Why is the plural of “quiz” spelled with double Z?

Multi tool use
The plural of "quiz" is spelled with double "z" while the plural of "box" (and sometimes "bus") is spelled with a single last consonant. Why is it so? Is this the general rule to double the last consonant to keep the syllable closed?
nouns grammatical-number orthography double-consonant
add a comment |
The plural of "quiz" is spelled with double "z" while the plural of "box" (and sometimes "bus") is spelled with a single last consonant. Why is it so? Is this the general rule to double the last consonant to keep the syllable closed?
nouns grammatical-number orthography double-consonant
Busses is a valid plural of bus. Merriam-Webster, Wiktionary, The Free Dictionary.
– RegDwigнt♦
May 9 '12 at 8:23
1
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8, all of the dictionaries you have mentioned also list "buses" as a valid plural of "bus". Citing Merriam-Webster "plural bus·es also bus·ses", this makes me think that "buses" is more common.
– Larisa Lyapina
May 9 '12 at 9:24
@LarisaLyapina - Buss is an old word for "kiss"; it may be that the single-S variant gained popularity out of a desire to avoid confusion. Maybe.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 9:40
2
@LarisaLyapina,MT_Head: Per this earlier question, the vehicles are normally pluralised as buses, and the electronics data/power connections as busses.
– FumbleFingers
May 9 '12 at 14:42
The more common plural form of fez is fezzes, according Merriam-Webster, although it accepts fezes as a variant.
– Sven Yargs
Oct 20 '18 at 4:13
add a comment |
The plural of "quiz" is spelled with double "z" while the plural of "box" (and sometimes "bus") is spelled with a single last consonant. Why is it so? Is this the general rule to double the last consonant to keep the syllable closed?
nouns grammatical-number orthography double-consonant
The plural of "quiz" is spelled with double "z" while the plural of "box" (and sometimes "bus") is spelled with a single last consonant. Why is it so? Is this the general rule to double the last consonant to keep the syllable closed?
nouns grammatical-number orthography double-consonant
nouns grammatical-number orthography double-consonant
edited Oct 20 '18 at 0:01


sumelic
47.5k8113216
47.5k8113216
asked May 9 '12 at 7:52
Larisa LyapinaLarisa Lyapina
41114
41114
Busses is a valid plural of bus. Merriam-Webster, Wiktionary, The Free Dictionary.
– RegDwigнt♦
May 9 '12 at 8:23
1
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8, all of the dictionaries you have mentioned also list "buses" as a valid plural of "bus". Citing Merriam-Webster "plural bus·es also bus·ses", this makes me think that "buses" is more common.
– Larisa Lyapina
May 9 '12 at 9:24
@LarisaLyapina - Buss is an old word for "kiss"; it may be that the single-S variant gained popularity out of a desire to avoid confusion. Maybe.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 9:40
2
@LarisaLyapina,MT_Head: Per this earlier question, the vehicles are normally pluralised as buses, and the electronics data/power connections as busses.
– FumbleFingers
May 9 '12 at 14:42
The more common plural form of fez is fezzes, according Merriam-Webster, although it accepts fezes as a variant.
– Sven Yargs
Oct 20 '18 at 4:13
add a comment |
Busses is a valid plural of bus. Merriam-Webster, Wiktionary, The Free Dictionary.
– RegDwigнt♦
May 9 '12 at 8:23
1
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8, all of the dictionaries you have mentioned also list "buses" as a valid plural of "bus". Citing Merriam-Webster "plural bus·es also bus·ses", this makes me think that "buses" is more common.
– Larisa Lyapina
May 9 '12 at 9:24
@LarisaLyapina - Buss is an old word for "kiss"; it may be that the single-S variant gained popularity out of a desire to avoid confusion. Maybe.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 9:40
2
@LarisaLyapina,MT_Head: Per this earlier question, the vehicles are normally pluralised as buses, and the electronics data/power connections as busses.
– FumbleFingers
May 9 '12 at 14:42
The more common plural form of fez is fezzes, according Merriam-Webster, although it accepts fezes as a variant.
– Sven Yargs
Oct 20 '18 at 4:13
Busses is a valid plural of bus. Merriam-Webster, Wiktionary, The Free Dictionary.
– RegDwigнt♦
May 9 '12 at 8:23
Busses is a valid plural of bus. Merriam-Webster, Wiktionary, The Free Dictionary.
– RegDwigнt♦
May 9 '12 at 8:23
1
1
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8, all of the dictionaries you have mentioned also list "buses" as a valid plural of "bus". Citing Merriam-Webster "plural bus·es also bus·ses", this makes me think that "buses" is more common.
– Larisa Lyapina
May 9 '12 at 9:24
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8, all of the dictionaries you have mentioned also list "buses" as a valid plural of "bus". Citing Merriam-Webster "plural bus·es also bus·ses", this makes me think that "buses" is more common.
– Larisa Lyapina
May 9 '12 at 9:24
@LarisaLyapina - Buss is an old word for "kiss"; it may be that the single-S variant gained popularity out of a desire to avoid confusion. Maybe.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 9:40
@LarisaLyapina - Buss is an old word for "kiss"; it may be that the single-S variant gained popularity out of a desire to avoid confusion. Maybe.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 9:40
2
2
@LarisaLyapina,MT_Head: Per this earlier question, the vehicles are normally pluralised as buses, and the electronics data/power connections as busses.
– FumbleFingers
May 9 '12 at 14:42
@LarisaLyapina,MT_Head: Per this earlier question, the vehicles are normally pluralised as buses, and the electronics data/power connections as busses.
– FumbleFingers
May 9 '12 at 14:42
The more common plural form of fez is fezzes, according Merriam-Webster, although it accepts fezes as a variant.
– Sven Yargs
Oct 20 '18 at 4:13
The more common plural form of fez is fezzes, according Merriam-Webster, although it accepts fezes as a variant.
– Sven Yargs
Oct 20 '18 at 4:13
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
In most cases where a word ends in (vowel)-(consonant)-e, we pronounce the last syllable with a long vowel sound. Conversely, most words that end with a double consonant get a short vowel sound.
So: when adding "es", "er", "est", or "ed" to the end of the word would appear to change the vowel sound, double the consonant.
Examples:
quizes - ize is usually pronounced like "eyes", so change it to quizzes to preserve the short I sound
subed (short for "substituted") - ube is usually pronounced "oob" or "yoob", so change it to subbed
biger - ige is usually pronounced "eyej", so change to bigger
Related: Tom Lehrer's song Silent E from The Electric Company TV show (one of my childhood faves!)
I find this answer a bit unsatisfactory. The rules for doubling the consonants before -ed, -ing, and -er/-est are pretty much clear and follow the logic of your answer. However, the plural -es seems to be different. Why is it buses, but not busses? If bus were an adjective or verb, we'd have bussed, bussing, or busser, and the bussest... But somehow it's buses.
– Armen Ծիրունյան
May 9 '12 at 11:03
2
Wouldn't you think that if "quizes" should rhyme with "eyes", then "buses" should rhyme with "fuses"?
– Malvolio
May 9 '12 at 14:54
2
@ArmenTsirunyan - Bus is a relatively new word, dating from 1825 or so - it's short for omnibus - which means that all of those forms you mention are even newer. As I said in a comment to the OP, buss (meaning "kiss") was already a word in (declining) use at the time. I suspect that buses, busing, bused, etc. were all coined that way to avoid collision with the existing words. Over time, as "buss" dropped even further from common use (I've only ever seen it used in Heinlein novels), I suspect that the reason for the distinction has been largely forgotten.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 16:11
1
When I was growing up (1942-60, say), busses was the accepted plural spelling for bus. Later, when the derived noun bussing was introduced in a context of undoing school segregation, it quickly got shortened to single-S busing by headline writers, and soon enough by everybody else. A letter saved is a letter earned, or something. The fact that jokes about "busing" and "abusing" were easier to make with this spelling is undoubtedly accidental.
– John Lawler
May 9 '12 at 16:21
1
@Malvolio - I do think that, by all logic and consistency, "busses" should be the dominant spelling (by the way, my spell checker doesn't like it!), and for exactly the reason you cite: because buses looks like it ought to rhyme with fuses, and that's a situation we normally avoid. However, it's obviously a special case, and I've put forward one suggestion as to why that is; John Lawler has another which makes a lot of sense to me as well. I think the OP was asking for a general rule - but we all know that there are always exceptions. They don't invalidate the rules, though.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 18:40
|
show 4 more comments
When there are two vowels before a consonant, you do not double the consonant; however, qu has its own sound, so the u is not "counted" as a vowel.
add a comment |
The absence of consonant doubling in "boxes" is regular
The letter X represents two consonant sounds (in this context, /ks/) and counts as two consonants in the context of the rules for pronouncing vowel letters as "long" or "short". Double X is very uncommon and not part of the typical English spelling system (see the answers to Why do we write "fixing" instead of "fixxing"?).
You can see the regular pattern -x → -xes in many other words like foxes, mixes, hexes, taxes, sexes, fixes, flexes, sixes, fluxes.
The presence of consonant doubling in "quizzes" might be considered regular (but words spelled like "quiz" are a bit unusual)
There are not very many examples of consonant doubling before -es, for several reasons.
The usual form of this suffix is -s. The form -es only occurs regularly after sibilant sounds: /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/. (It also occurs, but never with doubling, in plural forms ending in -ves that correspond to singular forms ending in -f.)
Consonant doubling is only regular after a stressed syllable, although there are some cases in English spelling of irregular doubling after an unstressed syllable (see "Focussed" or "focused"? Rules for doubling the last consonant when adding -ed).
Many of the sibilant sounds are either rare in word-final position after stressed short vowels, or have spellings that already doubled or that are incompatible with consonant doubling.
For final /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, the "already-doubled" spellings -tch(es), -dge(s), -ss(es), -zz(es) are common. So we write witch(es), edge(s), kiss(es), mess(es), buzz(es), fuzz(es).
For final /ʃ/, the usual spelling <sh> is not doubled in any context. So we write fish(es), wish(es), ash(es), push(es), etc. When final /tʃ/ is not written double after a short vowel sound (such as attach, enrich) it is not doubled before -es either (attaches, enriches).
Words ending in /ʒ/ are extremely rare, words ending in a short stressed vowel followed by /ʒ/ are even rarer, and the most common spelling of word-final /ʒ/ is -ge, which has no corresponding doubled form. ("Corteges" may be an example of a word ending in /ɛʒɨz/).
So the issue of "to double or not to double before -es?" really only comes up with words ending in /s/ or /z/ preceded by a stressed "short vowel sound" and spelled with a single final S or a single final Z. There aren't that many words like this, so I don't know how much sense it makes to speak of a "general rule" for them.
Examples of Z being doubled before -es: quizzes, spazzes, whizzes, wizzes. But fezes and fezzes both seem to have non-negligible usage.
Examples of S being doubled before -es: buses, pluses, yeses, gases, Guses seem to be more common than busses, plusses, yesses, gasses, Gusses; but the latter forms exist. Biasses is listed in some dictionaries (e.g. AHD, Cambridge) but seems to be much less common than biases.
A few sources make the suggestion that the use of -ses vs. -sses might distinguish a noun form from a verb form; e.g. this web page says "A state of matter > GASES; (verb) to poison with gas > GASSES, GASSING, GASSED" and the Grammarist page on "
Gases vs. gasses" says "In modern English, the plural of gas is usually gases, and gasses is the simple-present verb." The Google Ngram Viewer seems to provide a moderate amount of support for this distinction in that it shows a great deal of usage for gases as a noun, but no detectable usage for gases as a verb. The word gasses has a tiny but detectable amount of usage as a noun or as a verb.
If there really is a notable difference between the use of consonant doubling before -es as a noun suffix vs. as a verb suffix, the reason might be that consonant doubling is more frequent in the context of verb inflection (where there are many common examples of consonant doubling before the suffixes -ing and -ed) than in the context of noun pluralization.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67166%2fwhy-is-the-plural-of-quiz-spelled-with-double-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In most cases where a word ends in (vowel)-(consonant)-e, we pronounce the last syllable with a long vowel sound. Conversely, most words that end with a double consonant get a short vowel sound.
So: when adding "es", "er", "est", or "ed" to the end of the word would appear to change the vowel sound, double the consonant.
Examples:
quizes - ize is usually pronounced like "eyes", so change it to quizzes to preserve the short I sound
subed (short for "substituted") - ube is usually pronounced "oob" or "yoob", so change it to subbed
biger - ige is usually pronounced "eyej", so change to bigger
Related: Tom Lehrer's song Silent E from The Electric Company TV show (one of my childhood faves!)
I find this answer a bit unsatisfactory. The rules for doubling the consonants before -ed, -ing, and -er/-est are pretty much clear and follow the logic of your answer. However, the plural -es seems to be different. Why is it buses, but not busses? If bus were an adjective or verb, we'd have bussed, bussing, or busser, and the bussest... But somehow it's buses.
– Armen Ծիրունյան
May 9 '12 at 11:03
2
Wouldn't you think that if "quizes" should rhyme with "eyes", then "buses" should rhyme with "fuses"?
– Malvolio
May 9 '12 at 14:54
2
@ArmenTsirunyan - Bus is a relatively new word, dating from 1825 or so - it's short for omnibus - which means that all of those forms you mention are even newer. As I said in a comment to the OP, buss (meaning "kiss") was already a word in (declining) use at the time. I suspect that buses, busing, bused, etc. were all coined that way to avoid collision with the existing words. Over time, as "buss" dropped even further from common use (I've only ever seen it used in Heinlein novels), I suspect that the reason for the distinction has been largely forgotten.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 16:11
1
When I was growing up (1942-60, say), busses was the accepted plural spelling for bus. Later, when the derived noun bussing was introduced in a context of undoing school segregation, it quickly got shortened to single-S busing by headline writers, and soon enough by everybody else. A letter saved is a letter earned, or something. The fact that jokes about "busing" and "abusing" were easier to make with this spelling is undoubtedly accidental.
– John Lawler
May 9 '12 at 16:21
1
@Malvolio - I do think that, by all logic and consistency, "busses" should be the dominant spelling (by the way, my spell checker doesn't like it!), and for exactly the reason you cite: because buses looks like it ought to rhyme with fuses, and that's a situation we normally avoid. However, it's obviously a special case, and I've put forward one suggestion as to why that is; John Lawler has another which makes a lot of sense to me as well. I think the OP was asking for a general rule - but we all know that there are always exceptions. They don't invalidate the rules, though.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 18:40
|
show 4 more comments
In most cases where a word ends in (vowel)-(consonant)-e, we pronounce the last syllable with a long vowel sound. Conversely, most words that end with a double consonant get a short vowel sound.
So: when adding "es", "er", "est", or "ed" to the end of the word would appear to change the vowel sound, double the consonant.
Examples:
quizes - ize is usually pronounced like "eyes", so change it to quizzes to preserve the short I sound
subed (short for "substituted") - ube is usually pronounced "oob" or "yoob", so change it to subbed
biger - ige is usually pronounced "eyej", so change to bigger
Related: Tom Lehrer's song Silent E from The Electric Company TV show (one of my childhood faves!)
I find this answer a bit unsatisfactory. The rules for doubling the consonants before -ed, -ing, and -er/-est are pretty much clear and follow the logic of your answer. However, the plural -es seems to be different. Why is it buses, but not busses? If bus were an adjective or verb, we'd have bussed, bussing, or busser, and the bussest... But somehow it's buses.
– Armen Ծիրունյան
May 9 '12 at 11:03
2
Wouldn't you think that if "quizes" should rhyme with "eyes", then "buses" should rhyme with "fuses"?
– Malvolio
May 9 '12 at 14:54
2
@ArmenTsirunyan - Bus is a relatively new word, dating from 1825 or so - it's short for omnibus - which means that all of those forms you mention are even newer. As I said in a comment to the OP, buss (meaning "kiss") was already a word in (declining) use at the time. I suspect that buses, busing, bused, etc. were all coined that way to avoid collision with the existing words. Over time, as "buss" dropped even further from common use (I've only ever seen it used in Heinlein novels), I suspect that the reason for the distinction has been largely forgotten.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 16:11
1
When I was growing up (1942-60, say), busses was the accepted plural spelling for bus. Later, when the derived noun bussing was introduced in a context of undoing school segregation, it quickly got shortened to single-S busing by headline writers, and soon enough by everybody else. A letter saved is a letter earned, or something. The fact that jokes about "busing" and "abusing" were easier to make with this spelling is undoubtedly accidental.
– John Lawler
May 9 '12 at 16:21
1
@Malvolio - I do think that, by all logic and consistency, "busses" should be the dominant spelling (by the way, my spell checker doesn't like it!), and for exactly the reason you cite: because buses looks like it ought to rhyme with fuses, and that's a situation we normally avoid. However, it's obviously a special case, and I've put forward one suggestion as to why that is; John Lawler has another which makes a lot of sense to me as well. I think the OP was asking for a general rule - but we all know that there are always exceptions. They don't invalidate the rules, though.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 18:40
|
show 4 more comments
In most cases where a word ends in (vowel)-(consonant)-e, we pronounce the last syllable with a long vowel sound. Conversely, most words that end with a double consonant get a short vowel sound.
So: when adding "es", "er", "est", or "ed" to the end of the word would appear to change the vowel sound, double the consonant.
Examples:
quizes - ize is usually pronounced like "eyes", so change it to quizzes to preserve the short I sound
subed (short for "substituted") - ube is usually pronounced "oob" or "yoob", so change it to subbed
biger - ige is usually pronounced "eyej", so change to bigger
Related: Tom Lehrer's song Silent E from The Electric Company TV show (one of my childhood faves!)
In most cases where a word ends in (vowel)-(consonant)-e, we pronounce the last syllable with a long vowel sound. Conversely, most words that end with a double consonant get a short vowel sound.
So: when adding "es", "er", "est", or "ed" to the end of the word would appear to change the vowel sound, double the consonant.
Examples:
quizes - ize is usually pronounced like "eyes", so change it to quizzes to preserve the short I sound
subed (short for "substituted") - ube is usually pronounced "oob" or "yoob", so change it to subbed
biger - ige is usually pronounced "eyej", so change to bigger
Related: Tom Lehrer's song Silent E from The Electric Company TV show (one of my childhood faves!)
answered May 9 '12 at 9:37
MT_HeadMT_Head
14.4k13655
14.4k13655
I find this answer a bit unsatisfactory. The rules for doubling the consonants before -ed, -ing, and -er/-est are pretty much clear and follow the logic of your answer. However, the plural -es seems to be different. Why is it buses, but not busses? If bus were an adjective or verb, we'd have bussed, bussing, or busser, and the bussest... But somehow it's buses.
– Armen Ծիրունյան
May 9 '12 at 11:03
2
Wouldn't you think that if "quizes" should rhyme with "eyes", then "buses" should rhyme with "fuses"?
– Malvolio
May 9 '12 at 14:54
2
@ArmenTsirunyan - Bus is a relatively new word, dating from 1825 or so - it's short for omnibus - which means that all of those forms you mention are even newer. As I said in a comment to the OP, buss (meaning "kiss") was already a word in (declining) use at the time. I suspect that buses, busing, bused, etc. were all coined that way to avoid collision with the existing words. Over time, as "buss" dropped even further from common use (I've only ever seen it used in Heinlein novels), I suspect that the reason for the distinction has been largely forgotten.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 16:11
1
When I was growing up (1942-60, say), busses was the accepted plural spelling for bus. Later, when the derived noun bussing was introduced in a context of undoing school segregation, it quickly got shortened to single-S busing by headline writers, and soon enough by everybody else. A letter saved is a letter earned, or something. The fact that jokes about "busing" and "abusing" were easier to make with this spelling is undoubtedly accidental.
– John Lawler
May 9 '12 at 16:21
1
@Malvolio - I do think that, by all logic and consistency, "busses" should be the dominant spelling (by the way, my spell checker doesn't like it!), and for exactly the reason you cite: because buses looks like it ought to rhyme with fuses, and that's a situation we normally avoid. However, it's obviously a special case, and I've put forward one suggestion as to why that is; John Lawler has another which makes a lot of sense to me as well. I think the OP was asking for a general rule - but we all know that there are always exceptions. They don't invalidate the rules, though.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 18:40
|
show 4 more comments
I find this answer a bit unsatisfactory. The rules for doubling the consonants before -ed, -ing, and -er/-est are pretty much clear and follow the logic of your answer. However, the plural -es seems to be different. Why is it buses, but not busses? If bus were an adjective or verb, we'd have bussed, bussing, or busser, and the bussest... But somehow it's buses.
– Armen Ծիրունյան
May 9 '12 at 11:03
2
Wouldn't you think that if "quizes" should rhyme with "eyes", then "buses" should rhyme with "fuses"?
– Malvolio
May 9 '12 at 14:54
2
@ArmenTsirunyan - Bus is a relatively new word, dating from 1825 or so - it's short for omnibus - which means that all of those forms you mention are even newer. As I said in a comment to the OP, buss (meaning "kiss") was already a word in (declining) use at the time. I suspect that buses, busing, bused, etc. were all coined that way to avoid collision with the existing words. Over time, as "buss" dropped even further from common use (I've only ever seen it used in Heinlein novels), I suspect that the reason for the distinction has been largely forgotten.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 16:11
1
When I was growing up (1942-60, say), busses was the accepted plural spelling for bus. Later, when the derived noun bussing was introduced in a context of undoing school segregation, it quickly got shortened to single-S busing by headline writers, and soon enough by everybody else. A letter saved is a letter earned, or something. The fact that jokes about "busing" and "abusing" were easier to make with this spelling is undoubtedly accidental.
– John Lawler
May 9 '12 at 16:21
1
@Malvolio - I do think that, by all logic and consistency, "busses" should be the dominant spelling (by the way, my spell checker doesn't like it!), and for exactly the reason you cite: because buses looks like it ought to rhyme with fuses, and that's a situation we normally avoid. However, it's obviously a special case, and I've put forward one suggestion as to why that is; John Lawler has another which makes a lot of sense to me as well. I think the OP was asking for a general rule - but we all know that there are always exceptions. They don't invalidate the rules, though.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 18:40
I find this answer a bit unsatisfactory. The rules for doubling the consonants before -ed, -ing, and -er/-est are pretty much clear and follow the logic of your answer. However, the plural -es seems to be different. Why is it buses, but not busses? If bus were an adjective or verb, we'd have bussed, bussing, or busser, and the bussest... But somehow it's buses.
– Armen Ծիրունյան
May 9 '12 at 11:03
I find this answer a bit unsatisfactory. The rules for doubling the consonants before -ed, -ing, and -er/-est are pretty much clear and follow the logic of your answer. However, the plural -es seems to be different. Why is it buses, but not busses? If bus were an adjective or verb, we'd have bussed, bussing, or busser, and the bussest... But somehow it's buses.
– Armen Ծիրունյան
May 9 '12 at 11:03
2
2
Wouldn't you think that if "quizes" should rhyme with "eyes", then "buses" should rhyme with "fuses"?
– Malvolio
May 9 '12 at 14:54
Wouldn't you think that if "quizes" should rhyme with "eyes", then "buses" should rhyme with "fuses"?
– Malvolio
May 9 '12 at 14:54
2
2
@ArmenTsirunyan - Bus is a relatively new word, dating from 1825 or so - it's short for omnibus - which means that all of those forms you mention are even newer. As I said in a comment to the OP, buss (meaning "kiss") was already a word in (declining) use at the time. I suspect that buses, busing, bused, etc. were all coined that way to avoid collision with the existing words. Over time, as "buss" dropped even further from common use (I've only ever seen it used in Heinlein novels), I suspect that the reason for the distinction has been largely forgotten.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 16:11
@ArmenTsirunyan - Bus is a relatively new word, dating from 1825 or so - it's short for omnibus - which means that all of those forms you mention are even newer. As I said in a comment to the OP, buss (meaning "kiss") was already a word in (declining) use at the time. I suspect that buses, busing, bused, etc. were all coined that way to avoid collision with the existing words. Over time, as "buss" dropped even further from common use (I've only ever seen it used in Heinlein novels), I suspect that the reason for the distinction has been largely forgotten.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 16:11
1
1
When I was growing up (1942-60, say), busses was the accepted plural spelling for bus. Later, when the derived noun bussing was introduced in a context of undoing school segregation, it quickly got shortened to single-S busing by headline writers, and soon enough by everybody else. A letter saved is a letter earned, or something. The fact that jokes about "busing" and "abusing" were easier to make with this spelling is undoubtedly accidental.
– John Lawler
May 9 '12 at 16:21
When I was growing up (1942-60, say), busses was the accepted plural spelling for bus. Later, when the derived noun bussing was introduced in a context of undoing school segregation, it quickly got shortened to single-S busing by headline writers, and soon enough by everybody else. A letter saved is a letter earned, or something. The fact that jokes about "busing" and "abusing" were easier to make with this spelling is undoubtedly accidental.
– John Lawler
May 9 '12 at 16:21
1
1
@Malvolio - I do think that, by all logic and consistency, "busses" should be the dominant spelling (by the way, my spell checker doesn't like it!), and for exactly the reason you cite: because buses looks like it ought to rhyme with fuses, and that's a situation we normally avoid. However, it's obviously a special case, and I've put forward one suggestion as to why that is; John Lawler has another which makes a lot of sense to me as well. I think the OP was asking for a general rule - but we all know that there are always exceptions. They don't invalidate the rules, though.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 18:40
@Malvolio - I do think that, by all logic and consistency, "busses" should be the dominant spelling (by the way, my spell checker doesn't like it!), and for exactly the reason you cite: because buses looks like it ought to rhyme with fuses, and that's a situation we normally avoid. However, it's obviously a special case, and I've put forward one suggestion as to why that is; John Lawler has another which makes a lot of sense to me as well. I think the OP was asking for a general rule - but we all know that there are always exceptions. They don't invalidate the rules, though.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 18:40
|
show 4 more comments
When there are two vowels before a consonant, you do not double the consonant; however, qu has its own sound, so the u is not "counted" as a vowel.
add a comment |
When there are two vowels before a consonant, you do not double the consonant; however, qu has its own sound, so the u is not "counted" as a vowel.
add a comment |
When there are two vowels before a consonant, you do not double the consonant; however, qu has its own sound, so the u is not "counted" as a vowel.
When there are two vowels before a consonant, you do not double the consonant; however, qu has its own sound, so the u is not "counted" as a vowel.
edited Sep 16 '14 at 21:41


Mari-Lou A
62.2k55221458
62.2k55221458
answered Sep 16 '14 at 20:07
user91656user91656
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
The absence of consonant doubling in "boxes" is regular
The letter X represents two consonant sounds (in this context, /ks/) and counts as two consonants in the context of the rules for pronouncing vowel letters as "long" or "short". Double X is very uncommon and not part of the typical English spelling system (see the answers to Why do we write "fixing" instead of "fixxing"?).
You can see the regular pattern -x → -xes in many other words like foxes, mixes, hexes, taxes, sexes, fixes, flexes, sixes, fluxes.
The presence of consonant doubling in "quizzes" might be considered regular (but words spelled like "quiz" are a bit unusual)
There are not very many examples of consonant doubling before -es, for several reasons.
The usual form of this suffix is -s. The form -es only occurs regularly after sibilant sounds: /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/. (It also occurs, but never with doubling, in plural forms ending in -ves that correspond to singular forms ending in -f.)
Consonant doubling is only regular after a stressed syllable, although there are some cases in English spelling of irregular doubling after an unstressed syllable (see "Focussed" or "focused"? Rules for doubling the last consonant when adding -ed).
Many of the sibilant sounds are either rare in word-final position after stressed short vowels, or have spellings that already doubled or that are incompatible with consonant doubling.
For final /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, the "already-doubled" spellings -tch(es), -dge(s), -ss(es), -zz(es) are common. So we write witch(es), edge(s), kiss(es), mess(es), buzz(es), fuzz(es).
For final /ʃ/, the usual spelling <sh> is not doubled in any context. So we write fish(es), wish(es), ash(es), push(es), etc. When final /tʃ/ is not written double after a short vowel sound (such as attach, enrich) it is not doubled before -es either (attaches, enriches).
Words ending in /ʒ/ are extremely rare, words ending in a short stressed vowel followed by /ʒ/ are even rarer, and the most common spelling of word-final /ʒ/ is -ge, which has no corresponding doubled form. ("Corteges" may be an example of a word ending in /ɛʒɨz/).
So the issue of "to double or not to double before -es?" really only comes up with words ending in /s/ or /z/ preceded by a stressed "short vowel sound" and spelled with a single final S or a single final Z. There aren't that many words like this, so I don't know how much sense it makes to speak of a "general rule" for them.
Examples of Z being doubled before -es: quizzes, spazzes, whizzes, wizzes. But fezes and fezzes both seem to have non-negligible usage.
Examples of S being doubled before -es: buses, pluses, yeses, gases, Guses seem to be more common than busses, plusses, yesses, gasses, Gusses; but the latter forms exist. Biasses is listed in some dictionaries (e.g. AHD, Cambridge) but seems to be much less common than biases.
A few sources make the suggestion that the use of -ses vs. -sses might distinguish a noun form from a verb form; e.g. this web page says "A state of matter > GASES; (verb) to poison with gas > GASSES, GASSING, GASSED" and the Grammarist page on "
Gases vs. gasses" says "In modern English, the plural of gas is usually gases, and gasses is the simple-present verb." The Google Ngram Viewer seems to provide a moderate amount of support for this distinction in that it shows a great deal of usage for gases as a noun, but no detectable usage for gases as a verb. The word gasses has a tiny but detectable amount of usage as a noun or as a verb.
If there really is a notable difference between the use of consonant doubling before -es as a noun suffix vs. as a verb suffix, the reason might be that consonant doubling is more frequent in the context of verb inflection (where there are many common examples of consonant doubling before the suffixes -ing and -ed) than in the context of noun pluralization.
add a comment |
The absence of consonant doubling in "boxes" is regular
The letter X represents two consonant sounds (in this context, /ks/) and counts as two consonants in the context of the rules for pronouncing vowel letters as "long" or "short". Double X is very uncommon and not part of the typical English spelling system (see the answers to Why do we write "fixing" instead of "fixxing"?).
You can see the regular pattern -x → -xes in many other words like foxes, mixes, hexes, taxes, sexes, fixes, flexes, sixes, fluxes.
The presence of consonant doubling in "quizzes" might be considered regular (but words spelled like "quiz" are a bit unusual)
There are not very many examples of consonant doubling before -es, for several reasons.
The usual form of this suffix is -s. The form -es only occurs regularly after sibilant sounds: /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/. (It also occurs, but never with doubling, in plural forms ending in -ves that correspond to singular forms ending in -f.)
Consonant doubling is only regular after a stressed syllable, although there are some cases in English spelling of irregular doubling after an unstressed syllable (see "Focussed" or "focused"? Rules for doubling the last consonant when adding -ed).
Many of the sibilant sounds are either rare in word-final position after stressed short vowels, or have spellings that already doubled or that are incompatible with consonant doubling.
For final /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, the "already-doubled" spellings -tch(es), -dge(s), -ss(es), -zz(es) are common. So we write witch(es), edge(s), kiss(es), mess(es), buzz(es), fuzz(es).
For final /ʃ/, the usual spelling <sh> is not doubled in any context. So we write fish(es), wish(es), ash(es), push(es), etc. When final /tʃ/ is not written double after a short vowel sound (such as attach, enrich) it is not doubled before -es either (attaches, enriches).
Words ending in /ʒ/ are extremely rare, words ending in a short stressed vowel followed by /ʒ/ are even rarer, and the most common spelling of word-final /ʒ/ is -ge, which has no corresponding doubled form. ("Corteges" may be an example of a word ending in /ɛʒɨz/).
So the issue of "to double or not to double before -es?" really only comes up with words ending in /s/ or /z/ preceded by a stressed "short vowel sound" and spelled with a single final S or a single final Z. There aren't that many words like this, so I don't know how much sense it makes to speak of a "general rule" for them.
Examples of Z being doubled before -es: quizzes, spazzes, whizzes, wizzes. But fezes and fezzes both seem to have non-negligible usage.
Examples of S being doubled before -es: buses, pluses, yeses, gases, Guses seem to be more common than busses, plusses, yesses, gasses, Gusses; but the latter forms exist. Biasses is listed in some dictionaries (e.g. AHD, Cambridge) but seems to be much less common than biases.
A few sources make the suggestion that the use of -ses vs. -sses might distinguish a noun form from a verb form; e.g. this web page says "A state of matter > GASES; (verb) to poison with gas > GASSES, GASSING, GASSED" and the Grammarist page on "
Gases vs. gasses" says "In modern English, the plural of gas is usually gases, and gasses is the simple-present verb." The Google Ngram Viewer seems to provide a moderate amount of support for this distinction in that it shows a great deal of usage for gases as a noun, but no detectable usage for gases as a verb. The word gasses has a tiny but detectable amount of usage as a noun or as a verb.
If there really is a notable difference between the use of consonant doubling before -es as a noun suffix vs. as a verb suffix, the reason might be that consonant doubling is more frequent in the context of verb inflection (where there are many common examples of consonant doubling before the suffixes -ing and -ed) than in the context of noun pluralization.
add a comment |
The absence of consonant doubling in "boxes" is regular
The letter X represents two consonant sounds (in this context, /ks/) and counts as two consonants in the context of the rules for pronouncing vowel letters as "long" or "short". Double X is very uncommon and not part of the typical English spelling system (see the answers to Why do we write "fixing" instead of "fixxing"?).
You can see the regular pattern -x → -xes in many other words like foxes, mixes, hexes, taxes, sexes, fixes, flexes, sixes, fluxes.
The presence of consonant doubling in "quizzes" might be considered regular (but words spelled like "quiz" are a bit unusual)
There are not very many examples of consonant doubling before -es, for several reasons.
The usual form of this suffix is -s. The form -es only occurs regularly after sibilant sounds: /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/. (It also occurs, but never with doubling, in plural forms ending in -ves that correspond to singular forms ending in -f.)
Consonant doubling is only regular after a stressed syllable, although there are some cases in English spelling of irregular doubling after an unstressed syllable (see "Focussed" or "focused"? Rules for doubling the last consonant when adding -ed).
Many of the sibilant sounds are either rare in word-final position after stressed short vowels, or have spellings that already doubled or that are incompatible with consonant doubling.
For final /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, the "already-doubled" spellings -tch(es), -dge(s), -ss(es), -zz(es) are common. So we write witch(es), edge(s), kiss(es), mess(es), buzz(es), fuzz(es).
For final /ʃ/, the usual spelling <sh> is not doubled in any context. So we write fish(es), wish(es), ash(es), push(es), etc. When final /tʃ/ is not written double after a short vowel sound (such as attach, enrich) it is not doubled before -es either (attaches, enriches).
Words ending in /ʒ/ are extremely rare, words ending in a short stressed vowel followed by /ʒ/ are even rarer, and the most common spelling of word-final /ʒ/ is -ge, which has no corresponding doubled form. ("Corteges" may be an example of a word ending in /ɛʒɨz/).
So the issue of "to double or not to double before -es?" really only comes up with words ending in /s/ or /z/ preceded by a stressed "short vowel sound" and spelled with a single final S or a single final Z. There aren't that many words like this, so I don't know how much sense it makes to speak of a "general rule" for them.
Examples of Z being doubled before -es: quizzes, spazzes, whizzes, wizzes. But fezes and fezzes both seem to have non-negligible usage.
Examples of S being doubled before -es: buses, pluses, yeses, gases, Guses seem to be more common than busses, plusses, yesses, gasses, Gusses; but the latter forms exist. Biasses is listed in some dictionaries (e.g. AHD, Cambridge) but seems to be much less common than biases.
A few sources make the suggestion that the use of -ses vs. -sses might distinguish a noun form from a verb form; e.g. this web page says "A state of matter > GASES; (verb) to poison with gas > GASSES, GASSING, GASSED" and the Grammarist page on "
Gases vs. gasses" says "In modern English, the plural of gas is usually gases, and gasses is the simple-present verb." The Google Ngram Viewer seems to provide a moderate amount of support for this distinction in that it shows a great deal of usage for gases as a noun, but no detectable usage for gases as a verb. The word gasses has a tiny but detectable amount of usage as a noun or as a verb.
If there really is a notable difference between the use of consonant doubling before -es as a noun suffix vs. as a verb suffix, the reason might be that consonant doubling is more frequent in the context of verb inflection (where there are many common examples of consonant doubling before the suffixes -ing and -ed) than in the context of noun pluralization.
The absence of consonant doubling in "boxes" is regular
The letter X represents two consonant sounds (in this context, /ks/) and counts as two consonants in the context of the rules for pronouncing vowel letters as "long" or "short". Double X is very uncommon and not part of the typical English spelling system (see the answers to Why do we write "fixing" instead of "fixxing"?).
You can see the regular pattern -x → -xes in many other words like foxes, mixes, hexes, taxes, sexes, fixes, flexes, sixes, fluxes.
The presence of consonant doubling in "quizzes" might be considered regular (but words spelled like "quiz" are a bit unusual)
There are not very many examples of consonant doubling before -es, for several reasons.
The usual form of this suffix is -s. The form -es only occurs regularly after sibilant sounds: /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/. (It also occurs, but never with doubling, in plural forms ending in -ves that correspond to singular forms ending in -f.)
Consonant doubling is only regular after a stressed syllable, although there are some cases in English spelling of irregular doubling after an unstressed syllable (see "Focussed" or "focused"? Rules for doubling the last consonant when adding -ed).
Many of the sibilant sounds are either rare in word-final position after stressed short vowels, or have spellings that already doubled or that are incompatible with consonant doubling.
For final /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /s/, /z/, the "already-doubled" spellings -tch(es), -dge(s), -ss(es), -zz(es) are common. So we write witch(es), edge(s), kiss(es), mess(es), buzz(es), fuzz(es).
For final /ʃ/, the usual spelling <sh> is not doubled in any context. So we write fish(es), wish(es), ash(es), push(es), etc. When final /tʃ/ is not written double after a short vowel sound (such as attach, enrich) it is not doubled before -es either (attaches, enriches).
Words ending in /ʒ/ are extremely rare, words ending in a short stressed vowel followed by /ʒ/ are even rarer, and the most common spelling of word-final /ʒ/ is -ge, which has no corresponding doubled form. ("Corteges" may be an example of a word ending in /ɛʒɨz/).
So the issue of "to double or not to double before -es?" really only comes up with words ending in /s/ or /z/ preceded by a stressed "short vowel sound" and spelled with a single final S or a single final Z. There aren't that many words like this, so I don't know how much sense it makes to speak of a "general rule" for them.
Examples of Z being doubled before -es: quizzes, spazzes, whizzes, wizzes. But fezes and fezzes both seem to have non-negligible usage.
Examples of S being doubled before -es: buses, pluses, yeses, gases, Guses seem to be more common than busses, plusses, yesses, gasses, Gusses; but the latter forms exist. Biasses is listed in some dictionaries (e.g. AHD, Cambridge) but seems to be much less common than biases.
A few sources make the suggestion that the use of -ses vs. -sses might distinguish a noun form from a verb form; e.g. this web page says "A state of matter > GASES; (verb) to poison with gas > GASSES, GASSING, GASSED" and the Grammarist page on "
Gases vs. gasses" says "In modern English, the plural of gas is usually gases, and gasses is the simple-present verb." The Google Ngram Viewer seems to provide a moderate amount of support for this distinction in that it shows a great deal of usage for gases as a noun, but no detectable usage for gases as a verb. The word gasses has a tiny but detectable amount of usage as a noun or as a verb.
If there really is a notable difference between the use of consonant doubling before -es as a noun suffix vs. as a verb suffix, the reason might be that consonant doubling is more frequent in the context of verb inflection (where there are many common examples of consonant doubling before the suffixes -ing and -ed) than in the context of noun pluralization.
edited 15 mins ago
answered Oct 19 '18 at 22:51


sumelicsumelic
47.5k8113216
47.5k8113216
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67166%2fwhy-is-the-plural-of-quiz-spelled-with-double-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1I7,t55nZgRozt0l2pHZsbrMkfZx353mO7QSPIlRlUq57wPR8sIvQ1uDqdiIO 6kwB,JVsxxzU6
Busses is a valid plural of bus. Merriam-Webster, Wiktionary, The Free Dictionary.
– RegDwigнt♦
May 9 '12 at 8:23
1
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8, all of the dictionaries you have mentioned also list "buses" as a valid plural of "bus". Citing Merriam-Webster "plural bus·es also bus·ses", this makes me think that "buses" is more common.
– Larisa Lyapina
May 9 '12 at 9:24
@LarisaLyapina - Buss is an old word for "kiss"; it may be that the single-S variant gained popularity out of a desire to avoid confusion. Maybe.
– MT_Head
May 9 '12 at 9:40
2
@LarisaLyapina,MT_Head: Per this earlier question, the vehicles are normally pluralised as buses, and the electronics data/power connections as busses.
– FumbleFingers
May 9 '12 at 14:42
The more common plural form of fez is fezzes, according Merriam-Webster, although it accepts fezes as a variant.
– Sven Yargs
Oct 20 '18 at 4:13