What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm?












19















What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?










share|improve this question





























    19















    What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?










    share|improve this question



























      19












      19








      19


      6






      What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?










      share|improve this question
















      What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?







      word-choice differences synonyms nouns






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 14 '11 at 8:19









      RegDwigнt

      82.9k31281378




      82.9k31281378










      asked Apr 9 '11 at 15:58









      C. RossC. Ross

      71851227




      71851227






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          35














          Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.



          Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.



          Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 4





            +1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?

            – Alain Pannetier Φ
            Apr 9 '11 at 19:11






          • 3





            Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.

            – Mitch
            Apr 9 '11 at 20:24






          • 2





            @AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.

            – Cerberus
            Apr 13 '11 at 23:42






          • 1





            To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..

            – j-g-faustus
            Jun 6 '11 at 19:33











          • @j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591

            – Cerberus
            Jun 6 '11 at 20:05



















          7














          Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.



          A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.



          However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.



          The OED defines apocalypse as:





          1. (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.

          2. By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.

          3. Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.

          4. More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.




          As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.



          To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.






          share|improve this answer

































            2














            Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.



            World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.






            share|improve this answer































              1














              Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.



              A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.






              share|improve this answer































                0














                the disimanation of new information...A lifting of a vail. the giving of hidden manna to the over comer or God's chosen remnant good for God's people, bad for the illutionary world of man.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                  Your Answer








                  StackExchange.ready(function() {
                  var channelOptions = {
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "97"
                  };
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                  createEditor();
                  });
                  }
                  else {
                  createEditor();
                  }
                  });

                  function createEditor() {
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: false,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: null,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader: {
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  },
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  });


                  }
                  });














                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function () {
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20259%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-an-apocalypse-and-a-cataclysm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                  }
                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  5 Answers
                  5






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  5 Answers
                  5






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  35














                  Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.



                  Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.



                  Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 4





                    +1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?

                    – Alain Pannetier Φ
                    Apr 9 '11 at 19:11






                  • 3





                    Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.

                    – Mitch
                    Apr 9 '11 at 20:24






                  • 2





                    @AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.

                    – Cerberus
                    Apr 13 '11 at 23:42






                  • 1





                    To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..

                    – j-g-faustus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 19:33











                  • @j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591

                    – Cerberus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
















                  35














                  Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.



                  Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.



                  Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 4





                    +1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?

                    – Alain Pannetier Φ
                    Apr 9 '11 at 19:11






                  • 3





                    Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.

                    – Mitch
                    Apr 9 '11 at 20:24






                  • 2





                    @AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.

                    – Cerberus
                    Apr 13 '11 at 23:42






                  • 1





                    To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..

                    – j-g-faustus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 19:33











                  • @j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591

                    – Cerberus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 20:05














                  35












                  35








                  35







                  Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.



                  Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.



                  Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.



                  Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.



                  Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 12 '13 at 23:57

























                  answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:36









                  CerberusCerberus

                  54k2119206




                  54k2119206








                  • 4





                    +1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?

                    – Alain Pannetier Φ
                    Apr 9 '11 at 19:11






                  • 3





                    Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.

                    – Mitch
                    Apr 9 '11 at 20:24






                  • 2





                    @AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.

                    – Cerberus
                    Apr 13 '11 at 23:42






                  • 1





                    To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..

                    – j-g-faustus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 19:33











                  • @j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591

                    – Cerberus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 20:05














                  • 4





                    +1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?

                    – Alain Pannetier Φ
                    Apr 9 '11 at 19:11






                  • 3





                    Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.

                    – Mitch
                    Apr 9 '11 at 20:24






                  • 2





                    @AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.

                    – Cerberus
                    Apr 13 '11 at 23:42






                  • 1





                    To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..

                    – j-g-faustus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 19:33











                  • @j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591

                    – Cerberus
                    Jun 6 '11 at 20:05








                  4




                  4





                  +1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?

                  – Alain Pannetier Φ
                  Apr 9 '11 at 19:11





                  +1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?

                  – Alain Pannetier Φ
                  Apr 9 '11 at 19:11




                  3




                  3





                  Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.

                  – Mitch
                  Apr 9 '11 at 20:24





                  Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.

                  – Mitch
                  Apr 9 '11 at 20:24




                  2




                  2





                  @AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.

                  – Cerberus
                  Apr 13 '11 at 23:42





                  @AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.

                  – Cerberus
                  Apr 13 '11 at 23:42




                  1




                  1





                  To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..

                  – j-g-faustus
                  Jun 6 '11 at 19:33





                  To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..

                  – j-g-faustus
                  Jun 6 '11 at 19:33













                  @j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591

                  – Cerberus
                  Jun 6 '11 at 20:05





                  @j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591

                  – Cerberus
                  Jun 6 '11 at 20:05













                  7














                  Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.



                  A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.



                  However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.



                  The OED defines apocalypse as:





                  1. (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.

                  2. By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.

                  3. Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.

                  4. More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.




                  As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.



                  To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.






                  share|improve this answer






























                    7














                    Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.



                    A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.



                    However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.



                    The OED defines apocalypse as:





                    1. (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.

                    2. By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.

                    3. Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.

                    4. More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.




                    As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.



                    To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.






                    share|improve this answer




























                      7












                      7








                      7







                      Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.



                      A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.



                      However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.



                      The OED defines apocalypse as:





                      1. (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.

                      2. By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.

                      3. Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.

                      4. More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.




                      As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.



                      To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.






                      share|improve this answer















                      Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.



                      A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.



                      However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.



                      The OED defines apocalypse as:





                      1. (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.

                      2. By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.

                      3. Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.

                      4. More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.




                      As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.



                      To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Apr 14 '11 at 0:37









                      Uticensis

                      13.2k60129230




                      13.2k60129230










                      answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:34









                      crasiccrasic

                      600411




                      600411























                          2














                          Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.



                          World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.






                          share|improve this answer




























                            2














                            Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.



                            World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.






                            share|improve this answer


























                              2












                              2








                              2







                              Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.



                              World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.






                              share|improve this answer













                              Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.



                              World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:30









                              KarlKarl

                              5,5971931




                              5,5971931























                                  1














                                  Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.



                                  A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    1














                                    Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.



                                    A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      1












                                      1








                                      1







                                      Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.



                                      A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.



                                      A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:27









                                      mfemfe

                                      1,92089




                                      1,92089























                                          0














                                          the disimanation of new information...A lifting of a vail. the giving of hidden manna to the over comer or God's chosen remnant good for God's people, bad for the illutionary world of man.






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                                            0














                                            the disimanation of new information...A lifting of a vail. the giving of hidden manna to the over comer or God's chosen remnant good for God's people, bad for the illutionary world of man.






                                            share|improve this answer








                                            New contributor




                                            Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                              0












                                              0








                                              0







                                              the disimanation of new information...A lifting of a vail. the giving of hidden manna to the over comer or God's chosen remnant good for God's people, bad for the illutionary world of man.






                                              share|improve this answer








                                              New contributor




                                              Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                              the disimanation of new information...A lifting of a vail. the giving of hidden manna to the over comer or God's chosen remnant good for God's people, bad for the illutionary world of man.







                                              share|improve this answer








                                              New contributor




                                              Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer






                                              New contributor




                                              Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                              answered 12 mins ago









                                              StephenStephen

                                              1




                                              1




                                              New contributor




                                              Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                              New contributor





                                              Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                              Stephen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded




















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid



                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function () {
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20259%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-an-apocalypse-and-a-cataclysm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                  }
                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Усть-Каменогорск

                                                  Халкинская богословская школа

                                                  Where does the word Sparryheid come from and mean?