Is there such a thing in math the inverse of a sequence?
$begingroup$
Such as can I construct a sequence by reversing the order of the approximating sequence of $frac{1}{3}$? So such inverse would look like $left{….,0.333333333,0.3333333,0.333333,...0.3right}$.
I had this question when I was constructing a sequence that is bounded between 0 and 1/2 and not convergent to 0 for a homework question.
real-analysis sequences-and-series inverse
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Such as can I construct a sequence by reversing the order of the approximating sequence of $frac{1}{3}$? So such inverse would look like $left{….,0.333333333,0.3333333,0.333333,...0.3right}$.
I had this question when I was constructing a sequence that is bounded between 0 and 1/2 and not convergent to 0 for a homework question.
real-analysis sequences-and-series inverse
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can't, imagine if the first element has $n$ three's but in the original sequence the element with $n+1$ three's come after the one with $n$ three's hence in the new sequence it should be before the first element, a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– kingW3
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
And no, there is a difference between stupid and bad questions, in your case the votes have matchedvso your question divides opinion. Giving enough context helps when you are asking a "stupid" question, i.e. mentioning that you heard it in class or in conversation with a friend or online on some webpage helps. Also mention what was the broad topic if the conversation, so that others will be able to address concerns relating to that in the answer as well.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is a good question. In several cases, a sequence makes sense for negative values of the index. For example, the Fibonacci numbers ${0,1,1,2,3,5,dots}$ can be exteneded to negative indices as ${dots,5,-3,2,-1,1}$. I encounter this kind of thing in the OEIS many time.
$endgroup$
– Somos
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Such as can I construct a sequence by reversing the order of the approximating sequence of $frac{1}{3}$? So such inverse would look like $left{….,0.333333333,0.3333333,0.333333,...0.3right}$.
I had this question when I was constructing a sequence that is bounded between 0 and 1/2 and not convergent to 0 for a homework question.
real-analysis sequences-and-series inverse
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
$endgroup$
Such as can I construct a sequence by reversing the order of the approximating sequence of $frac{1}{3}$? So such inverse would look like $left{….,0.333333333,0.3333333,0.333333,...0.3right}$.
I had this question when I was constructing a sequence that is bounded between 0 and 1/2 and not convergent to 0 for a homework question.
real-analysis sequences-and-series inverse
real-analysis sequences-and-series inverse
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
edited 3 mins ago
user917099
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
asked 4 hours ago
user917099user917099
1495
1495
$begingroup$
You can't, imagine if the first element has $n$ three's but in the original sequence the element with $n+1$ three's come after the one with $n$ three's hence in the new sequence it should be before the first element, a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– kingW3
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
And no, there is a difference between stupid and bad questions, in your case the votes have matchedvso your question divides opinion. Giving enough context helps when you are asking a "stupid" question, i.e. mentioning that you heard it in class or in conversation with a friend or online on some webpage helps. Also mention what was the broad topic if the conversation, so that others will be able to address concerns relating to that in the answer as well.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is a good question. In several cases, a sequence makes sense for negative values of the index. For example, the Fibonacci numbers ${0,1,1,2,3,5,dots}$ can be exteneded to negative indices as ${dots,5,-3,2,-1,1}$. I encounter this kind of thing in the OEIS many time.
$endgroup$
– Somos
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can't, imagine if the first element has $n$ three's but in the original sequence the element with $n+1$ three's come after the one with $n$ three's hence in the new sequence it should be before the first element, a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– kingW3
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
And no, there is a difference between stupid and bad questions, in your case the votes have matchedvso your question divides opinion. Giving enough context helps when you are asking a "stupid" question, i.e. mentioning that you heard it in class or in conversation with a friend or online on some webpage helps. Also mention what was the broad topic if the conversation, so that others will be able to address concerns relating to that in the answer as well.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is a good question. In several cases, a sequence makes sense for negative values of the index. For example, the Fibonacci numbers ${0,1,1,2,3,5,dots}$ can be exteneded to negative indices as ${dots,5,-3,2,-1,1}$. I encounter this kind of thing in the OEIS many time.
$endgroup$
– Somos
5 mins ago
$begingroup$
You can't, imagine if the first element has $n$ three's but in the original sequence the element with $n+1$ three's come after the one with $n$ three's hence in the new sequence it should be before the first element, a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– kingW3
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
You can't, imagine if the first element has $n$ three's but in the original sequence the element with $n+1$ three's come after the one with $n$ three's hence in the new sequence it should be before the first element, a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– kingW3
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
And no, there is a difference between stupid and bad questions, in your case the votes have matchedvso your question divides opinion. Giving enough context helps when you are asking a "stupid" question, i.e. mentioning that you heard it in class or in conversation with a friend or online on some webpage helps. Also mention what was the broad topic if the conversation, so that others will be able to address concerns relating to that in the answer as well.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And no, there is a difference between stupid and bad questions, in your case the votes have matchedvso your question divides opinion. Giving enough context helps when you are asking a "stupid" question, i.e. mentioning that you heard it in class or in conversation with a friend or online on some webpage helps. Also mention what was the broad topic if the conversation, so that others will be able to address concerns relating to that in the answer as well.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is a good question. In several cases, a sequence makes sense for negative values of the index. For example, the Fibonacci numbers ${0,1,1,2,3,5,dots}$ can be exteneded to negative indices as ${dots,5,-3,2,-1,1}$. I encounter this kind of thing in the OEIS many time.
$endgroup$
– Somos
5 mins ago
$begingroup$
This is a good question. In several cases, a sequence makes sense for negative values of the index. For example, the Fibonacci numbers ${0,1,1,2,3,5,dots}$ can be exteneded to negative indices as ${dots,5,-3,2,-1,1}$. I encounter this kind of thing in the OEIS many time.
$endgroup$
– Somos
5 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A sequence is ultimately a map whose domain is $mathbb N$, but the object that you describe (a) has no first term, and (b) terminates.
If you want, I suppose you could define an object whose indices run from $-infty$ to $0$, but that's not appreciably different from looking at the original sequence while standing on your head.
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139613%2fis-there-such-a-thing-in-math-the-inverse-of-a-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A sequence is ultimately a map whose domain is $mathbb N$, but the object that you describe (a) has no first term, and (b) terminates.
If you want, I suppose you could define an object whose indices run from $-infty$ to $0$, but that's not appreciably different from looking at the original sequence while standing on your head.
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A sequence is ultimately a map whose domain is $mathbb N$, but the object that you describe (a) has no first term, and (b) terminates.
If you want, I suppose you could define an object whose indices run from $-infty$ to $0$, but that's not appreciably different from looking at the original sequence while standing on your head.
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A sequence is ultimately a map whose domain is $mathbb N$, but the object that you describe (a) has no first term, and (b) terminates.
If you want, I suppose you could define an object whose indices run from $-infty$ to $0$, but that's not appreciably different from looking at the original sequence while standing on your head.
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
$endgroup$
A sequence is ultimately a map whose domain is $mathbb N$, but the object that you describe (a) has no first term, and (b) terminates.
If you want, I suppose you could define an object whose indices run from $-infty$ to $0$, but that's not appreciably different from looking at the original sequence while standing on your head.
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
edited 2 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
answered 4 hours ago
J. MurrayJ. Murray
53017
53017
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139613%2fis-there-such-a-thing-in-math-the-inverse-of-a-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You can't, imagine if the first element has $n$ three's but in the original sequence the element with $n+1$ three's come after the one with $n$ three's hence in the new sequence it should be before the first element, a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– kingW3
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
And no, there is a difference between stupid and bad questions, in your case the votes have matchedvso your question divides opinion. Giving enough context helps when you are asking a "stupid" question, i.e. mentioning that you heard it in class or in conversation with a friend or online on some webpage helps. Also mention what was the broad topic if the conversation, so that others will be able to address concerns relating to that in the answer as well.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is a good question. In several cases, a sequence makes sense for negative values of the index. For example, the Fibonacci numbers ${0,1,1,2,3,5,dots}$ can be exteneded to negative indices as ${dots,5,-3,2,-1,1}$. I encounter this kind of thing in the OEIS many time.
$endgroup$
– Somos
5 mins ago