Publishers that base their spelling decisions on guidance from Merriam-Webster will either insist on the spelling fund-raising or will include fundraising in its in-house style guide as an explicit overruling of MW's spelling preference. Publishers that follow AHDEL (a number that is growing as American Heritage continues to publish new editions of its print dictionary every ten years or so, while Merriam-Webster hasn't published a new print dictionary since 2003) will use fundraising.
If you aren't required to follow an established house style, you're free to choose the spelling/ punctuation style you prefer, but it seems clear that fundraising is rapidly eclipsing its rivals in the publishing world at large.
edited May 13 '17 at 22:17
answered Nov 22 '16 at 7:15
Sven YargsSven Yargs
114k20248506
114k20248506
Thanks for pointing me to Ngram Viewer - it's a brilliant resource! Your answer is exactly what I was looking for.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:31
add a comment |
Thanks for pointing me to Ngram Viewer - it's a brilliant resource! Your answer is exactly what I was looking for.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:31
Thanks for pointing me to Ngram Viewer - it's a brilliant resource! Your answer is exactly what I was looking for.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:31
Thanks for pointing me to Ngram Viewer - it's a brilliant resource! Your answer is exactly what I was looking for.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:31
add a comment |
I live in Canada and we follow the British style of spelling. My Oxford dictionary has this listed as 'fund-raising'.
add a comment |
I live in Canada and we follow the British style of spelling. My Oxford dictionary has this listed as 'fund-raising'.
add a comment |
I live in Canada and we follow the British style of spelling. My Oxford dictionary has this listed as 'fund-raising'.
I live in Canada and we follow the British style of spelling. My Oxford dictionary has this listed as 'fund-raising'.
answered Jun 20 '17 at 4:04
Doug GRANTDoug GRANT
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
fundraising
fun
draising
It's hyphenated: f
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
fundraising
fun
draising
It's hyphenated: f
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
fundraising
fun
draising
It's hyphenated: f
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
fundraising
fun
draising
It's hyphenated: f
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 15 mins ago
Jim PiverJim Piver
1
1
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jim Piver is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
It is one single word. Fundraising.
Fundraise
/'fŭnd,rāz/
verb
1. raise money for a cause or project
syn: fund-raise, fund raise
1
Thanks for reply but it has not answered my question. The definition shows all three spellings and doesn't say anything about which is the current practice. Do you have any references that indicate why fundraising is the current practice? A dictionary definition won't always show what's actually used in practice.
– johnsgp
Nov 20 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
It is one single word. Fundraising.
Fundraise
/'fŭnd,rāz/
verb
1. raise money for a cause or project
syn: fund-raise, fund raise
1
Thanks for reply but it has not answered my question. The definition shows all three spellings and doesn't say anything about which is the current practice. Do you have any references that indicate why fundraising is the current practice? A dictionary definition won't always show what's actually used in practice.
– johnsgp
Nov 20 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
It is one single word. Fundraising.
Fundraise
/'fŭnd,rāz/
verb
1. raise money for a cause or project
syn: fund-raise, fund raise
It is one single word. Fundraising.
Fundraise
/'fŭnd,rāz/
verb
1. raise money for a cause or project
syn: fund-raise, fund raise
edited Nov 18 '16 at 16:44


BladorthinTheGrey
6,13422557
6,13422557
answered Nov 18 '16 at 11:49
iMerchantiMerchant
26618
26618
1
Thanks for reply but it has not answered my question. The definition shows all three spellings and doesn't say anything about which is the current practice. Do you have any references that indicate why fundraising is the current practice? A dictionary definition won't always show what's actually used in practice.
– johnsgp
Nov 20 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
1
Thanks for reply but it has not answered my question. The definition shows all three spellings and doesn't say anything about which is the current practice. Do you have any references that indicate why fundraising is the current practice? A dictionary definition won't always show what's actually used in practice.
– johnsgp
Nov 20 '16 at 13:32
1
1
Thanks for reply but it has not answered my question. The definition shows all three spellings and doesn't say anything about which is the current practice. Do you have any references that indicate why fundraising is the current practice? A dictionary definition won't always show what's actually used in practice.
– johnsgp
Nov 20 '16 at 13:32
Thanks for reply but it has not answered my question. The definition shows all three spellings and doesn't say anything about which is the current practice. Do you have any references that indicate why fundraising is the current practice? A dictionary definition won't always show what's actually used in practice.
– johnsgp
Nov 20 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f359005%2fis-the-spelling-fundraising-fund-raising-or-fund-raising%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
M 4FqJOVjmbbwNv7nEGNHCUBzEw7BWKyTri5io7TRpYtV SHNYo02uevihULHmEkX1WW4
I think the etymology of this word is rather obvious: started off as two words, fund raising, and then, over time, people used it enough that it became one word, fundraising. As with almost all hyphenation-versus-one-word questions, it is completely optional whether you hyphenate or not.
– BladorthinTheGrey
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
1
@BladorthinTheGrey I don't think it is correct to call English or any other language "obvious". Even the very strict formal languages used in computer programming have to be documented with detailed grammars to ensure they are correctly implemented. For example, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford dictionaries spell "ice cream" as two words despite its huge popularity. And as Sven Yargs has shown, these choices can change over time.
– johnsgp
Nov 22 '16 at 10:30