How do I call the `function` function?












16















I am trying to call the function `function` to define a function in R code.



As we all know™️, `function`is a .Primitive that’s used internally by R to define functions when the user uses the conventional syntax, i.e.



mean1 = function (x, ...) base::mean(x, ...)


But there’s nothing preventing me from calling that primitive directly. Or so I thought. I can call other primitives directly (and even redefine them; for instance, in a moment of madness I overrode R’s builtin `for`). So this is in principle possible.



Yet I cannot get it to work for `function`. Here’s what I tried:



# Works
mean2 = as.function(c(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Works
mean3 = eval(call('function', formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Error: invalid formal argument list for "function"
mean4 = `function`(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...)))


The fact that mean3 in particular works indicates to me that mean4 should work. But it doesn’t. Why?



I checked the definition of the `function` primitive in the R source. do_function is defined in eval.c. And I see that it calls CheckFormals, which ensures that each argument is a symbol, and this fails. But why does it check this, and what does that mean?



And most importantly: Is there a way of calling the `function` primitive directly?





Just to clarify: There are trivial workarounds (this question lists two, and there’s at least a third). But I’d like to understand how this (does not) works.










share|improve this question























  • Duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/53218422/1968 (I swear I found this afterwards)

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago











  • Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/12982528/…

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @Moody's answer in the link above points out rlang::new_function, which can be called directly as a function and does essentially what function does.

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @ArtemSokolov … sure but that does exactly what my mean3 definition does. I’m well aware of workarounds, I was just curious why it doesn’t seem to work.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago













  • Sorry for misunderstanding. Please see my answer below.

    – Artem Sokolov
    4 hours ago
















16















I am trying to call the function `function` to define a function in R code.



As we all know™️, `function`is a .Primitive that’s used internally by R to define functions when the user uses the conventional syntax, i.e.



mean1 = function (x, ...) base::mean(x, ...)


But there’s nothing preventing me from calling that primitive directly. Or so I thought. I can call other primitives directly (and even redefine them; for instance, in a moment of madness I overrode R’s builtin `for`). So this is in principle possible.



Yet I cannot get it to work for `function`. Here’s what I tried:



# Works
mean2 = as.function(c(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Works
mean3 = eval(call('function', formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Error: invalid formal argument list for "function"
mean4 = `function`(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...)))


The fact that mean3 in particular works indicates to me that mean4 should work. But it doesn’t. Why?



I checked the definition of the `function` primitive in the R source. do_function is defined in eval.c. And I see that it calls CheckFormals, which ensures that each argument is a symbol, and this fails. But why does it check this, and what does that mean?



And most importantly: Is there a way of calling the `function` primitive directly?





Just to clarify: There are trivial workarounds (this question lists two, and there’s at least a third). But I’d like to understand how this (does not) works.










share|improve this question























  • Duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/53218422/1968 (I swear I found this afterwards)

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago











  • Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/12982528/…

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @Moody's answer in the link above points out rlang::new_function, which can be called directly as a function and does essentially what function does.

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @ArtemSokolov … sure but that does exactly what my mean3 definition does. I’m well aware of workarounds, I was just curious why it doesn’t seem to work.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago













  • Sorry for misunderstanding. Please see my answer below.

    – Artem Sokolov
    4 hours ago














16












16








16


5






I am trying to call the function `function` to define a function in R code.



As we all know™️, `function`is a .Primitive that’s used internally by R to define functions when the user uses the conventional syntax, i.e.



mean1 = function (x, ...) base::mean(x, ...)


But there’s nothing preventing me from calling that primitive directly. Or so I thought. I can call other primitives directly (and even redefine them; for instance, in a moment of madness I overrode R’s builtin `for`). So this is in principle possible.



Yet I cannot get it to work for `function`. Here’s what I tried:



# Works
mean2 = as.function(c(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Works
mean3 = eval(call('function', formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Error: invalid formal argument list for "function"
mean4 = `function`(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...)))


The fact that mean3 in particular works indicates to me that mean4 should work. But it doesn’t. Why?



I checked the definition of the `function` primitive in the R source. do_function is defined in eval.c. And I see that it calls CheckFormals, which ensures that each argument is a symbol, and this fails. But why does it check this, and what does that mean?



And most importantly: Is there a way of calling the `function` primitive directly?





Just to clarify: There are trivial workarounds (this question lists two, and there’s at least a third). But I’d like to understand how this (does not) works.










share|improve this question














I am trying to call the function `function` to define a function in R code.



As we all know™️, `function`is a .Primitive that’s used internally by R to define functions when the user uses the conventional syntax, i.e.



mean1 = function (x, ...) base::mean(x, ...)


But there’s nothing preventing me from calling that primitive directly. Or so I thought. I can call other primitives directly (and even redefine them; for instance, in a moment of madness I overrode R’s builtin `for`). So this is in principle possible.



Yet I cannot get it to work for `function`. Here’s what I tried:



# Works
mean2 = as.function(c(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Works
mean3 = eval(call('function', formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...))))

# Error: invalid formal argument list for "function"
mean4 = `function`(formals(mean), quote(mean(x, ...)))


The fact that mean3 in particular works indicates to me that mean4 should work. But it doesn’t. Why?



I checked the definition of the `function` primitive in the R source. do_function is defined in eval.c. And I see that it calls CheckFormals, which ensures that each argument is a symbol, and this fails. But why does it check this, and what does that mean?



And most importantly: Is there a way of calling the `function` primitive directly?





Just to clarify: There are trivial workarounds (this question lists two, and there’s at least a third). But I’d like to understand how this (does not) works.







r






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









Konrad RudolphKonrad Rudolph

397k1017861033




397k1017861033













  • Duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/53218422/1968 (I swear I found this afterwards)

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago











  • Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/12982528/…

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @Moody's answer in the link above points out rlang::new_function, which can be called directly as a function and does essentially what function does.

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @ArtemSokolov … sure but that does exactly what my mean3 definition does. I’m well aware of workarounds, I was just curious why it doesn’t seem to work.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago













  • Sorry for misunderstanding. Please see my answer below.

    – Artem Sokolov
    4 hours ago



















  • Duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/53218422/1968 (I swear I found this afterwards)

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago











  • Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/12982528/…

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @Moody's answer in the link above points out rlang::new_function, which can be called directly as a function and does essentially what function does.

    – Artem Sokolov
    8 hours ago











  • @ArtemSokolov … sure but that does exactly what my mean3 definition does. I’m well aware of workarounds, I was just curious why it doesn’t seem to work.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago













  • Sorry for misunderstanding. Please see my answer below.

    – Artem Sokolov
    4 hours ago

















Duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/53218422/1968 (I swear I found this afterwards)

– Konrad Rudolph
8 hours ago





Duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/53218422/1968 (I swear I found this afterwards)

– Konrad Rudolph
8 hours ago













Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/12982528/…

– Artem Sokolov
8 hours ago





Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/12982528/…

– Artem Sokolov
8 hours ago













@Moody's answer in the link above points out rlang::new_function, which can be called directly as a function and does essentially what function does.

– Artem Sokolov
8 hours ago





@Moody's answer in the link above points out rlang::new_function, which can be called directly as a function and does essentially what function does.

– Artem Sokolov
8 hours ago













@ArtemSokolov … sure but that does exactly what my mean3 definition does. I’m well aware of workarounds, I was just curious why it doesn’t seem to work.

– Konrad Rudolph
8 hours ago







@ArtemSokolov … sure but that does exactly what my mean3 definition does. I’m well aware of workarounds, I was just curious why it doesn’t seem to work.

– Konrad Rudolph
8 hours ago















Sorry for misunderstanding. Please see my answer below.

– Artem Sokolov
4 hours ago





Sorry for misunderstanding. Please see my answer below.

– Artem Sokolov
4 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














This is because function is a special primitive:



typeof(`function`)
#> [1] "special"


The arguments are not evaluated, so you have actually passed quote(formals(mean)) instead of the value of formals(mean). I don't think there's a way of calling function directly without evaluation tricks, except with an empty formals list which is just NULL.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    I actually tried quoting the formals (as well as using alist), yet as you noticed this also doesn’t work. typeof(`for`) is also “special”, but calling ` for ` manually works.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago








  • 1





    Yeah because for takes a symbol and two expressions, for which there is parser syntax. There is no explicit parser syntax for creating a pairlist literal, which is what function() takes.

    – lionel
    8 hours ago











  • Indeed. I just figured out that you can call it with a manually generated pairlist — but once again only indirectly because, as you said, there’s no pairlist literal syntax.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    8 hours ago





















4














For completeness’ sake, lionel’s answer hints at a way of calling `function` after all. Unfortunately it’s rather restricted, since we cannot pass any argument definition except for NULL:



mean5 = `function`(NULL, mean(x, ...))
formals(mean5) = formals(mean)


(Note the lack of quoting around the body!)



This is of course utterly unpractical (and formals<- internally calls as.function anyway.)






share|improve this answer































    1














    After digging a little bit through the source code, here are a few observations:




    1. The actual function creation is done by mkCLOSXP(). This is what gets called by function() {}, by as.function.default() and by .Primitive("function") (a.k.a. `function`)


    2. as.function.default() gets routed to do_asfunction(), which also calls CheckFormals(). However, it directly constructs these formals a few lines above that.


    3. As you pointed out, the other place where CheckFormals() gets called is inside do_function(). However, I don't think do_function() gets called by anything other than .Primitive("function"), so this is the only situation where CheckFormals() is called on the user's input.


    4. CheckFormals() does actually correctly validate a pairlist object.



    You can check the last point yourself by running parts of the CheckFormals() function using inline::cfunction



    inline::cfunction( c(x="ANY"),
    'Rprintf("is list?: %d\nTag1 OK?: %d\nTag2 OK?: %d\nTag3 NULL?: %d\n",
    isList(x), TYPEOF(TAG(x)) == SYMSXP, TYPEOF(TAG(CDR(x))) == SYMSXP,
    CDR(CDR(x)) == R_NilValue); return R_NilValue;' )( formals(mean) )

    # is list?: 1
    # Tag1 OK?: 1
    # Tag2 OK?: 1
    # Tag3 NULL?: 1


    So, somewhere between you passing formals(means) to .Primitive("function") and it getting forwarded to CheckFormals() by do_function(), the argument loses its validity. (I don't know the R source well enough to tell you how that happens.) However, since do_function() is only called by .Primitive("function"), you don't encounter this situation with any other examples.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54596743%2fhow-do-i-call-the-function-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7














      This is because function is a special primitive:



      typeof(`function`)
      #> [1] "special"


      The arguments are not evaluated, so you have actually passed quote(formals(mean)) instead of the value of formals(mean). I don't think there's a way of calling function directly without evaluation tricks, except with an empty formals list which is just NULL.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        I actually tried quoting the formals (as well as using alist), yet as you noticed this also doesn’t work. typeof(`for`) is also “special”, but calling ` for ` manually works.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago








      • 1





        Yeah because for takes a symbol and two expressions, for which there is parser syntax. There is no explicit parser syntax for creating a pairlist literal, which is what function() takes.

        – lionel
        8 hours ago











      • Indeed. I just figured out that you can call it with a manually generated pairlist — but once again only indirectly because, as you said, there’s no pairlist literal syntax.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago


















      7














      This is because function is a special primitive:



      typeof(`function`)
      #> [1] "special"


      The arguments are not evaluated, so you have actually passed quote(formals(mean)) instead of the value of formals(mean). I don't think there's a way of calling function directly without evaluation tricks, except with an empty formals list which is just NULL.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        I actually tried quoting the formals (as well as using alist), yet as you noticed this also doesn’t work. typeof(`for`) is also “special”, but calling ` for ` manually works.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago








      • 1





        Yeah because for takes a symbol and two expressions, for which there is parser syntax. There is no explicit parser syntax for creating a pairlist literal, which is what function() takes.

        – lionel
        8 hours ago











      • Indeed. I just figured out that you can call it with a manually generated pairlist — but once again only indirectly because, as you said, there’s no pairlist literal syntax.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago
















      7












      7








      7







      This is because function is a special primitive:



      typeof(`function`)
      #> [1] "special"


      The arguments are not evaluated, so you have actually passed quote(formals(mean)) instead of the value of formals(mean). I don't think there's a way of calling function directly without evaluation tricks, except with an empty formals list which is just NULL.






      share|improve this answer













      This is because function is a special primitive:



      typeof(`function`)
      #> [1] "special"


      The arguments are not evaluated, so you have actually passed quote(formals(mean)) instead of the value of formals(mean). I don't think there's a way of calling function directly without evaluation tricks, except with an empty formals list which is just NULL.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 8 hours ago









      lionellionel

      2,9321518




      2,9321518








      • 1





        I actually tried quoting the formals (as well as using alist), yet as you noticed this also doesn’t work. typeof(`for`) is also “special”, but calling ` for ` manually works.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago








      • 1





        Yeah because for takes a symbol and two expressions, for which there is parser syntax. There is no explicit parser syntax for creating a pairlist literal, which is what function() takes.

        – lionel
        8 hours ago











      • Indeed. I just figured out that you can call it with a manually generated pairlist — but once again only indirectly because, as you said, there’s no pairlist literal syntax.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago
















      • 1





        I actually tried quoting the formals (as well as using alist), yet as you noticed this also doesn’t work. typeof(`for`) is also “special”, but calling ` for ` manually works.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago








      • 1





        Yeah because for takes a symbol and two expressions, for which there is parser syntax. There is no explicit parser syntax for creating a pairlist literal, which is what function() takes.

        – lionel
        8 hours ago











      • Indeed. I just figured out that you can call it with a manually generated pairlist — but once again only indirectly because, as you said, there’s no pairlist literal syntax.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        8 hours ago










      1




      1





      I actually tried quoting the formals (as well as using alist), yet as you noticed this also doesn’t work. typeof(`for`) is also “special”, but calling ` for ` manually works.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      8 hours ago







      I actually tried quoting the formals (as well as using alist), yet as you noticed this also doesn’t work. typeof(`for`) is also “special”, but calling ` for ` manually works.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      8 hours ago






      1




      1





      Yeah because for takes a symbol and two expressions, for which there is parser syntax. There is no explicit parser syntax for creating a pairlist literal, which is what function() takes.

      – lionel
      8 hours ago





      Yeah because for takes a symbol and two expressions, for which there is parser syntax. There is no explicit parser syntax for creating a pairlist literal, which is what function() takes.

      – lionel
      8 hours ago













      Indeed. I just figured out that you can call it with a manually generated pairlist — but once again only indirectly because, as you said, there’s no pairlist literal syntax.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      8 hours ago







      Indeed. I just figured out that you can call it with a manually generated pairlist — but once again only indirectly because, as you said, there’s no pairlist literal syntax.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      8 hours ago















      4














      For completeness’ sake, lionel’s answer hints at a way of calling `function` after all. Unfortunately it’s rather restricted, since we cannot pass any argument definition except for NULL:



      mean5 = `function`(NULL, mean(x, ...))
      formals(mean5) = formals(mean)


      (Note the lack of quoting around the body!)



      This is of course utterly unpractical (and formals<- internally calls as.function anyway.)






      share|improve this answer




























        4














        For completeness’ sake, lionel’s answer hints at a way of calling `function` after all. Unfortunately it’s rather restricted, since we cannot pass any argument definition except for NULL:



        mean5 = `function`(NULL, mean(x, ...))
        formals(mean5) = formals(mean)


        (Note the lack of quoting around the body!)



        This is of course utterly unpractical (and formals<- internally calls as.function anyway.)






        share|improve this answer


























          4












          4








          4







          For completeness’ sake, lionel’s answer hints at a way of calling `function` after all. Unfortunately it’s rather restricted, since we cannot pass any argument definition except for NULL:



          mean5 = `function`(NULL, mean(x, ...))
          formals(mean5) = formals(mean)


          (Note the lack of quoting around the body!)



          This is of course utterly unpractical (and formals<- internally calls as.function anyway.)






          share|improve this answer













          For completeness’ sake, lionel’s answer hints at a way of calling `function` after all. Unfortunately it’s rather restricted, since we cannot pass any argument definition except for NULL:



          mean5 = `function`(NULL, mean(x, ...))
          formals(mean5) = formals(mean)


          (Note the lack of quoting around the body!)



          This is of course utterly unpractical (and formals<- internally calls as.function anyway.)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Konrad RudolphKonrad Rudolph

          397k1017861033




          397k1017861033























              1














              After digging a little bit through the source code, here are a few observations:




              1. The actual function creation is done by mkCLOSXP(). This is what gets called by function() {}, by as.function.default() and by .Primitive("function") (a.k.a. `function`)


              2. as.function.default() gets routed to do_asfunction(), which also calls CheckFormals(). However, it directly constructs these formals a few lines above that.


              3. As you pointed out, the other place where CheckFormals() gets called is inside do_function(). However, I don't think do_function() gets called by anything other than .Primitive("function"), so this is the only situation where CheckFormals() is called on the user's input.


              4. CheckFormals() does actually correctly validate a pairlist object.



              You can check the last point yourself by running parts of the CheckFormals() function using inline::cfunction



              inline::cfunction( c(x="ANY"),
              'Rprintf("is list?: %d\nTag1 OK?: %d\nTag2 OK?: %d\nTag3 NULL?: %d\n",
              isList(x), TYPEOF(TAG(x)) == SYMSXP, TYPEOF(TAG(CDR(x))) == SYMSXP,
              CDR(CDR(x)) == R_NilValue); return R_NilValue;' )( formals(mean) )

              # is list?: 1
              # Tag1 OK?: 1
              # Tag2 OK?: 1
              # Tag3 NULL?: 1


              So, somewhere between you passing formals(means) to .Primitive("function") and it getting forwarded to CheckFormals() by do_function(), the argument loses its validity. (I don't know the R source well enough to tell you how that happens.) However, since do_function() is only called by .Primitive("function"), you don't encounter this situation with any other examples.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                After digging a little bit through the source code, here are a few observations:




                1. The actual function creation is done by mkCLOSXP(). This is what gets called by function() {}, by as.function.default() and by .Primitive("function") (a.k.a. `function`)


                2. as.function.default() gets routed to do_asfunction(), which also calls CheckFormals(). However, it directly constructs these formals a few lines above that.


                3. As you pointed out, the other place where CheckFormals() gets called is inside do_function(). However, I don't think do_function() gets called by anything other than .Primitive("function"), so this is the only situation where CheckFormals() is called on the user's input.


                4. CheckFormals() does actually correctly validate a pairlist object.



                You can check the last point yourself by running parts of the CheckFormals() function using inline::cfunction



                inline::cfunction( c(x="ANY"),
                'Rprintf("is list?: %d\nTag1 OK?: %d\nTag2 OK?: %d\nTag3 NULL?: %d\n",
                isList(x), TYPEOF(TAG(x)) == SYMSXP, TYPEOF(TAG(CDR(x))) == SYMSXP,
                CDR(CDR(x)) == R_NilValue); return R_NilValue;' )( formals(mean) )

                # is list?: 1
                # Tag1 OK?: 1
                # Tag2 OK?: 1
                # Tag3 NULL?: 1


                So, somewhere between you passing formals(means) to .Primitive("function") and it getting forwarded to CheckFormals() by do_function(), the argument loses its validity. (I don't know the R source well enough to tell you how that happens.) However, since do_function() is only called by .Primitive("function"), you don't encounter this situation with any other examples.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  After digging a little bit through the source code, here are a few observations:




                  1. The actual function creation is done by mkCLOSXP(). This is what gets called by function() {}, by as.function.default() and by .Primitive("function") (a.k.a. `function`)


                  2. as.function.default() gets routed to do_asfunction(), which also calls CheckFormals(). However, it directly constructs these formals a few lines above that.


                  3. As you pointed out, the other place where CheckFormals() gets called is inside do_function(). However, I don't think do_function() gets called by anything other than .Primitive("function"), so this is the only situation where CheckFormals() is called on the user's input.


                  4. CheckFormals() does actually correctly validate a pairlist object.



                  You can check the last point yourself by running parts of the CheckFormals() function using inline::cfunction



                  inline::cfunction( c(x="ANY"),
                  'Rprintf("is list?: %d\nTag1 OK?: %d\nTag2 OK?: %d\nTag3 NULL?: %d\n",
                  isList(x), TYPEOF(TAG(x)) == SYMSXP, TYPEOF(TAG(CDR(x))) == SYMSXP,
                  CDR(CDR(x)) == R_NilValue); return R_NilValue;' )( formals(mean) )

                  # is list?: 1
                  # Tag1 OK?: 1
                  # Tag2 OK?: 1
                  # Tag3 NULL?: 1


                  So, somewhere between you passing formals(means) to .Primitive("function") and it getting forwarded to CheckFormals() by do_function(), the argument loses its validity. (I don't know the R source well enough to tell you how that happens.) However, since do_function() is only called by .Primitive("function"), you don't encounter this situation with any other examples.






                  share|improve this answer













                  After digging a little bit through the source code, here are a few observations:




                  1. The actual function creation is done by mkCLOSXP(). This is what gets called by function() {}, by as.function.default() and by .Primitive("function") (a.k.a. `function`)


                  2. as.function.default() gets routed to do_asfunction(), which also calls CheckFormals(). However, it directly constructs these formals a few lines above that.


                  3. As you pointed out, the other place where CheckFormals() gets called is inside do_function(). However, I don't think do_function() gets called by anything other than .Primitive("function"), so this is the only situation where CheckFormals() is called on the user's input.


                  4. CheckFormals() does actually correctly validate a pairlist object.



                  You can check the last point yourself by running parts of the CheckFormals() function using inline::cfunction



                  inline::cfunction( c(x="ANY"),
                  'Rprintf("is list?: %d\nTag1 OK?: %d\nTag2 OK?: %d\nTag3 NULL?: %d\n",
                  isList(x), TYPEOF(TAG(x)) == SYMSXP, TYPEOF(TAG(CDR(x))) == SYMSXP,
                  CDR(CDR(x)) == R_NilValue); return R_NilValue;' )( formals(mean) )

                  # is list?: 1
                  # Tag1 OK?: 1
                  # Tag2 OK?: 1
                  # Tag3 NULL?: 1


                  So, somewhere between you passing formals(means) to .Primitive("function") and it getting forwarded to CheckFormals() by do_function(), the argument loses its validity. (I don't know the R source well enough to tell you how that happens.) However, since do_function() is only called by .Primitive("function"), you don't encounter this situation with any other examples.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  Artem SokolovArtem Sokolov

                  4,86222038




                  4,86222038






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54596743%2fhow-do-i-call-the-function-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Усть-Каменогорск

                      Халкинская богословская школа

                      Высокополье (Харьковская область)