How can I counteract the meaning of “only” changing due to verb modifier?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?
"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.
I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."
If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."
My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?
single-word-requests meaning-in-context
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 17 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
|
show 5 more comments
How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?
"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.
I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."
If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."
My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?
single-word-requests meaning-in-context
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 17 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23
@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44
You are free to think whatever you like.
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49
And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?
– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19
@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52
|
show 5 more comments
How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?
"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.
I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."
If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."
My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?
single-word-requests meaning-in-context
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?
"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.
I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."
If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."
My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?
single-word-requests meaning-in-context
single-word-requests meaning-in-context
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16
user235979user235979
115
115
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 17 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 17 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23
@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44
You are free to think whatever you like.
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49
And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?
– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19
@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52
|
show 5 more comments
1
“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23
@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44
You are free to think whatever you like.
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49
And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?
– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19
@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52
1
1
“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23
“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23
@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44
@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44
You are free to think whatever you like.
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49
You are free to think whatever you like.
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49
And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?
– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19
And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?
– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19
@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52
@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52
|
show 5 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.
As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:
I only strive towards success.
First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.
Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.
Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):
- Only I strive towards success.
- I only strive towards success.
- I strive only towards success.
- I strive towards success only.
So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
1
This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:28
The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.
– David M W Powers
Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
add a comment |
I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of
- I only strive towards success.
- I only strive. This striving is towards success.
But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.
BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
add a comment |
"I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.
We mean
"(I only strive) (towards success)."
So it would be,
"I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415950%2fhow-can-i-counteract-the-meaning-of-only-changing-due-to-verb-modifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.
As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:
I only strive towards success.
First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.
Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.
Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):
- Only I strive towards success.
- I only strive towards success.
- I strive only towards success.
- I strive towards success only.
So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
1
This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:28
The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.
– David M W Powers
Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
add a comment |
As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.
As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:
I only strive towards success.
First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.
Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.
Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):
- Only I strive towards success.
- I only strive towards success.
- I strive only towards success.
- I strive towards success only.
So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
1
This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:28
The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.
– David M W Powers
Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
add a comment |
As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.
As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:
I only strive towards success.
First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.
Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.
Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):
- Only I strive towards success.
- I only strive towards success.
- I strive only towards success.
- I strive towards success only.
So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.
As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:
I only strive towards success.
First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.
Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.
Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):
- Only I strive towards success.
- I only strive towards success.
- I strive only towards success.
- I strive towards success only.
So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
edited Nov 21 '17 at 14:24
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39
David M W PowersDavid M W Powers
1,242812
1,242812
1
This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:28
The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.
– David M W Powers
Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
add a comment |
1
This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:28
The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.
– David M W Powers
Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
1
1
This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:28
This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:28
The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.
– David M W Powers
Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.
– David M W Powers
Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
add a comment |
I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of
- I only strive towards success.
- I only strive. This striving is towards success.
But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.
BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
add a comment |
I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of
- I only strive towards success.
- I only strive. This striving is towards success.
But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.
BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
add a comment |
I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of
- I only strive towards success.
- I only strive. This striving is towards success.
But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.
BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of
- I only strive towards success.
- I only strive. This striving is towards success.
But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.
BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50
John LawlerJohn Lawler
85.2k6118336
85.2k6118336
add a comment |
add a comment |
"I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.
We mean
"(I only strive) (towards success)."
So it would be,
"I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
add a comment |
"I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.
We mean
"(I only strive) (towards success)."
So it would be,
"I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
add a comment |
"I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.
We mean
"(I only strive) (towards success)."
So it would be,
"I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
"I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.
We mean
"(I only strive) (towards success)."
So it would be,
"I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39
KrisKris
33k641124
33k641124
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415950%2fhow-can-i-counteract-the-meaning-of-only-changing-due-to-verb-modifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23
@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44
You are free to think whatever you like.
– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49
And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?
– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19
@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."
– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52